Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: Best 2.0 turbo?
Toyota Celica GT-Four (3S-GTE) 7 24.14%
Nissan Sunny GTi-R (SR20DET) 1 3.45%
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution (4G63) 12 41.38%
Subaru Impreza WRX STi (EJ20T) 9 31.03%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2004, 12:46 PM   #16
kman10587
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
kman10587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

Hehe, I wish they brought the ST205 (6th gen.) Celica GT-Four to the states. I love that design, and no one has any idea what it is
kman10587 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2004, 03:49 PM   #17
engineer
Banned
 
engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 331
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to engineer
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

yeah dont they call em celica all-trac or something in the US ?
engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2004, 10:17 PM   #18
kman10587
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
kman10587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

Yeah, I hate that name, and the ones we got are pretty slow in stock form. 3219 lbs. is just ridiculous for a sports coupe from that time period.
kman10587 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2004, 12:17 AM   #19
CrzyMR2T
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: L.A. , California
Posts: 581
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i like the gt4, but its old, slower steering, and more chance that itll have rotted parts. its old technology compared to the current evo or sti, but im sure you could add some stuff on there to make it perform just as well. i think its also on the heavy side compared to the others, i heard 3300-3400 lbs for its curb weight. it has a good engine though, it has good low to midrange punch. i heard the 3sgte could get the most power without stuff breaking out of all the 2.0 turbo engines. too bad toyota was caught cheating in wrc, and left because of too many penalties. they were doing pretty good too. i wish they kept going, i wonder how good their awd cars would be now. the last car they used for wrc was the corolla i believe.
__________________
mr2 club website m3
www.mr2oc.com
CrzyMR2T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2004, 12:41 AM   #20
kman10587
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
kman10587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

Curb weight on the 1993 Celica All-Trac Turbo is 3219 lbs. I wasn't intending for it to be compared to the current Evo and STi; I'll be more specific on years next time.
kman10587 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2004, 02:19 AM   #21
racefreak
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: saltlake city, Utah
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

i voted for the sti but that is assuming you ment best at rally the evo has the history in rally and i like them better but the car they had in the wrc sucked this year hopefully they will bounce back next year
racefreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2004, 11:26 AM   #22
kman10587
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
kman10587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

I was talking about stock street-legal versions from the early-mid 90's...I should have mentioned that at the start of the poll.
kman10587 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2004, 12:28 PM   #23
MR2Driver
AF Enthusiast
 
MR2Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 664
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2.0 Turbo AWD Battle

The GT4 woulda been a good car in the US in the mid 90's, but too much has changed
MR2Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts