Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
02-23-2002, 12:49 AM | #16 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
|
Great conversation guyz, i learned a lot, kinda. n e ways i have a simple question WHY DID YOU BUY THE WAGON??? and why did subaru make the WRX so ugly?(of course thats my opinion, but lots seem to agree with me)?? it seems like they spent all of their time on performance(which is okay) but c'mon at least make it look good so when get beat your all "that car's so f****** PHAT." instead of "ya its fast".
__________________
~**RRREEEOOORRR!!! I smell....sniff....sniff....SKANKS...why don't you girls just pack it up before I leave TREADMARKS on your faces**~ -1994 Acura Integra LS- *AEM CAI* *DC Sport Short Shifter* *Clear Bumper Lenses* * Hyper White Lights* *ITR Shift knob* |
|
02-23-2002, 01:45 AM | #17 | ||
Some Guy
|
Quote:
as for why did i buy the wagon, why would anyone buy the sedan? i mean u pay the same price but u dont get that extra little bit of car, talk about getting ripped no seriously i wanted to be different, ive always liked the looks of hatchbacks, especially wagons cuz i think they look a lot fuller than sedans. and can u say SOUND SYSTEM? a wagon is PERFECT for it! and i like my sound systems! and performance wise, after having driven both sedan and wagon, i find the wagon to be a bit faster on the road, the extra 80 lbs over the rear helping to rotate the rear end a little when the sedan just understeers. btw it seems cooler if u forget the word wagon and think of it as a lowered SUV |
||
02-23-2002, 10:29 AM | #18 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
WRX= +/-3200 lb and the ITR is about 2600-2700 The stock WRX(turbo) Makes 14.6sec bone stock in the 1/4(slow huh? for a 227hp 200+lb/ft car). Also AWD cars launches are hella slow compared to front or rear wheel drive cars. I know someone with an ITR hatch pushing 205whp and he beats the crap out of modded wrx's. He pushes a 13.4 sec on the 1/4 all motor full interior and street tires. |
||
02-23-2002, 02:40 PM | #19 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
|
Quote:
__________________
~**RRREEEOOORRR!!! I smell....sniff....sniff....SKANKS...why don't you girls just pack it up before I leave TREADMARKS on your faces**~ -1994 Acura Integra LS- *AEM CAI* *DC Sport Short Shifter* *Clear Bumper Lenses* * Hyper White Lights* *ITR Shift knob* |
||
02-23-2002, 04:08 PM | #20 | ||
Some Guy
|
Quote:
and how are awd cars slow compared to fwd? i dont see many civics or integras smoking porsche turbos, skylines, or lamborghini diablos do u? i though the fastest fwd in the world was running 8s. sorry guy but there are STREET LEGAL awds running that. oh and a new impreza only weighs 3000 lbs, at least thats what mine weighs and its a wagon, the sedan is 80 lbs lighter. |
||
02-23-2002, 04:41 PM | #21 | |||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
02-24-2002, 12:21 AM | #22 | ||
Some Guy
|
Quote:
okay if an awd and a 2wd car both have the same tires. and the 2wd car can put 100 hp to the ground from a standstill without breaking loose the tires, then the awd car can put 200hp down without breaking loose. if the 2wd can put 400hp down without breaking loose, the awd can put 800hp... with the same tires on both the awd will have double the amount of rubber putting power to the ground as a 2wd. dude just think for a moment before u post next time... |
||
02-24-2002, 01:28 PM | #23 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Ya that statement about awd launcing slow is bull. I've seen a Porsce at the strip and when it launches it actually looked like it was "Jumping" or flying off the line , no shit. It was crazy
__________________
Quote:
|
||
02-24-2002, 10:07 PM | #24 | ||
Some Guy
|
Quote:
|
||
02-25-2002, 01:12 PM | #25 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Quote:
|
||
02-25-2002, 05:42 PM | #26 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
lowered SUV? SUVs are the scum of the earth.
id rather have a wagon |
|
02-25-2002, 09:19 PM | #27 | |||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
C&D got 5.4 out of the WRX, nearly a second quicker, while mustering 6.6 in the itr, .5 slower. hum I guess it really does depend on the driver, especially in the WRX
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
02-25-2002, 10:20 PM | #28 | ||
Some Guy
|
Quote:
|
||
02-28-2002, 12:14 PM | #29 | ||
DeLorean Guy
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hazard, Kentucky
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
?
Quote:
__________________
SOLID! crew (circa 2002). DeLorean moderator. |
||
02-28-2002, 12:39 PM | #30 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: playa mexico
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Integra Type R, anyways, why do people think that the way to launch is rev to redline and drop the clutch? I thouight the idea was to NOT spin the tires.
Id rather have my tires pulling me forward than spinning and making smokie, especially on a RWD and FWD cars, but since imprezas are AWD, they might not spin as easy, but then there is the problem that guy says about bogging the egine, lets se, if the tires arenyt spinning but the clutch is out and the car isnt moving, the engine will be slowed down alot, whivch makes a difference, but I just dont think that is how the guys at the magazines drive, Id fire em if that is how they drove the cars and got the numbers for me to publish |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|