Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Mitsubishi > 3000GT/Stealth
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2004, 01:19 PM   #1
VR4Me
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Valatie, New York
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
18" Wheels vs 17"

Ok, I am going to replace the stock 18" wheels on my VR-4 with 17" 245-45-17 tires/wheels. I am told this will make the car handle better and get a softer ride. I hear the 18" wheels are only for a larger, bigger fit. Any comments on my doing this? Thanks!
VR4Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2004, 06:09 PM   #2
HKmitsubishiman
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to HKmitsubishiman Send a message via AIM to HKmitsubishiman
Re: 18" Wheels vs 17"

Well, if I were you, I would go for another set of 18s. Because I think if you want to get new rims, it's the best to get the rims that are 1 more inch than the stock rims size. So if it's your case, it will be 19, but I think 19s are too big for 3000gt. So I think it's better to keep the size as 18". But that's just what I think. And yes, I do think that the 17s do give you a softer ride, but not sure about handling better. Everybody increase the rims sizes when they get new rims, but I've never seen anyone decrease the size. But this is just my opinion. What do you guys think?
HKmitsubishiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2004, 10:15 PM   #3
talskinyguy
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,955
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to talskinyguy
18's handle better than 17's because sidewall is smaller, so it cant flex as much in turns, however the difference is negligable. The 17's will make your car faster, less rotational mass. I cut around 6 lbs per wheel going with 17's vs 18's.
talskinyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2004, 06:19 PM   #4
Igovert500
blue + red light magnet
 
Igovert500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 18" Wheels vs 17"

I'd go with 5Zigen 18" rims, they are 17lbs, vs the stock 35ish lbs chrome 18s. Your handling will be good, you'll free up some more hp with the weight savings on rotational mass, and you wont add more to the huge wheel gap you already have.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4
-K&N FIPK
-Proboost mbc
-Cusco front + rear strut bars
-Greddy type-s
-ATR downpipe
-no cats
-15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly.

Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical.
Igovert500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2004, 09:28 PM   #5
talskinyguy
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,955
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to talskinyguy
The stock wheels are at most 20lbs for the 17's and 25 for the 18's. But there is no way they are any more than that. And the 17's wont add to the wheel gap, because the tires will have a bigger sidewall. So the overall size is the same.

IMO 18's look better, but 17's were more practical for me
18x8.5 or 9.5 5zigen fno1rc wheels = $900 for a set @ 19lbs each
17x9 5zigen fno1rc wheels = $650 for a set @ 16lbs each
Tires for the 18's = $900 @ 32lbs each (lightest tires i could find)
Tires for the 17's = $600 @ 25lbs each (ditto)

Also keep in mind that the 18's rotational mass is farther from the center than the 17's. And as an added bonus I can abuse the tires a little more without worrying about the wheels as much(i.e. pot holes)
talskinyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2004, 09:31 PM   #6
YogsVR4
Funding the welfare state
 
YogsVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Petoskey, Michigan
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
I know the five spoke chrome rims from my 95 weigh 23.5 pounds - I sold a couple and thats what they weighed for shipping (I'm sure the box was a half pound of it). I don't know how much more the six spokers weighed, but 18s do look better on our cars.













Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
YogsVR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2004, 11:12 PM   #7
azn3000GTRacer
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Iowa
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 18" Wheels vs 17"

what web site can i got to to look at rims
__________________
azn3000GTRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 12:18 AM   #8
GrungeAholicVR4
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 18

Im about to make a rim change myself this week, Im going to 17" by 8" diameter, They are hella lightwieght and plus, #1 less rotational mass than my 18" chrome heavy fucks, and #2 smaller diameter means faster rotations and quicker acceleration, its basically like doing a mild gearing increase for larger gears, it makes your car faster 1/4 mile times, but your top end will suffer slightly, not bad at all with the 18 to 17 switch like im doing, if you were going to 16's....top end would suck.
GrungeAholicVR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 10:45 AM   #9
Yaggus
AF Enthusiast
 
Yaggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 728
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Yaggus Send a message via MSN to Yaggus
im sorry, but i dont get how having smaller rims makes you accelerate faster. for example if you have 17" rims and 5" think tyres then the total diameter is 22". if you have 18" rims and 4" thick tyres then your total diameter is still 22". i thought you had to keep te same overall diameter the same otherwise your speedo and odo would be thrown out.

that may be a noob question but i really dont get it.
__________________
Previously... --------| Now....
St185 GT4 Celica ---| SW20 MR2 Turbo Hardtop
TT Z32 300zx ------| Rebuilt engine with race head
TT Mitsu GTO ------| Apexi AVCR, Dual 2 1/2" Exhaust, T3/T4 turbo, BOV
--------------------| Lowered King springs, Bilstein Struts & Shocks, Whiteline swaybars, Cusco Strutbraces
--------------------| 17" Advanti Rims, Kenwood Stereo, 94+ Tailights

K3:i have had this itch... the itch to bang a somewhat chunky girl... like i want it to jiggle a little
Yaggus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 11:17 AM   #10
YogsVR4
Funding the welfare state
 
YogsVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Petoskey, Michigan
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
There a few reasons why it'll help the car go faster. The rubber in that is taking up the space the rim used to be in (that 1" of diameter) will weigh a few pounds less. Not only is the weight decreaed but you also reduce the rotational mass (unsprung force) that the engine needs to get spinning. Larger rims have more inertia because the rotating mass is further from the center of the tire. More hp is wasted just to overcome the tires increased inertia.













Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
YogsVR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 12:04 PM   #11
GrungeAholicVR4
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up Re: 18

Quote:
Originally Posted by YogsVR4
There a few reasons why it'll help the car go faster. The rubber in that is taking up the space the rim used to be in (that 1" of diameter) will weigh a few pounds less. Not only is the weight decreaed but you also reduce the rotational mass (unsprung force) that the engine needs to get spinning. Larger rims have more inertia because the rotating mass is further from the center of the tire. More hp is wasted just to overcome the tires increased inertia.
WERD ( . )( . )
GrungeAholicVR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 12:04 PM   #12
HKmitsubishiman
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to HKmitsubishiman Send a message via AIM to HKmitsubishiman

Wow
HKmitsubishiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 11:44 PM   #13
azn3000GTRacer
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Iowa
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 18" Wheels vs 17"

You know talking about less rotaional mass from a 17" from a 18" yes proably make your car quicker but you wont even noticed, It would make your car faster maybe by 1000th of a second. Only way your gonna see a huge diffrence is from the weight not from the size. You can stick 13inch rims on a VR4 and compare it to the 18's And you have the same person driving it in a 1/4 mile you might just might see a 100th of a second faster.....So dont think ur gonna get a huge perforamnce boost by going smaller rims. PLUS 18 looks so much better hell 20 inch on a VR4 would look pimp.
__________________
azn3000GTRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2004, 11:45 PM   #14
azn3000GTRacer
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mt.Pleasant, Iowa
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 18" Wheels vs 17"

oh yea that's why they invented low profiles so you can get bigger rims with the same rotational mass
__________________
azn3000GTRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2004, 02:48 AM   #15
Yaggus
AF Enthusiast
 
Yaggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 728
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Yaggus Send a message via MSN to Yaggus
Re: Re: 18

Quote:
Originally Posted by azn3000GTRacer
oh yea that's why they invented low profiles so you can get bigger rims with the same rotational mass
yeah thats what i was thinking. if you use low profile tyres then you would have the same rotational mass then would nt you?

yogs, you said:

"Not only is the weight decreaed but you also reduce the rotational mass (unsprung force) that the engine needs to get spinning. Larger rims have more inertia because the rotating mass is further from the center of the tire. More hp is wasted just to overcome the tires increased inertia"

i get the whole less weight part. that makes sense. but, when you are saying that the smaller rims have les rotational mass. i dont get that still. if the total diameter of the tyres is the same size on both the 17"s and the 18"s then wouldnt the rotational mass be the same? like what anz3000GTRacer said.

thanks for the explanation so far tho
__________________
Previously... --------| Now....
St185 GT4 Celica ---| SW20 MR2 Turbo Hardtop
TT Z32 300zx ------| Rebuilt engine with race head
TT Mitsu GTO ------| Apexi AVCR, Dual 2 1/2" Exhaust, T3/T4 turbo, BOV
--------------------| Lowered King springs, Bilstein Struts & Shocks, Whiteline swaybars, Cusco Strutbraces
--------------------| 17" Advanti Rims, Kenwood Stereo, 94+ Tailights

K3:i have had this itch... the itch to bang a somewhat chunky girl... like i want it to jiggle a little
Yaggus is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Mitsubishi > 3000GT/Stealth


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts