Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2002, 05:31 PM   #1
454Casull
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
O2 vs N2O

Instead of nitrous, what about oxygen?

Per weight, it carries more oxygen (obviously) and the cooling effect can also be realized, under the same pressure.
__________________
Some things are impossible, people say. Yet after these things happen, the very same people say that it was inevitable.
454Casull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2002, 06:33 PM   #2
ivymike1031
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ivymike1031 Send a message via Yahoo to ivymike1031
It's also one of the more dangerous things that you could conceivably carry around with you - even metals (like Al) will burn in a pure O2 environment.
__________________
Come on fhqwhgads. I see you jockin' me. Tryin' to play like... you know me...
ivymike1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2002, 07:21 PM   #3
454Casull
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The intake charge wouldn't be pure O2, there's atmospheric mix too (70% N2, 25% O2, etc.), but you probably already knew that.

So what about a mix of N2O and O2?
__________________
Some things are impossible, people say. Yet after these things happen, the very same people say that it was inevitable.
454Casull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2002, 07:31 PM   #4
Whitebread
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: dsfasdfs
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A mixture of N2O and O2 is what you get with a NOS system and an atmospheric air charge. Mixing N2O and O2 together isn't worth it, that's just more damage to your engine plus the mixture is more unstable than just N20.
Whitebread is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2002, 09:03 PM   #5
ivymike1031
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ivymike1031 Send a message via Yahoo to ivymike1031
If you want to get around the limits on O2% in atmospheric air, how about switching to a fuel with a lower (than 14.96) stoichiometric AF ratio? That way you'll require less air to burn the charge - the tradeoff would be in the LHV for the fuel (often a lower stoich AF means less bang per molecule). Perhaps you'd want to try a mixture of Methanol and Nitromethane? I think you'd find that to be quite sufficient for getting your kicks. :frog:
__________________
Come on fhqwhgads. I see you jockin' me. Tryin' to play like... you know me...
ivymike1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2002, 10:39 AM   #6
SaabJohan
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Borlänge
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gasoline, SAFR 14,7, energy content 40-44 MJ/kg
Methanol, SAFR 6,4, energy content around 20 MJ/kg
Nitromethane, SAFR around 1,7, energy content around 11 MJ/kg

N2O plus O2 is what hospitals use.
SaabJohan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2002, 03:00 PM   #7
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
i know i've seen a thread on this, but if you injected o2, it would basically burn your motor up, b/c of the rise in heat etc...

at least from what i remember... but it is pretty dangerous from what i remember...
flylwsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2002, 05:47 PM   #8
Steel
AF Fanatic
 
Steel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 4,027
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you really wanna see your cylinders flying up through your hood, bangbang, along with your ramrods too, then go ahead and use pure O2
__________________
Steel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2002, 07:50 AM   #9
SaabJohan
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Borlänge
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You can inject pure O2, but then the engine have to be delevoped for this, and you must store the O2 in the car and that is nothing that you want to do.
SaabJohan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2002, 03:32 AM   #10
Holyterror
AF Enthusiast
 
Holyterror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You hit the nail on the head. It's a weird feeling to fly a small plane and suddenly remember that there's a giant fuel tank between your legs. I don't want pure oxygen in the back seat.

When dealing with pure O2, you have to consider where it's stored and where it's going. Basically, until it bonds with a hydrocarbon and is flushed out the exhaust, the oxygen is going to be pressurized for the entire time. A pressurized oxygen environment is an open invitation for just about anything to blow up. Remember the Apollo 204 fire (yeah, before my time too, but maybe you've read about it)? Nobody is sure what actually started the fire, because there were so many things that could have exploded. Thanks to the pressurized oxygen in the cabin, spontaneous combustion was quite possible. Velcro, for example, was found to catch fire instantaneously. Strange but true. You could end up with burning metal, and that's a really bad thing. Who knows. Since O2 injection is not the most common thing in racing, I doubt many people know just what could happen. Maybe your aluminum heads would catch fire and start a ferro-aluminum thermite reaction with the rusting iron block. Okay, my imagination is running wild, but you get the point.

It's very risky and unlikely that your engine (or you) would survive for long, but yeah, it's an interesting concept. So give grandma back her respirator; she'll get more use out of it than you will.
__________________
"There are no substitutions for revolutions."

Member of AF's Slide Squad (Member #05)
Holyterror is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calling All N2O GODS Azzkikr '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV 2 08-30-2004 01:27 AM
N2O on stock d16 white97ex Forced Induction 2 03-04-2002 12:55 AM
are N2O jets bigger on bigger motors? VTECseoul Forced Induction 4 02-07-2002 09:27 PM
Precision on N2O beastfromeast Forced Induction 5 02-07-2002 09:03 PM
safe n2o b16b bomber Forced Induction 10 12-16-2001 11:40 AM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts