Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-09-2004, 10:20 PM | #61 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
I just want some companies to make some simple looking cars... all the new cars are all hightech bubble looking and gay, they kinda have the curves of a porche but they are like double the size and ugly... oh well, old rich people will buy plenty of them I guess
the way I see it is this, America will never see a car that looks like the old muscle cars that domestic tuners love and Japan will never see a car that is so suttle in looks as the great cars of the 80's and 90's... car companies are always trying to find the new trend, but really they just destroy the great cars they started with... I think every car should be based of an earlier version with maybe one new car every 8-10years, but I also don't own any car companies lol
__________________
1989 RX-7 TII --- Just got rebuilt and street ported RB 3" dual exhaust, BNR stage 1 modified factory turbo, FCD, S-AFC II, 720cc secondaries, Aftermarket Turbo inlet duct w/K&N, Hawk HP+ pads HKS Blow-Off Valve, Stainless brake and clutch lines |
|
01-09-2004, 11:55 PM | #62 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
^^Ah, you ARE aware that the only V6 among the cars you mentioned was the Z? The S2000 and Impreza are both 4cylinder powered.
And currently nissan has the SE-R spec V to compete in the low-end market.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com '92 S13 coupe KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe Cone Filter Next up: LSD RIP #05 |
|
01-10-2004, 08:33 AM | #63 | |||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
There was no GT-R in the beginning. In the beginning, there was no Nissan Skyline. It was built by a company known as Prince, who was later bought out by Nissan.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
01-10-2004, 11:03 AM | #64 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wake Forest, North Carolina
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
and yes, with the Z only pushing 287, a 215hp "sx" would be too close of a competitor to the Z, i think that nissan simply chose the glory of the Z to move on, and i think they did a good job, just no luck for us SXers, maybe theyll make a turbo'ed 350 in a year or two, the only problem is 300 seems to be the high end of the 20-40k budget in america, if you look at all those cars listed above, most (if not all...dont feel like checking the stats) have a higher end or stock package that gives the driver between 200-300 hp, alot of those cars are 4cyl, why, because they are better on gas, lighter, easier to make, and easier to fix (at least from what ive heard) so why not focus on making 4cyl some where in the mid 200s. the 350z make 287 hp, the sti is putting out 300, could you turbo the Z, yes, but for the average consumer, it seems alot nicer when u buy a car that is all assembled the way u want when u buy it....not to say many of us dont like working on our cars....but the general population again...just my opinion (thanks for the correction Fliquer) |
||
01-10-2004, 01:54 PM | #65 | |
AF Fanatic
|
3.5 litre V6 S15 sounds like an utter absolute tranvesty
and a 350SX sounds like a pointless idea. Why bother? There's already the 350Z and the new skyline. It would be pointless for nissan to have three cars with the same engine.
__________________
Qualified Automotive Engineer |
|
01-10-2004, 06:08 PM | #66 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
nissan is an idiot, they are next to mitsubishi and mazda in reliability....
im trying to slel my piece of shit and the front seal is leaking i jus found out today..... and i thoguth it was the thermo sensor..... im thinking of selling all my cars to get like a year 2000 accord or something..... something that i wont have to fix everyday.... NOT!
__________________
BANNED |
|
01-11-2004, 12:20 AM | #67 | |
AF Fanatic
|
I say they make a 2.6(do they have those?) or some type of large 4cyl non-turbo(not the KA though) not that I don't like the KA but we need something new... like a TR26DE, thats a cool sounding one haha but they should make it have like 180hp and 180lbs torque(give or take 10hp or lbs) and should stress getting the car to be under 2700lbs. make it about the same size as a 240/silvia/rx7(FC)/S2000 but focus on suspension big time, I would say base suspension off of the rx7 just because it is amazing at highspeeds and has the best lateral acceleration, it would be the best new drift/auto x car on the market. make it stock with 16x7 wheels and like 225/45H16 tires(or something close)
make it available in coupe or hatchback like the 240 but only a 2 seater with cargo boxes in the back like FC the rx7. looks should be based off of the front of a 3000gt(because it has an agressive look stock) or an FD3S rx-7, and yes it should have flip up head lights. then the back of an S2000 on the coupe and the back of either a supra or viper on the hatch.. I'm not saying look exactly like them but just kinda take ideas from them for the design. I don't know, just a thought. basically give it a natural sport look with nice curves without going crazy and making it look bubbly, give it great suspension, fairly decent power, comfortable ride with comfy bucket seats, do a lot of engine testing to make sure its as reliable as possible, and mass produce the 5spds and keep production of auto low. standard: CD player, tilt wheel, cruise, power locks and windows, 16x7 wheels, small rear wing(like FC RX7), whatever else comes standard on most sports cars now days lol optional: sliding moonroof or sunroof(whatever the difference is), leather interior, auto adjust suspension, 17x7.5 wheels, larger rear wing(like turbo supras), tinted windows, and some other stuff maybe, I don't know what all options cars come with haha and ofcourse it must be front engine/rear wheel
__________________
1989 RX-7 TII --- Just got rebuilt and street ported RB 3" dual exhaust, BNR stage 1 modified factory turbo, FCD, S-AFC II, 720cc secondaries, Aftermarket Turbo inlet duct w/K&N, Hawk HP+ pads HKS Blow-Off Valve, Stainless brake and clutch lines |
|
01-11-2004, 08:40 PM | #68 | |||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
The 350Z weighs somewhere around 3188lbs, and produces 287hp. That makes for a power to weight ratio of 180hp/ton. The G35 Coupe weighs 3435lbs, and has 280hp. The power to weight for it is around 163hp/ton. The S16 would probably weigh somewhere between the G35 Coupe and the Z. Let's be optimistic, and say it's 3200lbs. I personally wouldn't be surprised if it were more, especially if Nissan used the G35 Coupe's wide track variant of the platform. The G35 sedan's version would save some weight, and the narrower body would further differentiate the Silvia from the Z, G35 Coupe, and GT-R. The maximum production output for a VQ25DE is 215hp so far. That gives my proposed Silvia a power to weight ratio of 134hp/ton. With the 240hp VQ25DET I suggested, the ratio improves to 150/ton. Only with the full tune 276hp VQ25DET do you get very close to the Z, with 172hp/ton. Even if the Silvia is cheaper, it won't steal sales from the Z, because it simply won't be fast enough. This will be a great entry-level car for folks just getting into the world of Nissan sports cars. 1. SE-R: A good four door sport compact. 2. Silvia: Entry-level enthusiast. 3. 350Z: Mid-level, "macho" car. 4. G35 Coupe: Luxury sports car. 5. GT-R: The ultimate sports car.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
01-11-2004, 09:46 PM | #69 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Oh, I just though I'd mention one other option.
Renault has a new 2L turbo 4 banger that makes 230hp. If you want a turbo 4 in the S16 anytime soon, that might be your best and cheapest option. Sure Nissan can do some R&D and boost the QR, but that will take more time and money. Feel like waiting longer and paying more money?
__________________
Quote:
|
||
01-11-2004, 11:52 PM | #70 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
lets say they did make an s16..... and it did weigh 3200 lbs...... im shoot myself in the mouth. the lightest supra is 3498 lbs.SUPRA. SUPRA= the moby dick of japanese sports cars. its heavy garbage. the silvia is known for its light-weight-ness (if thats even a word) thats all i hafta say about that
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l 5-speed quattro 1994 lexus sc300 (dead) tein cs kenwood flip out 7'' screen 1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead) GP Sports Spec-D exhaust Custom Carbon Fiber Intake 17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha |
||
01-12-2004, 12:05 AM | #71 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
yea my idea is definately the best...
__________________
1989 RX-7 TII --- Just got rebuilt and street ported RB 3" dual exhaust, BNR stage 1 modified factory turbo, FCD, S-AFC II, 720cc secondaries, Aftermarket Turbo inlet duct w/K&N, Hawk HP+ pads HKS Blow-Off Valve, Stainless brake and clutch lines |
|
01-12-2004, 08:18 AM | #72 | |||||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
Quote:
Compare that to this: Quote:
You're hardly living up to your SN on that one. You can't have everything in this world. Do you want to try waiting for Nissan to make a lightweight rwd platform for the Silvia? If so, be my guest. Just don't go holding your breath. If you want a Silvia that is actually viable for production now, affordable, has the potential for sales in the US, and still quite capable, then something along the lines of my idea is our chance.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||
01-12-2004, 09:29 AM | #73 | ||||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
it seems to me that your listing down a bunch of totaly general things and putting a price tag on it. i can do that too. i want a rwd, with cd, p/w, p/w, moonroof, turbo, stock fang kit, 18 inch alloys, and i want it for 5 grand, but thats not happenin soyo listed very practical standard equipment. i havent ridden in any modern car with out that equipment standard. then you use words like "sporty" and "the ultimate" but you dont even describe what thats supossed to mean. comfortable like the new civic? ultimate like the enzo ferrari? are you like 13? 14 or something? and rays wheels? hahaha thats such a joke man. even the evolution ($30+k) cant afford rays. brembos? dude, youre off your rocker. the things you say just make me wanna mash my mushu. everything soyo said is so much more imaginable/practical/realistic then yours
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l 5-speed quattro 1994 lexus sc300 (dead) tein cs kenwood flip out 7'' screen 1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead) GP Sports Spec-D exhaust Custom Carbon Fiber Intake 17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha |
||||
01-12-2004, 10:23 AM | #74 | ||
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AppleValley, California
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
No-no-no-no-no-no-no! My friend! The first car WAS a GTR... not a SKYLINE-! ---1viadrft |
||
01-12-2004, 11:11 AM | #75 | ||||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 1,405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nissan 350SX.......what????
Quote:
Quote:
How on earth do you expect a modern Silvia to weigh 2700lbs?? The 240SX hasn't been that light in nearly 10 years. It's a fact of life. Cars get more modern, the gov't requires more safety equipment, and cars get heavier. Now, one of the only ways to keep cars light is to use special construction methods, and that costs extra money. Even then, it has it's limits. For example, the new Invicta S1 produced in the UK uses a body made entirely from carbon fiber that weighs only 44lbs...and it still weighs over 3000lbs. Nissan did what they could with the Z to keep it light. Remember the carbon fiber driveshaft?
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|