Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-23-2002, 06:05 AM | #1 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Acclereation...!!!!
Is it normal that stock VTEC Ludes (5th gen) feel kind of slow in the lower rpm while acceleration? When VTEC is kicking in everything is fine but I thought it would be more powerful in the lower rpm, too. Is it possible that itīs because the engine has just run about 880 miles yet? Or did I "drove it in" (dunno the correct word for it) wrong? My Honda brochure said that I shouldnīt accelerate fast in the first 600 miles so I shifted at about 3.500rpm during that time. Now Iīm kicking it more but I havenīt kicked it to the maximum yet. Any suggestions about that? Thanx in advance!!
|
|
01-23-2002, 07:00 AM | #2 | |
AF Fanatic
|
off the line, my Prelude isnt exactly stellar, either... but hammering the throttle once the motor is properly broken in is much more exhilerating.
just wait til the break in period is complete |
|
01-23-2002, 07:11 AM | #3 | ||
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
|
Quote:
|
||
01-23-2002, 07:47 AM | #4 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hickory, North Carolina
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Stock 5th G's can feel a bit sluggish off the line but not that bad. If I really get on it off the line I can get the wheels to chirp and my Prelude is an automatic with the sport shift transmission.
__________________
|
|
01-23-2002, 01:47 PM | #5 | |
AF Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This is the torque plot (at the wheels) of a mostly stock 5g prelude.
It should be fairly obvious why you really don't get going until VTEC kicks in. (It is a four cylinder engine after all...) |
|
01-23-2002, 02:24 PM | #6 | ||
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
|
Quote:
(It is a four cylinder engine after all...) [/quote] My old 4th gen Lude with a 2.0i SOHC non-VTEC engine with 133hp (plus intake, chip and exhaust) felt stronger at the low end! Or I just got that feeling because it was hella loud! |
||
01-23-2002, 02:42 PM | #7 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hickory, North Carolina
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think that my header made the most difference in my low end power but I already had my intake and exhaust when I got my header. If you get a header without having an intake or exhaust then you may not notice that much of a difference because your airflow is still somewhat restricted. If you do decide to put a header on then go for the 4-2-1 design because the 4-1 will sacrifice your low end power for high end power.
__________________
|
|
01-23-2002, 02:59 PM | #8 | |
AF Regular
|
Headers actually hurt bottom end... not much, but just a little. they mainly help your top, a little on mid, and hurt low. Higher flow only helps when there is air to push, and at lower ranges, theres not alot to push. theres really nothing that I have ever heard of to help lower end without really hurting mid and top.
Just my 2
__________________
98 Dodge Ram Southern Edition (BlueBull) Dual Ram Air Hood Gutted Catilytic Converter (damn O2 sensors) Flowmaster Single-in-Dual-out Exhaust MANUAL TRANNY (currently BLOWN UP, along with the clutch pressure plate, and throwout bearing) as LOW as possible without a C-notch 98 Dodge Ram Sport 16.41@81.9 in the quarter (Bone stock) now with no Cat. (I HATE those O2 sensors) |
|
01-23-2002, 03:14 PM | #9 | ||
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
|
Quote:
|
||
01-23-2002, 03:15 PM | #10 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hickory, North Carolina
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
4-1 headers will hurt bottom end but 4-2-1 headers will not. Well actually 4-2-1 headers could hurt bottom end, but a good header won't, like DC Sports for example.
__________________
|
|
01-23-2002, 03:19 PM | #11 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hickory, North Carolina
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This dyno chart is for a Civic SI with DC Sports 4-2-1 headers, the power gains for the Prelude wouldn't be too much different. Notice that there is at no time a loss of power.
__________________
|
|
01-23-2002, 06:56 PM | #12 | |||
AF Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Best thing you can probably do is get a decent VTEC controller. If you jump to the big lobes earlier, you get a nice smooth transition and the power climbs steadily rather than jumping up suddenly. A mild cat-back probably won't hurt (although it may not help much either). If you want a lot more power down low, look for a JRSC or N2O. Quote:
|
|||
01-23-2002, 07:36 PM | #13 | ||
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
|
Quote:
|
||
01-23-2002, 07:47 PM | #14 | ||
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
|
Quote:
A VTEC-controller...? But my engine is bone stock (going to buy a K&N drop-in maybe)! How big will be the gain? Does anybody know this JR VAPC (or anything like that)? Is it any good? I was also thinking about the JR sc. But Iīll need at least a year to get the money together and mileage becomes worse, too! And gas is really expensive over here. NOS is totally illegal!!! But I donīt trust in it anyways. |
||
01-23-2002, 09:32 PM | #15 | |
AF Regular
|
The Jr. VPAC (by Jackson Racing) can be used on n/a cars if you leave the boost timing controller wires unused. Theoretically, it would work similarly to APEXi's V-AFC.
However, the V-AFC has the advantage of adjusting fuel delivery. The VPAC cannot optimize the car's fuel setting...keep in mind, it has only a knob to adjust the VTEC engagement only, adjusting fuel/timing "automatically", so JR claims.
__________________
'99 Ficus Green Pearl Type SH: Mugen and other goodies...#77 STX My Prelude setup PreludeOnline.com moderator |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|