Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
View Poll Results: question below... | |||
rwd 2001 6.0 | 3 | 50.00% | |
1999 sv | 3 | 50.00% | |
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
11-16-2003, 08:58 PM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Location: something
Posts: 510
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2001 vs a 1999 sv!
what would win in a drag race if it were a rwd 2001 6.0(tooken out fwd so its lighter) or a 1999 sv?
thanks |
|
11-17-2003, 04:57 AM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,748
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
the one with the better driver?
|
|
11-17-2003, 02:05 PM | #3 | |
Banned
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: something
Posts: 510
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
you always say that...
|
|
11-17-2003, 09:12 PM | #4 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Victoria
Posts: 2,622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
Maybe `cause it's true?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------- My signature line. |
|
11-18-2003, 06:08 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: something
Posts: 510
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
damn it i didnt know...i was the one asking the question!
|
|
11-19-2003, 01:15 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,748
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
lol ok, the one that's better is the one with the awesome sound system blastin' out AC/DC's Highway to Hell.
|
|
11-21-2003, 07:43 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: something
Posts: 510
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
... ...but doesnt the 6.0 liter 550bhp (supposably take out the front wheel drive and ake a rwd) doesnt that make it any faster?
|
|
11-22-2003, 01:31 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,748
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
a suped up supra can beat a standard diablo (just). The size of the engine counts, but I don't know much so I can't answer the question..
why are you so interested in these topics, may I ask? |
|
12-20-2003, 06:00 PM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: kingston, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
stock for stock hardly exotic,regular, or s***ty cars can beat it(mostly zonda,mclaren,enzo,f50 and not much more), but who cares i would never want to sit in a shi*box like a supra with like 1 seat and 4 or 6cyl, and expect to be satisfyied...
|
|
01-09-2004, 11:59 PM | #10 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Waimanalo, Hawaii
Posts: 446
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs a 1999 sv!
Quote:
|
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|