Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: Which car is better and has more 'bang' for the buck?
Lamborghini Gallardo 5 45.45%
Ford GT 6 54.55%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2004, 05:39 PM   #31
1965PontiacGTO
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
1965PontiacGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clifton Park, New York
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Quote:
If you got ask "how much it costs" then you not going to drive away with either. Make mine a GT.
I like that, thats all I have to say.
__________________
My Garage
1. 1965 Pontiac GTO Tri-Powered 360hp 424 lbft torque
2. 1968 Pontiac GTO
3. 1969 Pontiac GTO
Looking for any Pontiac 1979 and earlier
"In order to establish a sportscar, you have to race it." -Zora Duntov
"There's no replacement for displacement"
Super Duty- Everything a Pontiac ought to be (until Ford swiped the name for it's truck line.)
1965PontiacGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2004, 07:25 PM   #32
Mr Payne
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by moslerporschefreak
the gallardo was built with such attention to detail, the GT was by comparison thrown together. Because of that and styling, I'd go with the gallardo.
"Right."
Mr Payne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2004, 10:15 PM   #33
freakonaleash1187
AF Enthusiast
 
freakonaleash1187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gardner, Kansas
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to freakonaleash1187 Send a message via MSN to freakonaleash1187
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

i also think that the gt was just thrown together. seems like typical ford imo.
__________________


ZedEx Crew Member #2
freakonaleash1187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2004, 10:35 PM   #34
Mr Payne
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Well damn, if two people think it, it must be true.
Mr Payne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 01:10 AM   #35
syr74
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

The Gallardo is like a rolling gold chain IMO. Flashy and expensive, but not particularly tasteful. In other words, it is the perfect Lambo.

Whereas the GT just says class and heritage to me, the Gallardo says "rap video". Just my two cents.

And, just a correction for freak here. The GT40MkIV, the most famous one, was designed totally in house by Ford Motor Company entirely within the United States on the explicit order of Henry Ford II. It was the most succesful GT40 design ever done, and was built to prove a point much like the new one. Not to start a flame war, just thought I'd let you know.

Ford has indeed "built their own car from the ground up before". And, they beat the world with it three years in a row..
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 03:24 AM   #36
crayzayjay
CFA
 
crayzayjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Payne
Well damn, if two people think it, it must be true.


I think people have it the wrong way around. The fact that Ford completed the GT in such a short time is a credit to them and not something to criticise
crayzayjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 10:59 AM   #37
TexasF355F1
AF Fanatic
 
TexasF355F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Huntsville/Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TexasF355F1
Re: Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74
Whereas the GT just says class and heritage to me, the Gallardo says "rap video". Just my two cents.

Ford has indeed "built their own car from the ground up before". And, they beat the world with it three years in a row..
Rappers have no understanding of Lambo's or any exotics. The heritage of Lamborghini, I feel is far more regarded than Ford.

They may have built the first GT by themselves, but not this one.
__________________
*Under Construction - New sig to debut*
TexasF355F1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 07:02 PM   #38
1965PontiacGTO
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
1965PontiacGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clifton Park, New York
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

ddd
__________________
My Garage
1. 1965 Pontiac GTO Tri-Powered 360hp 424 lbft torque
2. 1968 Pontiac GTO
3. 1969 Pontiac GTO
Looking for any Pontiac 1979 and earlier
"In order to establish a sportscar, you have to race it." -Zora Duntov
"There's no replacement for displacement"
Super Duty- Everything a Pontiac ought to be (until Ford swiped the name for it's truck line.)
1965PontiacGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 07:03 PM   #39
1965PontiacGTO
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
1965PontiacGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clifton Park, New York
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Quote:
i also think that the gt was just thrown together.
The Ford GT wasn't just thrown together.
__________________
My Garage
1. 1965 Pontiac GTO Tri-Powered 360hp 424 lbft torque
2. 1968 Pontiac GTO
3. 1969 Pontiac GTO
Looking for any Pontiac 1979 and earlier
"In order to establish a sportscar, you have to race it." -Zora Duntov
"There's no replacement for displacement"
Super Duty- Everything a Pontiac ought to be (until Ford swiped the name for it's truck line.)
1965PontiacGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 07:13 PM   #40
syr74
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Okay Texas, then who exactly did new one one because Ford is under the impression they did.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 08:09 PM   #41
1965PontiacGTO
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
1965PontiacGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clifton Park, New York
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

what are you talking about?
__________________
My Garage
1. 1965 Pontiac GTO Tri-Powered 360hp 424 lbft torque
2. 1968 Pontiac GTO
3. 1969 Pontiac GTO
Looking for any Pontiac 1979 and earlier
"In order to establish a sportscar, you have to race it." -Zora Duntov
"There's no replacement for displacement"
Super Duty- Everything a Pontiac ought to be (until Ford swiped the name for it's truck line.)
1965PontiacGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 09:09 PM   #42
syr74
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

[quote=TexasF355F1
...........They may have built the first GT by themselves, but not this one.[/QUOTE]................This comment by TexasF355F1 is what I was talking about 1965Pontiac.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 09:28 PM   #43
Kurtdg19
AF Enthusiast
 
Kurtdg19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Kurtdg19
I hope nobody is under the impression that the GT was just thrown together. It sounds very far fetched for any company to produce a 150k+ car to just weakly throw it together and hope nobody notices. Little bit screwy if you ask me.

Also as others said, the amount of time it took Ford to design the GT is nothing of a dissapointment. Do you think other companies try not to complete their cars as fast as possible? "Time is money", I think that fits in here. The longer it takes to design the car may possibly reflect the to-be cost of it. Every car company tries to be as efficient as possible. Ford just happend to produce the GT in a very astounding time, congrats to them.
Kurtdg19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 09:35 PM   #44
freakonaleash1187
AF Enthusiast
 
freakonaleash1187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gardner, Kansas
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to freakonaleash1187 Send a message via MSN to freakonaleash1187
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

imo the longer a car is in r&d, the better it will be because the longer it is in there, the more time they had to perfect it. unless the company is experts in that type of car (which i dont think ford are complete experts in fast cars), it should take a little longer.
__________________


ZedEx Crew Member #2
freakonaleash1187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 09:41 PM   #45
syr74
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT

Well, the GT would seem to defy that logic judging from what has been written about it so-far. The car seems to be very well conceived indeed.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Ford GT 1965PontiacGTO Gallardo 65 11-23-2008 03:37 PM
Nissan GT-R vs Porsche GT3 vs Porsche 997 Turbo vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs Honda NSX trev0006 Car Videos 0 01-27-2008 01:42 AM
Ferrari Enzo vs Ford GT vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs Ascari trev0006 Car Videos 0 08-15-2007 05:42 PM
Porsche GT3 vs Ferrari 360 vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs Ferrari Challenge Stradale trev0006 Car Videos 0 12-14-2006 02:38 PM
Best Motoring Porsche 997 Turbo vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs BMW M6 vs Acura Type-R trev0006 Car Videos 0 11-18-2006 05:00 AM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts