 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| 240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars) The original Z cars - ones that started it all. |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
08-27-2002, 02:26 AM
|
#31 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Middle of Nowhere
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
 Lets see, I can have a RWD convertible with no torque, and a tuned to the max 4 cylinder, or a RWD car w/T-Tops, gobs of torque, and tons of tuning possibilities... That sure is a tough call  300zx all the way I would take a 300zxTT over an NSX even, they are just that wonderful  -Grendel |
||
|
|
|
09-30-2002, 11:09 AM
|
#32 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I actually pondered the same question of 4th Gen. Prelude vs. 300ZX. I was, however, looking at the NA style. What it came down to for me was infact, more minor things like insurance cost. The result: I'm sitting in the seat of an '85 and all the happier for it! The thing about a Prelude (starting with the '92 models, I believe, but possibly dating back further) is that it falls under a sports coupe and a luxury car as far as insurance goes. It was going to be over 4 times the cost of the car I ended up with (or the '92 buick skylark I had before - yeah, I know...that's why I got rid of it!).
Anyway, I'm glad I went with a Z, and I'm fairly glad I went with an older one that's going to grant me the possibility of a good learning curve and something to look forward to in the future. I'd easily suggest the same for any teenage drivers looking for their first (or second) car. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
