 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
07-11-2003, 07:16 PM
|
#31 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i personally like the 4th gens the best. the 5th gens are 2nd in line and all the others just got worse with time. i think the boxier look of the past is awsome. everything coming out these days are just a bunch of wimpy beetle "bubble" cars.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 08:13 PM
|
#32 | |
|
AF Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Homeless, Illinois
Posts: 6,216
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
92 is great car except for the rust. Stay under 1998 & you'll be good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 11:07 PM
|
#33 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I feel the accord is a more dignified car. A class of it's own, i mean the civic is great but it's compared to dodge neons and cavaliers. Come on, the accord is the next level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 11:35 PM
|
#34 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 11:45 PM
|
#35 | |
|
AF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Homeless, Illinois
Posts: 6,216
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
rsx= 2-dr integra
tsx= 4-dr integra |
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2003, 01:31 AM
|
#36 | |
|
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: State College, Pennsylvania
Posts: 480
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
TSX = Mazda6
  Last edited by loesch8102; 07-12-2003 at 02:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2003, 01:59 AM
|
#37 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
damn, they do look the same. no wonder i never liked the mazda6
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2003, 02:08 AM
|
#38 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: State College, Pennsylvania
Posts: 480
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yeah they do. If you take a head on shot of the two, you can't tell the difference except for the emblems. I'm suprised Mazda isn't suing the hell out of Honda for that little stunt. Or the other way around, whoever was first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2003, 11:50 AM
|
#39 | |
|
AF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Homeless, Illinois
Posts: 6,216
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
The Mazda looks hell of a lot better than the TSX, in person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2003, 05:14 PM
|
#40 | ||
|
AF Regular
 Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 105
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
 |
||
|
|
|
|
07-13-2003, 12:15 AM
|
#41 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
the tsx and euro accord are susposed to have an all wheel drive option coming up. I think honda is jumping on to the sports sedan band wagon chasing mitsibishi and subaru. It's about time we see a honda rally car, i mean dodge has a rally edition neon. Honda is better than that, it's time to one up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-13-2003, 09:15 PM
|
#42 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derry, New Hampshire
Posts: 841
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
All wheel drive Accord, huh? Oh man, that would be sweet. But to REALLY compete with the other import companies for the "rally" market, a factory turbo charger might be needed... *Jeff drools at the thought of a stock turbo charged Accord* Oh man, that would be sweet. I know, I know, Honda prides themselves on their NA engine mechanics, and why not? Few engines sound better than a Honda at WOT. But I would think there would need to be a little something else assisting the engine (beyond VTEC), especially with an AWD setup.
__________________
(k) TZero publications. All rights reversed. Reprint what you like. Fnord |
|
|
|
|
|
07-13-2003, 09:22 PM
|
#43 | ||
|
AF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Homeless, Illinois
Posts: 6,216
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
 I think the opposite. |
||
|
|
|
|
07-13-2003, 11:15 PM
|
#44 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derry, New Hampshire
Posts: 841
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Really? I love the sound of my engine (hopefully not just because I happen to own a Honda- stay away evil bias!!) But then again, maybe I'm a weird guy. I also love the sound of a Wankel Rotary, but I know many people who loathe the high pitched whine. To each his own, I guess. I'm curious as to what tops your list?
__________________
(k) TZero publications. All rights reversed. Reprint what you like. Fnord |
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2003, 12:17 AM
|
#45 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hurlburt fld, Florida
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
personally.. i like the accord. theres nothing wrong with civics you just need to mod them up to get them to move.. i got an 88 accord lxi my friend got a 97 civic lx. D16 its the 1.6 single cam 8 valve (no vtec) i got the A20 simple 2.0 single cam (12 valve) hes got 106 hp i got 122. hes got about 2500 lbs to his car i got about 2650. (his car is lighter but he himself is 100 lbs heavier then me) both cars are stock. on the street he won the reaction time but i gradually got past him around 40 mph i beat him up to 70 when i let off the pedal cuz we were on a street with lots of cops speed limit at 45. then he said he blew past me cuz hes got more power.. but hes stupid he thinks his car is so fast. but ay you know what i got nothing against civics.. but everyone think they are so great when they cant beat a car 2.5 times its age. last year it was 3 times its age. civics are great like i said earlier but you need to mod them you cant stick with the stock usdm engine. oh and he thought he could beat my prelude too... HAHAHAHAHAHA..
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
