Cars I RAPED!!!

[krispycamaro]

Originally Posted by FormulaLT1

1. The Corvette & F-body have the same exact engine!. NOT TRUE

2. The Average Stock LS! run 13.2!. Not the case sorry

3. They actually put out 350 horsepower really not the case. You will find it printed no where that they put out anything within 30 horsepower of that anywhere even though I agree they are under-rated

when dynos of 01-02 models have them a 310 at the wheels you can imagine they are around 340ish

[10.5sec92AWDTALON]

Originally Posted by FormulaLT1

1. The Corvette & F-body have the same exact engine!. NOT TRUE

2. The Average Stock LS! run 13.2!. Not the case sorry

3. They actually put out 350 horsepower really not the case. You will find it printed no where that they put out anything within 30 horsepower of that anywhere even though I agree they are under-rated

umm your wrong. 2001-2002 SS/WS6 ARE FACTORY LISTED AT 325 HP, IN THE FIREHAWK 345 HP.

I did not say the average LS1 runs 13.2. But MANY Do. Explain my 13.1???? the car has only 6,000 miles on it. A filter and lid are my only mods(which the Firehawk come with) do the math. 13.1@107 with an automatic, figure out the RWH required for that.

[FormulaLT1]

Originally Posted by FBODIES>MAXIMAS

The Ls1 Can Neva Lose!!!!!!!

Dude your a ass , Shut up!
I can get you banned , So go post somewhere else!
You can't help either cause or side your on.

[Bird of Fire]

If you have us banned the average automotive IQ of this board will plummet. Seriously.

[FormulaLT1]

Originally Posted by 10.5sec92AWDTALON

umm your wrong. 2001-2002 SS/WS6 ARE FACTORY LISTED AT 325 HP, IN THE FIREHAWK 345 HP.

I did not say the average LS1 runs 13.2. But MANY Do. Explain my 13.1???? the car has only 6,000 miles on it. A filter and lid are my only mods(which the Firehawk come with) do the math. 13.1@107 with an automatic, figure out the RWH required for that.

Your number's are impressive but after talking to and seeing many LS1 run the 1/4 with my own eyes most run mid 13's. Are there factory freaks out there yes but there also plenty of your average car. and it may be possible they put 340 but then they are losing alot through the drivetrain anything over 12 percent for a manual is a disgrace

[10.5sec92AWDTALON]

Originally Posted by FormulaLT1

.

"You will find it printed no where that they put out anything within 30 horsepower of that anywhere even though I agree they are under-rated."

I've given you proof, the SS/WS6 in 2001-2002 IS factory listed at 325 HP, the SAME LS1 in the Firehawk is listed at 345 HP.

[10.5sec92AWDTALON]

the manuals are slower than the auto at the track due to being harder to launch, they usually are off by 2 tenths on the ET but show a 2 MPH higher trap speed.

[FormulaLT1]

OK then are the Corvette's under-rated?

[FormulaLT1]

Originally Posted by 10.5sec92AWDTALON

the manuals are slower than the auto at the track due to being harder to launch, they usually are off by 2 tenths on the ET but show a 2 MPH higher trap speed.

Which geared Auto?

[Bird of Fire]

Originally Posted by FormulaLT1

OK then are the Corvette's under-rated?

To a point, no not really. They dyno fairly close to the LS1 f-bodies and trap a little bit higher due to drivetrain differences, aero and traction.

Corvette is GM's baby. Even in 1979 and 1989 when Pontiac had trans-ams that were faster than it in every road test, the corvette STILL had more horsepower, yet weighed less and was slower. Hrm....wonder why?

[FBODIES>MAXIMAS]

f body---><----maxima

[10.5sec92AWDTALON]

Basically The SS/WS6 auto come with 3:23 gears stock.

The M6 manual comes with 3:42 stock.

A regular Z28/T/A usually has 2:73 gears stock for the auto.

The LS1 in the Vette/GTO was rated at 350 HP which is reasonably close.

[FBODIES>MAXIMAS]

so when someone proves you losers wrong you ban them so you can go back to you make believe world were maximas are fast and ls1's are slow and you "rape" real sports cars with you pos econo box's. remember













ls2.com own3z you all

[THT]

You guys and your mag racing times...christ. It's the power curve that matters, not peak TQ/HP. There're plenty of 4th gen Maximas running 14.7 stock and 14.1 with bolt ons and those are real world numbers proven time and time again by maxima.org members.

Any Maxima driver who claims to have beaten a LS1 would have to show me pics of a sick turbo and nitrous setup because that's what it takes to beat them in a straight line. I know of four (4) Maximas that can do the 1/4 in under 13s and they're all boosted.

Look, this thread started as shit and it still is. Let it die. Bottom line: LS1>n/a Maxima in a straight line

~THT

[FormulaLT1]

So are you saying that even though the Vette is lighter and have less drag. And a claimed more horsepower!.
Your magic Camaro is just as fast or faster than one!.
Holy sh*t your the typical LS1 owner, no wonder Mustang owner's hate you guys.
I'm done you can fight it out with the Maxima and your a little outta touch man.