Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-20-2004, 06:34 PM   #61
Auto_newb
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ....., Connecticut
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Turbo Vs. Super

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sy.Berian.Wulf
here where i live we got a goodie called a waste gate.... sure the turbo has a wastegate on it to control boost.... otherwise it would go mad... the graph is a parabola....therefore at some point it goes vertical compressing air.... the wastegate im talking about releases stored compressed air into the manifold which pushes the revs back up... go look at HKS racing and check out their products...

It's not called a wastegate, its called a "Blow off valve"...
Auto_newb is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 07:29 PM   #62
Holyterror
AF Enthusiast
 
Holyterror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Turbo Vs. Super

I think he was referring to a bypass valve. A blow-off valve vents into the atmosphere (hence the distinguishing "pfft"), whereas a bypass valve directs air through the exhaust.
__________________
"There are no substitutions for revolutions."

Member of AF's Slide Squad (Member #05)
Holyterror is offline  
Old 02-20-2004, 07:34 PM   #63
Auto_newb
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ....., Connecticut
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Turbo Vs. Super

Oh, I read somewhere that the blow off valve cut the air off to the engine when you release the throttle therefore reducing lag. Or something like that.
Auto_newb is offline  
Old 02-21-2004, 10:02 AM   #64
SaabJohan
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Borlänge
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Turbo Vs. Super

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auto_newb
Oh, I read somewhere that the blow off valve cut the air off to the engine when you release the throttle therefore reducing lag. Or something like that.
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=187376

A blow off valve of the same thing as a bypass valve except that the bypass valve recirculate the air within the system.

However, valves which cuts off the flow to the turbocompressor have also been used.
SaabJohan is offline  
Old 03-28-2004, 02:11 PM   #65
pind
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: whitehorse
Posts: 326
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Turbo Vs. Super

and for the feeling of less turbo lag. A shot of nitrous or even compressed air, ducted into the compressor wheel housing at the proper angle, and used with some common sense, spools the turbo up more quickly, allowing it to produce better flow at lower engine RPM and waking the engine up a little.
But then, I'm also a diesel freak in my profession, and spare time, these are the things we do.
pind is offline  
Old 04-21-2004, 12:44 PM   #66
xXRyCe_R0CkEtXx
AF Newbie
 
xXRyCe_R0CkEtXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 10603, California
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Turbo Vs. Super

Turbo is better...an if u wanna go ahead an complain about turbo lag....well if ur rich enuf theres always ALS....
__________________
O.o
xXRyCe_R0CkEtXx is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:38 AM   #67
JForce1
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Yorba Linda, California
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Superchargers power the most powerful and fastest drag cars on the planet...
JForce1 is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 12:16 PM   #68
beef_bourito
AF Enthusiast
 
beef_bourito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,191
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Turbo Vs. Super

that's because turbos are either restricted with weight or they are not allowed. this thread has not been posted in for over a year, don't post in really old threads. welcome to the forum though.
beef_bourito is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 01:55 PM   #69
Polygon
The Red Baron
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alpine, Utah
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polygon Send a message via Skype™ to Polygon
Re: Re: Turbo Vs. Super

Quote:
Originally Posted by beef_bourito
that's because turbos are either restricted with weight or they are not allowed. this thread has not been posted in for over a year, don't post in really old threads. welcome to the forum though.
Bingo, on both accounts.
Polygon is offline  
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbo vs. super charged rice(er) Forced Induction 9 06-15-2005 06:32 PM
Turbo vs super FireFox05 Grand Prix 11 12-07-2004 10:18 PM
turbo vs. super jsjs Camaro Discussions 10 05-28-2004 01:04 AM
Turbo Magazine vs Super Street vs Sport Compact Car Grendel COMPLETELY off-topic 1 06-24-2002 03:11 AM
turbo charger vs. super charger bluevette74 Car Comparisons 12 12-05-2001 08:52 PM

Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts