Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
11-30-2002, 10:35 AM | #1 | |
CFA
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
New> Audi TT 3.2 quattro
The Audi TT has just gained the R32 Golf's 3.2l V6 engine, which develops 250bhp. The transmission is completely new, a racing technology named DSG, which apparently combines all the benefits of a manual 6-speed box and an auto... how many times have we heard that about a semi-auto that goes on to severely disappoint?
i still have one bone to pick with TT's. theyre girls cars. ive only ever seen one driven hard, and that was yesterday, it shocked me completely... the car looked nice being caned relative to how i usually see it, i.e. cruising down the road at 20mph... even if this 250bhp version will be a genuinely good driver's car, it will be driven by the same people, i.e. women and ahem.... you know |
|
12-02-2002, 10:10 PM | #2 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I wouldn't go over to audiworld.com with talk like that. Actually I know several men that own TTs and drive the hell out em. I hope the new TT is a real drivers car, the design is wondeful and if it had performance to match it might give the boxster a run for its money.
|
|
12-03-2002, 12:55 AM | #3 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: New> Audi TT 3.2 quattro
Quote:
|
||
12-03-2002, 12:57 AM | #4 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
12-03-2002, 06:00 PM | #5 | ||
CFA
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
What i said is what i have reason to believe is the truth. Where i live, London, the majority of TT drivers are women, or Kings Road ponces. It might give a Boxster a run for its money on a straight, but when it comes to the twisties the difference is astounding. The Boxster is a perfectly balanced mid-engined, fully-fledged sports car with exceptional handling and incredible steering feedback. The TT lags significantly behind in the majority of these points and is an ideal poseur's car. Im not saying Boxster owners arent poseurs, im sure the majority is, as is the case with most sports cars, but if the owner is a fanatic, its nice to know his car can do something the TT never will. |
||
12-03-2002, 06:02 PM | #6 | ||
CFA
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Re: New> Audi TT 3.2 quattro
Quote:
|
||
12-03-2002, 06:05 PM | #7 | ||
CFA
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Dont get me wrong, i dig the styling, its just feminine, i think its hard to argue with that. The SLK also has a feminine shape and its gorgeous, so saying that is not the end of the world. And yeah, youre right the interior leaves a lot to be desired of the Porsche, but when it comes to choosing between the two i wouldnt bat an eyelid and go for the Porsche. Even the first, slightly underpowered 205bhp one. Throw in the Boxster S (pre or post revision) and its a complete no-contest. Unless you want to cruise, in which case i'd take the TT... Then again, maybe not. |
||
12-04-2002, 02:22 PM | #8 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
I guess the only factual statement being made towards the TT and feminemity are the ones issued in the Auto Polls done in England about which car makes a man sexy....and the lead car was the TT..of course, those were brititsh gals who answered and we all know how they are.. |
||
12-04-2002, 06:59 PM | #9 | ||
CFA
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
12-16-2002, 11:17 AM | #10 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well to back up Crayzayjay. I think a car is not made femine by the company but when you start to se more and more girls driving them. I was gonna get a 350Z untill I started seeing more and more girls driving it. The Z is by far not a girls car. But in my mind it is b/c of the dozen or so Z's I've seen on the road. Only 3or4 of them were drivin by men. As per performance of the TT vs Boxster I think I'd take the boxster. But I'd rather wait on the comparission till the new TT with engine upgrades is released. I honestly like the Audi right now ahead of the TT b/c of the Quatro it makes it a lil more useful for me when the weather gets nasty. plus you have a very nice looing car.
__________________
HUGS & KISSES, NAP |
|
12-16-2002, 01:03 PM | #11 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
As far as the boxter not being a true porsche, I only say that as its a statement well versed by true porsche owners. |
||
12-18-2002, 07:12 AM | #12 | |
CFA
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
OK so im not going to be able to change your mind.. but tell me why is the TT never included in tests against sports cars? and why is the Boxster pitted against cars with twice the power, such as TVR's, which let me guess you think arent true drivers' cars? Ill tell you why. Because the TT is a pretty car, but far from a drivers car. the 4wd setup leads to understeer and steering feedback is poor, and thats being kind. the boxtser on the other hand is a terrific sports car, one of the best handling and enjoyable drives of the decade.. not to call it a true porsche underlines one's ignorance. porsche makes terrific sports cars. whilst the original Boxtser (2.5) was a little lacking in power, it was certainly a great sports car. the tt is far from it; i havent seen or read anyone putting their head on the block and calling it a drivers car. you know why? cos theyd be wrong
|
|
12-18-2002, 01:03 PM | #13 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
01-13-2003, 08:25 AM | #14 | |
CFA
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
i dont know what car magazines you read pal but ive never come across a single one that rates the TT higher than a 3-series coupe, let alone a Boxster or 911. And that includes American, English and French magazines that i regularly read... the fact is it is praised for its looks and heavily criticised for the way it goes. no handling finesse, no feel, no involvement. thats not a drivers car. drive a Boxtser or 911 and you feel everything, its unreal, its not even a close comparison. carry on living in your dream world. just cos Pug 206 is a great rally car it doesnt mean the road version is any good at being a drivers car, which trust me it really isnt. you cant introduce factors like that im afraid.
oh and btw, 911 owners who dont rate the Boxster as a true porsche have their head too far up their own ass. The Boxster remains one of the best balanced cars of all time and a fantastic drive.. engine sounds great too, just like the Audi TT... no wait, the TT is mute... sorry |
|
01-13-2003, 11:09 AM | #15 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|