Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
View Poll Results: Which has the best performance? | |||
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR FQ400 | 27 | 51.92% | |
2004 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 | 20 | 38.46% | |
2000 Ford Mustang Cobra R | 5 | 9.62% | |
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-17-2005, 06:47 AM | #106 | ||
AF Regular
|
Re: Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
__________________
|
||
01-17-2005, 08:32 AM | #107 | |
Razor Sharp Twit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: london
Posts: 5,863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
i) the M3's inline six is nothing like the 330's six.
sure you can mod it but you and your aftermarket parts isn't going to turn it into the M3's six. ii) you can't just walk into any mitsubishi dealsership and buy an FQ400. iii) the SL65AMG isn't a limited production car, it's just made slowly. iv) you don't seem to know what 'in-house' means so don't talk about what you don't know. but i should say, i'm not entirely convinced that the FQ400 should be considered a modded car. i mean, it [i]is[i/] a turbo rally based car (so aren't all EVO's modded cars?). I see it as another, albeit limited, version with a very special state of tune. argue away boys..... |
|
01-17-2005, 10:30 AM | #108 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2003
Location: asdf
Posts: 872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I know there's a lot of good points out there (I've argued about this before too), but the fact is if whatever it is you're buying comes with a manufacturer's warranty and you pick it up from the dealership then it is a production car. It can very well be a customized production car, but so what? Where do you draw the line on which suppliers make up authentic dealer parts? GM uses Crane to build their performance parts roller rockers and Comp Cams for a few of their P.P. camshafts. SLP originally took Z28's and Firebird's from the factory to their own location to change them into SS & Firehawk models, then sent them to the dealers. After a few years GM/SLP produced them in house. Would a '96 SS be considered a tuner car and a '99 SS be considered production?
Here's a good example: the Corvette ZR-1. Its 32-valve LT5 V8 was designed by GM's Lotus division in Britain and built by Mercury Marine. GM's production cost on the LT5 was astronomical (due in large part because a third party was building it). Was the ZR-1 a tuner car?? Don't think so. Don't matter who built it, designed it, whatever... that car was all Vette, and a classic. |
|
01-17-2005, 01:03 PM | #109 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NEW PLYMOUTH
Posts: 1,530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
hmmmm my car's got a yamaha engine, is yamaha in hose for toyota?
better still my g/f's car has momo and recaro interior, and a kenwood cd/md all from mitsubishi, some parts are standard, some parts were options but they are all under the warrantee and available from the dealer.... if we ticked the box with different wheel style is it no longer a factory car? it's REALLY common for jap cars like these to not only have parts changed by "aftermarket" companies but to have to strip them first to do it. fact is when the car is built it is built from day 1 to have those parts fitted, it doesn't matter whether they fit in in the production line or drive it down the street to get the parts fitted, thats the production process, just cause you would produce it a different way doesn't mean its better. besides i'm willing to bet there are more cars coming of the lancer/evo factory line than there are the corvette line, and these cars go on to have all sorts of different specs, seems to me to make sense to want to get the extra special ones out of the way, that way you could take longer on them and not hold up the granny lancers behind it...
__________________
Who needs AWD? i feel inspired by the original 911 turbo, my car will have more rubber sqeezed in its ass than Annabelle Chong! and it will go down as one of the greatest rides in history! |
|
01-17-2005, 01:20 PM | #110 | |
Razor Sharp Twit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: london
Posts: 5,863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
....should also add that in the uk, with the exception of the standard uk spec evo, all of the others are FQs (280, 300, 340, 400).
|
|
01-17-2005, 10:20 PM | #111 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
all good points but it is called the MR (mitsu racing) which makes it as in-house as SVT to me IMO. just because chevy doesnt designate the department that designs and builds the Z06 with an insignia or letterhead, doesnt make it any less modded than another IMO. chevy didnt manufacture quite a few parts on the Z06 so since chevy didnt make it, its modded as well (according to some ppls posts here). btw, since when is an engine swap not modding? atleast the evo is using the same engine, the vette isnt even using the vette engine, they just dropped a completely different one in there instead. thats more of a modification than saleen does for stangs (which is a shitload). as far as modding goes, an engine swap is obviously more modding than basically just slapping on a bigger turbo. ( i know its a bit more than that but still...). im sure theres some inconsistancy in my post but im damn near sleep. now im off to bed, you can rip my post apart till i come back. HAVE AT YOU SNAKE!!
__________________
Me>>>you.....n00b |
|
01-18-2005, 04:31 AM | #112 | |||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
I hate to put a fly in you’re ointment but an engine swap involves removing an already fitted engine from a car and replacing it with something different. See below: Quote:
The Z06 is stock; end of story. The FQ400 on the other hand as I have said involves carrying out changes to a standard EVO. Changes to the engine, transmission, suspension and other major systems that alter the performance of the car. Were not talking about things like sparkplugs, light bulbs and stereos here. Here is a list of changes to the EVO that make the FQ400: Custom built Garrett GT Dual Ball bearing Turbocharger Owen Developments custom manufactured cast Stainless Steel Exhaust Manifold and Exhaust Elbow Omega Forged Pistons HKS Forged Con Rods HKS 680cc Injectors Zytec ITP116 High Pressure Fuel Pump HKS 1.6 mm Steel Head Gasket Motec M800 OEM ECU HKS Iridium Spark Plugs Jan Speed High Flow Sports Cat Alcon competition derived 240 mm high clamp mode, heavy duty clutch complete with Cera-metallic 6 paddle sprung centred drive plate HKS High Strength Head and Big End Bolts Alcon Mono6 Brake Kit incorporating Monobloc 6 pot road caliper with 343 mm curved vein Disc on a Aluminium mounting bell assembly with Ferodo DS2500 brake pads Ralliart Aero Mirrors Carbon Fibre Front Lip Spoiler Carbon Fibre "Sharks Tooth" Rear Vortex Generator PIAA High Performance Light and Wiper Upgrade Gloss Black Team Dynamics Lightweight Alloy Wheels Sounds like the mod list someone would put in their signature. Notice the large number of aftermarket names that crop up. Even the turbo is the work of Garret, custom built as it may be. I don’t expect to convince everyone with my thoughts on what is stock and what isn’t but to say that a Z06 is as "modded" as an FQ400 is absurd. The Callaway Corvettes of the late 80's are more on par with the FQ400 when it comes to this. They are made in a similar fashion with the only difference being that Callaway was not a subsidiary of GM as Ralliart is to Mitsubishi.
__________________
DOUBLE THE FIST Are you Fistworthy? "I am ispeptic, phasmatic even compuntious to cause you such perry combobulations." E. Blackadder 1827 |
|||
01-18-2005, 06:41 AM | #113 | ||
AF Regular
|
Re: Re: Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
__________________
|
||
01-18-2005, 08:42 AM | #114 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2003
Location: asdf
Posts: 872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
My Z must be a tuner because its got so much AC Delco shit in it...
lol I'm just pullin chains here |
|
01-18-2005, 10:16 AM | #115 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
i see your point guy, but i find it funny that you say an MR is modded because it uses parts that mitsu didnt make when we all know a Z06 uses parts chevy (and most others) didnt make, that logic is hypocritical so im axxing it. im getting tired of people saying "you didnt read his post..." because its obvious you didnt read mine right. im not trying to prove that a Z06 is modded more than a MR, im just saying if one is considered modded albeit more, doesnt mean the next one isnt.
the other defense i keep getting (which is quite good i might add) is that because its a different engine, and because of the hard top thing which doesnt fly with me because the frame from the Z06 is the same as the C5 in that aspect, just because they havent recently made any FRC C5s doesnt mean that frame is designated a Z06 frame, if it was then no one could have owned a vette with that frame without owning a Z06 which we know isnt true so im going to axe that logic as well. what we are left with is the engine thing which like i said is a good argument that i cant refute at this moment (or ever). *hands Vettribution87 a beer*
__________________
Me>>>you.....n00b |
|
01-18-2005, 08:08 PM | #116 | ||
AF Regular
|
Re: Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
__________________
|
||
01-19-2005, 07:15 AM | #117 | ||||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
In any case when you mention the "MR" (ie. Mitsubishi Racing) it causes me a bit of confusion as I have seen that same designation on EVO's with less then half the capability of the FQ400, and even on those cheap Mitsubishi Colts that not too long ago used to be sold over here in Australia badged as Lancers for some reason. See Pic Below: 1999 Lancer MR CEII In any case I was referring to the EVO FQ400 alone and not the "MR" or "MR" range in general. Although thinking it though I suppose you right regarding the use of 3rd party parts as it does seem (especially these days) that 3rd party parts are the norm. Even though I suspect that the FQ400 has received far more 3rd party attention then the Z06 I have to concede that technically it would be pretty hard to justify this as an argument as it would require drawing the line on what is an acceptable level of 3rd party involvement. This in turn would be open to bias and therefore become an unfair argument to use. Nevertheless I remain suspicious of wether this FQ400 can be considered stock due to the way it is made; but I suppose I will have to leave it there as trying to categorize stock and modded has proven to be a very vague and opinionated subject to deal with. Quote:
Although (as you quite rightly point out) the space frame of a C5 targa and a Z06 have many similarities, it still doesn’t escape the fact that for production purposes all 2001+ hard tops are Z06's. One of the lessons learned from the C4 Corvette was to exploit the extra stiffness and rigidity of the cars roof to decrease lateral and vertical chassis roll. Now way back in the late 70's the original plan with the C4 was to make it a hardtop in order to facilitate better handling. At the 11th hour before going to market after all the chassis engineering and testing had been done management insisted that the C4 be a targa. By cutting the roof section off it considerably reduced the stiffness of the entire car, and the only way they could get anywhere near the stiffness they had before was to further re-enforce the backbone of the chassis with an extra rail support though the middle. I can tell you from experience that driving the C4 topless makes a big difference to the chassis roll when cornering. It figures to me that when a Z06 is made its roof would be moulded out with the rest of the space frame and hence take advantage of the stiffness. This would mean that the Z06's frame would have to be made differently, and as a car's frame is primarily the gestalt structure that makes it a car then this would be the argument that would make it stock (ie: singular from the beginning). Of course this argument can go completely out the window if we go further back to when the space frames were sheets of metal. In that instance I’m screwed. *hands Master Hiko an expensive imported beer* Quote:
__________________
DOUBLE THE FIST Are you Fistworthy? "I am ispeptic, phasmatic even compuntious to cause you such perry combobulations." E. Blackadder 1827 |
||||
01-19-2005, 10:54 AM | #118 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
__________________
Me>>>you.....n00b |
||
01-19-2005, 01:02 PM | #119 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: gjlkj, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
holy f*ck nut evo all the way.... just too damn insane too pass up.
|
|
01-19-2005, 01:08 PM | #120 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: EVO MR FQ400 vs. Corvette Z06 vs. Mustang Cobra R
Quote:
|
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|