Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
View Poll Results: What do you think? | |||
They should maintain the present with flat sixes in Porsches. | 13 | 41.94% | |
V-8s are ok. That means more power. | 13 | 41.94% | |
Don't care. | 4 | 12.90% | |
What is a flat six. | 1 | 3.23% | |
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-22-2003, 04:01 PM | #31 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The 3rd link isn't really that great either. I'll try to source out that magazine.
|
|
08-06-2003, 01:57 PM | #32 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
OK, I found one of the sources that read it in:
June 2003 edition of "Oldtimer Markt" - Europes most published magazine for classic cars and motorcycles. It's on page 11, part of the article on the Porsche 917 "Der Widerspenstigen Zähmung". It roughly translates: "Even though the 180 degree cylinder angle would have one believe that the Type 912 motor is a Boxer (engine), it was in fact a flat V-engine. The difference being that a "boxer" motor has one crank pin per cylinder, which enables the cylders to "box" at one another. But like a V-motor, two cylinders shared a crank pin (in this engine.)" This text suggests that "boxer" motors are unique. It makes no mention of "flat" engines, as some of the links I posted earlier do. I'll post more as I find it... |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|