http://forum.planetisuzoo.com/viewtopic.php?t=9398

http://www.supermarineaircraft.com/Images/P1000071.JPG

I've seen a Spitfire experimental kit plane at an airshow. Real sharp craft but maybe I'd want a Lycoming or Continental engine behind the prop. You know, something with a gazillion hours proven airtime. Even the Bombardier engines put into ultralights will fail and drop like stones every once in awhile.
So a 3.2 was used...........someone had some faith. Could they have used anything in addition to the bare block?

I mean the builder didn't even safety-WIRE the coil connectors in place that I can see. Notice anything else?

The valve cover gaskets don't seem to be leaking yet. And I hope he upgraded the IMG...

Nice PhotoShop (NOT!) That might get certification for 1G flight - Maybe.

I'm with Highland - Even a Subaru flat six would be better than that.

they charge $38,329.49 U.S. for the non-supercharged engine, I'm pretty sure for that price they've reworked the engine with new internals for a long service life.

Personally, I'd like to see one with the LS7 platform... Aluminum block, factory dry sump oiling, 505 hp, 475 ft-lbs, 26 mpg in a car, and from my experience with an LS1 Trans Am, GM's V8 is the stuff of legend. Add to that, the LS7 has titanium rods.

Cool looking setup! I didn't know it was possible to flip the intake manifold around. I'd like to hear it run with those open headers.:naughty: The only thing I'd like to 'fly' in with that is maybe a swamp buggy!:grinyes:

Joel