I am the Queen

Oh my god :flash: :devil: See, I rule the neons because I own one that soon will be worth 50k. When you come close then come talk to me, until then try to catch up. Neons are great cars, and when you can get your opinions taken out of you ass then you might be able to appreciate them. They are faster than civics and drive better than them. They were rated best car 95-99, so go take that and ram it up your exhast, have a nice day:)

Man never have I heard so much shit some out of one moronic mouth- Firstly a Neon worth US$50k :silly2: :silly2: :silly2: :silly2: :silly2: :silly2: How moronic can you get, why pay 50k for a half-decent piece of shit when you can have a C5 Vette or Impreza WRX that will spank it 10 times over?????
Rated best 95-99 Car by whom might I ask???? Probably from some dim-with American magazine, because What Car?, NZ AND UK Autocar, Wheels, Top Gear and CAR to name a few have given the Neon a a 1 OR 2 out of 5 rating, yet the Civic, Focus, Corolla, 3O7, Stilo and Golf all get 4 or 5 star ratings- Don't believe me??? All these magazines have websites- check them yourself

Also look at the bottom of most JD Power UK surveys and what do you find a little piece of shit called a Chrysler Neon

Here are some performance figures:

Civic 1.7 VTEC:
0-60mph
(sec) 9.6

Max speed
(mph) 125

Average mpg 42.2

Neon LX
0-60mph
(sec) 10.8

Max speed
(mph) 124

Average mpg 35.3

So looks like a certain someone got a little bit 0wned.

Hell your Neon is probably a 3-speed Auto version


:silly2: :silly2: :silly2:

Originally posted by Regan474
Oh my god :flash: :devil: See, I rule the neons because I own one that soon will be worth 50k. When you come close then come talk to me, until then try to catch up. Neons are great cars, and when you can get your opinions taken out of you ass then you might be able to appreciate them. They are faster than civics and drive better than them. They were rated best car 95-99, so go take that and ram it up your exhast, have a nice day:)


this must be the most BS i ever heard in my life, i can proabably run faster than u're NEON. don't get me wrong. i seen some quick ones. but jus they way u talk .. it seems like nothing but $hit is coming out of u're mouth.. who in the're right mind would have a $50k Neon or even invest a 1/3 of that in it.
Please bring u're little NEON to ny and let's go...REALLY with all the mouth.. u got... DON"T create u're own forum talking $hit and putting down peoples CARS> u don't know what we got in it. so bring u're little DODGE.. "so it can listen to my turbo whistle...":flipa: :finger:

By the way Regan?? r u a female? u sure sound like one?

Originally posted by Moss1O6GTi
Here are some performance figures:

Civic 1.7 VTEC:
0-60mph
(sec) 9.6

Max speed
(mph) 125

Average mpg 42.2

Neon LX
0-60mph
(sec) 10.8

Max speed
(mph) 124

Average mpg 35.3


Here's how my crappy neon compares.

'98 Neon Expresso 2.0 DOHC
0-60mph
(sec) 6.8

Max Speed
(mph) 140 (electronically limited)

Average mpg
41

That said, Regan is still http://christurbo.homestead.com/files/ghey.gif and full of crap.

here are some performance figures:

Civic 1.7 VTEC:
0-60mph
(sec) 9.6

Max speed
(mph) 125

Average mpg 42.2

Neon LX
0-60mph
(sec) 10.8

Max speed
(mph) 124

Average mpg 35.3

So looks like a certain someone got a little bit 0wned.

Hell your Neon is probably a 3-speed Auto version

:

first off get your facts straight b4 you try and run your mouth i am an owner of a 1995 vtec civic and a 2000 plymouth neon my neon can out do the civic the neon has a base 0-60 time of 8.8 seconds. and thats the 3-speed 132 horse engine your not the smartest hondas arent powerfull they have no horses under the hood and their weak in comparison to other compact cars. my neon can keep up with grand am gts and mustangs. ive owned every honda rice burner ive raced so once again get the facts straight

Originally posted by holmes


first off get your facts straight b4 you try and run your mouth i am an owner of a 1995 vtec civic and a 2000 plymouth neon my neon can out do the civic the neon has a base 0-60 time of 8.8 seconds. and thats the 3-speed 132 horse engine your not the smartest hondas arent powerfull they have no horses under the hood and their weak in comparison to other compact cars. my neon can keep up with grand am gts and mustangs. ive owned every honda rice burner ive raced so once again get the facts straight

Keep posting crap like this and you'll join reagan (If you already haven't) :rolleyes:

Moss1O6GTi, I don't know where U got Ur "performance figures" from, but they just seem to be from a atx. Oh well. Mines is faster, and I got quit a few kills under my belt. Feel free to ask me. I manage to piss off a lotta "sport car" drivers on the hightway too.(drivin skillz)

haha....:rolleyes: :monkeypisNeons blow bad. Sorry though. A Neon worth 50K in the US??? Thats the best i have heard. Now those performance readings don't look right. 0-60 for that Civic. Well im debating wheather or not i believe it.

This is nothing but a thread started as a flame, and it didn't need to be brought back from the dead. Also there are only about two people that have any idea what they are talking about in this thread.