2ND generation rx-7 --- v-8 conversion kit.

[MyGTR34]

Whoa, BIG words from a BIG man. I hope I didnt hurt your feeliings big guy! We dont care to know what kind of car you drove in high school, or how it ran or what it had on it. And Im not stupid you big Jack A$$! YOU seem to have a problem with people who disagree with you. cuz all youve basically complained about in all of your replies is how youve owned at least a million cars by the sounds of it, and how youve raced and autocrossed and all kinds of other bull, and even working with all of those people, you still have a problem grasping the fact that there are people who disagreee with you. Am I dense? I think not. Are YOU dense? YES! In the words of Alowicious the great... "Those who complain for no reason, have nothing to complain about. Those who complain for a reason, must know the guy with nothing to complain about." :bandit:

[VR6Turbo]

No fella, I didnt think all RX-7s were FDs.
AGAIN, I was just bringing up the VAST difference in performance between 3rd and 2nd gen. I saw you pics in the earlier posts, and unless you got some extreme body kit, your car is a 2nd gen. That was obvious.
Your incessant slaying of any other person who has an opinion that differs than yours, makes you a bigot. Its not that hard to understand. You think that just because you have experience with different cars and such, that you are right and that everyone else can kiss your ass because you are the 'King Of All Car Knowledge'. We understand that you are a middle aged man with a superiority complex. That doesnt mean that you should come to the RX-7 forum and tell everyone how terrible rotary engines are, but how you still love rotary cars so much.

[Chris V]

Your incessant slaying of any other person who has an opinion that differs than yours, makes you a bigot

Usually said by a person who's first post is an insult. Since the ONLY people I'm "slaying" are being closed minded and making factually WRONG statements, not merely everyone who has a different opinion than me (how you get that, I don't know, but it's probably related to you lack of brainpower).

You were insulting everyone who thinks different than you right off the bat, by saying anyone who replaces ANY rotary with a V8 is an idiot and an "anti-rotary bigot" Which is just retarded. But you're too dense to see that, aren't you? You couldn't factually refute anything I said (hell, you didn't even READ half of it), so all you could do was call me an anti rotary bigot, and think that I'M the one with the problem. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

AGAIN, I was just bringing up the VAST difference in performance between 3rd and 2nd gen. I saw you pics in the earlier posts, and unless you got some extreme body kit, your car is a 2nd gen

You responded to ME saying MY RX7 had a 143 hp engine by saying "it didn't have 143 hp. It had 255 hp." And you STILL won't acknowledge that. In effect, you were saying I was wrong about the 143 hp, and that since a stock Ford 5.0 in a late Mustang puts out 225, it's less than the stock engine in RX7s. As though ALL RX7s had 255 hp TT 13Bs. And as though ALL 302s has 225 hp. Since you KNEW my car was a 2nd gen, then your arguing about how much hp the 3rd gen has isirrelevant! And not germane to the discussion.

You think that just because you have experience with different cars and such, that you are right and that everyone else can kiss your ass because you are the 'King Of All Car Knowledge'. We understand that you are a middle aged man with a superiority complex. That doesnt mean that you should come to the RX-7 forum and tell everyone how terrible rotary engines are, but how you still love rotary cars so much.

And STILL you think I'm saying that rotary engines are terrible. Are you stupid? You just can't get it through your ignorant, closed minded head that I never said that!

Sorry that you are too stupid to deal with real knowledge. Get a clue, bozo.

[Chris V]

Whoa, BIG words from a BIG man. I hope I didnt hurt your feeliings big guy! We dont care to know what kind of car you drove in high school, or how it ran or what it had on it

Sure you did, or you wouldn't have thought to make the comments you did, little boy. You made a mistake in assumption, them tried to make an insulting comment based on that assumption. But then again, you're obviously too stupid to make real observations. You think I'm against the rotary engine, and make up some story about how I must have been traumatized by one when younger. I'm merely refuting that BS.

[quote] cuz all youve basically complained about in all of your replies is how youve owned at least a million cars by the sounds of it, and how youve raced and autocrossed and all kinds of other bull, and even working with all of those people,[quote]

?? Complained? You mean the sig? It's a joke! A way of stating that I've had a lot of cars, worked on a lot of cars, etc. SInce most people only onw a small amount...

Of course you wouldn't get it, you're a 'tard.

you still have a problem grasping the fact that there are people who disagreee with you.

Hello! There's disagereeing, and there's making factually incorrect statements! If the teacher tells you you're wrong when you say 4+7 is 29, he's not "disagreeing" with you. If your boss tells you you're wrong when you screw up a job, he's not just "disagreeing" with you. If I say you could fly, and tried to push you off a cliff, would you say I was right? Opinions can indeed BE wrong, when they are based on wrong information. If you say all horses have 6 legs, and I tell you you're wrong, it isn't just a "difference of opinion." What would you say if you went to the doctor for a heart attack and he said, "just rub grape jelley on your chest and you'll be fine!"

What if someone walked up to you and said it's his opinion you're a lazy theif? What if he said it's his opinion that, say, people like you should be killed, and brings out a gun? Would you say he's entitled to his opinion? He obviously disagrees with you. Is it ok for him to disagreee with you? What if instead, he though everyone else should think you should die, and posts it up everywhere in posters? Would his opinion of you be valid, simply because he disagrees with you?

[MyGTR34]

Hey that was pretty good,but what exactly are we talking about here? Im simply disagreeing with... oh wait I disagreed with nothing! I simply was starting a joke, just like your signature. Im not disagreeing with you and how some cars are more powerful than others, If anything Im telling you that I dont agree with putting a V-8 into an RX-7.

Sure you did, or you wouldn't have thought to make the comments you did, little boy. You made a mistake in assumption, them tried to make an insulting comment based on that assumption. But then again, you're obviously too stupid to make real observations. You think I'm against the rotary engine, and make up some story about how I must have been traumatized by one when younger. I'm merely refuting that BS.

And again, merely making another joke. I know that it may have offended you, and Im sure you knew that what you typed may have offended somebody who reads it that feels the same way we do, but you still replyed the way you did. No I dont think that I would like to have a doctor tell me to "Rub grape jelly on it and you'll be fine," But did you like it when your doctor told you its not your wifes fault, you actually DO need Viagra? Thats not disagreeing with you, thats merely the truth.:bandit:

[MyGTR34]

Hey by the way, I wasnt trying to say that you complained about ownng that many cars, I WAS ONLY SAYING THAT THE ONLY REASON YOU HAD ALL OF THAT EXPERIENCE WAS BECAUSE OF ALL OF THE DOMESTIC LEMONS THAT YOU HAVE OWNED AND HAVE HAD TO REBUILD OVER AND OVER AGAIN. And one would hope that after rebuilding something that many times,you would at least know SOMETHING about that car.

[VR6Turbo]

You continue to believe that I thouight that your car was a 3rd gen. NO FOR THE THIRD OF FOURTH TIME, -----I WAS JUST BRINGING UP THE VAST DIFFERENCE IN POWER-----You must have just skipped over that part EVERYTIME I wrote it. Ok-I will explain myself. I will use small words just for you.
1. FD3S -I would never put any other engine in it ever. I think that it is a part of the cars attraction, to me at least.
2. FC3S with blown engine -You apparently spend all of your money on beer, so you didnt have the money to put in a rotary. For the third or fourth time, YOU PROBABLY DID THE RIGHT THING WITH YOUR CAR.

I never said people who replaced rotaries with V8s were IDIOTS.

:monkeypis On you, your bullshit arguments, and your V8 FC.

[Evomaniac]

come on guy's no need to be hostile, this is a non-flaming forum... REMEMBER THAT!
-Dave

[MyGTR34]

I think that we all need to just step back and relax and have a normal forum, like all the others. Maybe we could continue the thread by talking about the v-8 engine swap in an RX-7 or something, which happens to be what this thread was started for. :alien2:

[Evomaniac]

ain't that the truth my brotha.:huh:
-Dave

[Sleepy RX]

So, if RX's were originally made with V8's and Ford's and Chevy's were made with Rotary's would you guys be arguing to keep a V8 in the RX?

The way I look at it: RX 3rd gen is an awesome vehicle but the motor can get pricey. For me to make a better RX 3rd gen I'm putting in a V8. Just my opinion.

I haven't owned a 100 cars in 20 years but every car that I have owned, for the most part, I pulled out what I didn't like and replaced with something I liked better. Reality is, every one has there preference and I think it's great we can have a debate like this!!!

Can you guys really tell a 1% shift in weight? Better watch your fuel levels!!

[Evomaniac]

v8 on a 3rd generation rx7 would be a monster especially with a 427 big block and with 2 greddy t88 turbo's, I wonder if anyone has done it before, I've only seen it in the single turbo form in race car's but how about two, too much lag I guess and with 200 shot nos it would remove that lag hehe so you basically have a 1000hp+ monster.
-dave

[phatdex]

I believe it is blasphemy to put a V8 in an RX7 but to each their own. The handling of the car would be way worse. My RX3 had a 13B turbo from a second gen and I was getting 330RWHP with just a high flowed turbo. This engine originally only had 205Hp at the engine. It is not hard to make a 13B turbo get up and go.

[Evomaniac]

yeah i know what you mean when i dynoed my engine(93 stock rx7 r1) I got 225rwhp and after that I got a pettit ecu, a k&n filter,apexi n1 exhaust,hks downpipe,I got Pettit race ported engine 3mm seals,Greddy Profec B, HKS turbo timer,Greddy blow off valve,and a intercooler, my rx7 dynoed in at 360rwhp so I guess it does make a big difference when you do some mod's to it and LET IT BREATH.these were the best bang for the buck mod's I got for it and I had spent nearly 2k to get this done including the oil change(synthetic racing oil), ngk racing brand new spark plug's,mgk wires, and the the new wiper's I bought when I got the car, there was a few problem's it had but It was fixed, no problem's with the engine though.After a month of owning it I had pted for a 75 shot nos"wet" system, I had it for 2 year's and it did well but I sold it later on, I sell my car's soon after they're not as challenging as before.
-Dave

[GTi-VR6_A3]

Originally posted by phatdex
I believe it is blasphemy to put a V8 in an RX7 but to each their own. The handling of the car would be way worse.

funny seems as though everyone that has doen it says it handles the same or better

-GTi-VR6_A3