|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Non Specific This is the forum to post and generalized racing questions. |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#46
11-09-2006, 07:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 950+ rwhp S2000
Quote:
__________________
ECNATSISER AL AVIV 
|
|
#47
11-10-2006, 12:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 950+ rwhp S2000
It's true, the car is very peaky. I don't notice it at all though. In daily driving situations I can still keep ahead of traffic without going into VTEC, and when you're driving hard, you keep the car in VTEC (6000-9000 rpms). If low end is an issue, than you're either in the wrong gear or in the wrong car
__________________
2001 Honda S2000 New Formula Red Mods: Engine: Comptech Air Intake Box, miscellanous chrome dress up pieces Suspension: Comptech front strut tower bar Exterior: Grillcraft grill, lots of wax Interior: Rick's leather console cover, Muz one-piece luxury floormats, Rick's windscreen, Electronics/Audio: Polk speakers Wheels/tires: 18" SSR Competition wheels with 225/40 and 255/35 tires 
|
|
#48
11-10-2006, 01:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 950+ rwhp S2000
see that is how a S2000 is suppose to sound.. like a mean car, not like a can of wasp. also one of my best friends has a F20c powered S2K and you have to rev that thing to 4K to move anywhere when just driving around town. mean while i shift my car at 2K and just let the tq do the work.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX  Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
#49
11-10-2006, 02:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 950+ rwhp S2000
Quote:
 jk
__________________
 XBOX Live Gamertag: atxsbigwalt add me!!
|
|
#51
11-11-2006, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 950+ rwhp S2000
nothing wrong with a 2.4 liter 4 cylinder that feels more torquier then most japanese 3.0 v6's even when i'm off boost.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
