Warplane and Curious George

[grantrl78]

I am thinking that you might have have alot
of "school" before you can finish that one up.
Saved by the bell as it were
And if you recreate it with with the airbrush,
I will be like "hmmmz"that IS 100% from scratch.
Seems that you left out the important stuff though,
like the painting part.

If you airbrush 100% of the jet and paint a new background
that is your painting. Period.

You are confusing painting with ps and using photoshop
to make chops. That seems to be a common
problem around this forum. Certain rules like you "cant use photoshop"
in the design contests reflect this misconception.
It must be "hand drawn". What else do you use to draw with
on a wacom, your foot ?
It is a fundamental misunderstanding of photoshop
and of art in general. The only thing out of your head is cartoons,
really stylized stuff and bad realism. Everything else
has a strong reference.

There is a book that you might want to
read by david hockney
about the camera obscura called "secret knowledge".
The first thing non painting gallery owners tried to do was smear
hockney because his theories might hurt their bottom line. When the
fact is that realism was born in art with that particular optical tracing
device that he wrote about.

Ever heard of jan vermeer? He was a toon maker too it
seems - that hack!!!! Or sorayama? Or phillip castle?
I guess they do toons too!
How dare they try to pass off those images as their own.
I am with them. A hack toon maker

[ClearHooter]

"The Laws of Robotics"..... I've heard of that but have always considered it to be one of those things in sci-fi books and movies that bring in a conflict of morals to the story. This implies that the science has evolved to a point that the robot would have moral conflicts. I think we have much more to worry about terroist acquiring radioactive materials or a nuke or bio-weapons and setting of a dirty or a catostrophic blast or a bio attack long before they get a robot that can decern the difference between right and wrong. Granted they have robots that can be used for attacks now but they are still guided by humans and its morals are that of the controlers.

I'm not "pro war." I'm pro "Rights of Man." When a group of people want to infringe upon these "Rights" the situation becomes non-negotiable. The way this is going it has a possibility of going on for generations....Or ending in a big flash. I may be trying to simplify a very complex situation but there are logical political solutions but they require people thinking for themselves and that's something they don't seem to do over there. There are non-nuclear military solutions but thats something our government doesn't seem to be willing to do, since politicians want to "win the peace." The first is much more preferred than the latter.

[ClearHooter]

OOOoo! OOOooo! I like the rocket salvo and the frame overlap. If you softend the line of the outside, horizontal, tail-stabalizer on the rocket side a bit it would give the rocket some trajectory. The smoke would pass over the tail before the rocket dropped and went on its way.