Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2002, 02:35 AM   #46
Tom_S8
AF Enthusiast
 
Tom_S8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tom_S8
Quote:
Originally posted by Moppie

And this thread is about the NSX vs the NON Turbo version of the 911.
In which case money aside the NSX is by far the faster car. (Its also about 100 times more reliable).
Ermm... i don't hear ya :finger4:...btw about reliablity... NSX is very expensive to mantain... and check some milages etc. NSXs have like 30,000 km , 50,000 km etc. and you can find porsches from the same year that have 130,000 150,000 or even 200,000 on the clock... and they still run on the original engine... that also ... ermm... means they're a bit more pleasure to drive...
And get one thing straight- i find NSX a very nice car , good engineered and i'd love to have one. I'm not a hater... But for this kind of money it really is slow and i could buy faster and more reliable cars for that money...
Tom_S8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2002, 02:51 AM   #47
longlivetheZ
AF Enthusiast
 
longlivetheZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: a
Posts: 2,979
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to longlivetheZ Send a message via MSN to longlivetheZ
Beautiful car, NISSANSPDR. What's wrong with turbos? Change the oil regularly and you're all good. Plus, slap some mods on it and feel that those turbos spool...ah...it's glorious! Still though....Both cars look the same minus the spoiler. Absolutly beautiful cars, aren't they. LONG LIVE THE 300 ZX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S...Where in Florida?
longlivetheZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2002, 04:54 AM   #48
ales
Forza Schumacher
 
ales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 6,695
Thanks: 9
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom_S8
Ok you want to really know it... check it out:

http://www.rs4.org/rs4/rs4-fearture/...ring-times.htm
...
Lovely stats, Tom, thatnks!
__________________

Would love to resume my duties as AF's own official thread bastardizer!!!
1:29:53.435 || 207.316 || 310.596
ales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2002, 08:45 AM   #49
Ssom
AF Fanatic
 
Ssom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland
Posts: 4,232
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Ssom Send a message via AIM to Ssom
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom_S8



And get one thing straight- i find NSX a very nice car , good engineered and i'd love to have one. I'm not a hater... But for this kind of money it really is slow and i could buy faster and more reliable cars for that money...
I have just had a talk with a former 911 Carrera 4S and current NSX owner today and have come to this conclusion:

Sorry but there is no way in hell that you are going to find a car more reliable than a Honda, my dad's new business partner (and fellow car-nut) operates a 1992 NSX 3.0L VTEC V6 and once owned a 930 (?) Carrera 4S, I was having a little talk with him today and he said he had done 70,000Km in the NSX over the years and it had never let him down, except for a minor exhaust rattle in the left pipe, which was promptly fixed, but the Carrera was a nightmare to own and maintain, with constant bills and steep fuel costs as the car aged, the NSX however sips fuel in comparision and has only needed $300 in repairs (For the exhaust).

Anyway here are some 996, 993 and NSX stats

996 Carrera
Base Price $65 000 usd
Displacement -3387 cc / 206.7 cu in
Torque 349.8 nm / 258.0 ft lbs @ 4600 rpm
Power- 220.7 kw / 296.0 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Gear Type 6-Speed Manual
1st Gear Ratio- 3.82:1
2nd Gear Ratio- 2.20:1
3rd Gear Ratio- 1.52:1
4th Gear Ratio- 1.22:1
5th Gear Ratio- 1.02:1
6th Gear Ratio- 0.84:1
Final Drive Ratio- 3.44:1
Redline 7300 rpm
HP / Liter 87.39 bhp per litre
Curb Weight 1324 kg / 2919 lbs
Drive Wheels- Rear Engine / RWD

Top Speed 280.0 kph / 174.0 mph 0 - 60 mph 4.6 seconds
0 - ¼ mile 13.2 seconds 0 - 100 mph 11.6 seconds
Lateral Acceleration 0.91g EPA City/Hwy 19 / 32 mpg

NSX T/Top
Base Price $88 000 USD
Displacement 3179 cc / 194.0 cu in
Power 216.3 kw / 290.1 bhp @ 7100 rpm
Torque 303.7 nm / 224.0 ft lbs @ 5500 rpm
Gear Type 6-Speed Manual
1st Gear Ratio- 3.067:1
2nd Gear Ratio- 1.957:1
3rd Gear Ratio- 1.429:1
4th Gear Ratio- 1.125:1
5th Gear Ratio- 0.914:1
6th Gear Ratio- 0.718:1
Final Drive Ratio- 4.062:1
Redline 8000 rpm
Curb Weight 1433 kg / 3159 lbs
HP / Liter 91.26 bhp per litre
Drive Wheels Mid Engine / RWD

Top Speed 270.4 kph / 168.0 mph 0 - 60 mph 5.1 seconds
0 - ¼ mile 13.5 seconds 0 - 100 mph 11.6 seconds
Lateral Acceleration 0.89g EPA City/Hwy 17 / 24 mpg

993
Base Price $59 000 usd
Displacement 3600 cc / 219.7 cu in
Power 202.8 kw / 272 bhp @ 6100 rpm
Torque 329.5 nm / 243.0 ft lbs @ 5000 rpm
Gear Type 6-Speed Manual
1st Gear Ratio- 3.82:1
2nd Gear Ratio- 2.05:1
3rd Gear Ratio- 1.41:1
4th Gear Ratio- 1.12:1
5th Gear Ratio- 0.92:1
6th Gear Ratio- 0.78:1
Final Drive Ratio- 3.44:1
Curb Weight 1390 kg / 3064 lbs
Redline 6800 rpm
HP / Liter- 75.56 bhp per litre
Drive Wheels- Rear Engine / RWD

Top Speed 270 kph / 167.8 mph 0 - 60 mph 5.2 seconds
0 - ¼ mile 13.8 seconds 0 - 100 mph 13.3 seconds
Lateral Acceleration- N/A EPA City/Hwy 17 / 25 mpg


So really the NSX and 996 are rather neck and neck, while the 993 is wheezing at the effort to catch up with them

Like you said though Tom, I aren't hating on Porsche, I would LOVE to own a 996 Turbo, I just think when it comes to Carrera vs. NSX, the Honda is the superior car
Ssom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2002, 10:50 AM   #50
Tom_S8
AF Enthusiast
 
Tom_S8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tom_S8
Quote:
Originally posted by Moss1O6GTi


So really the NSX and 996 are rather neck and neck, while the 993 is wheezing at the effort to catch up with them

That's why the 996 is 17 seconds faster then the 3.2 6-speed NSX on road course and 993 is more than 6 seconds faster (i think the coupe could run around 8.25 so it's almost 10 seconds)... i see a lot of logic in this...

Btw maybe your dad's friend had some bad car... you know even the most reliable cars , if you buy the "wrong" one then it'll be braking down all the time , and then you buy a car that is told to be "the least reliable" and it can run forever... so maybe he just have had bad luck... Right now as we speak , i have just beaten a NSX in my S8 today , which is a heavy sedan... but i think it's the driver who had no balls , because i beat him in corners... but the first thing i did when i have seen that car...it reminded me off this thread... it looks stunning you can't deny it , but it sucked (i don't know if it was the car or the driver , but i'd say both) i have easily overtaken it (he tried not to let me do it) and then i went through a corner , and he almost crashed in the same corner... what a dumbass... he lost traction , but somehow he luckily made it and he still wanted to chase me... i didn't see him in my mirrors after 3 or 4 more corners so i slowed down , and after some time he appeared in my mirror again , so i let him pass , overtaken him once again and never seen him again... but i can tell , he was pissed... when i looked on his face , oh man... it was sooooo funny... he looked like that --------->
Tom_S8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2002, 10:09 PM   #51
Moppie
Master Connector
 
Moppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 11,781
Thanks: 95
Thanked 101 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Moppie Send a message via AIM to Moppie Send a message via Yahoo to Moppie
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom_S8

But for this kind of money it really is slow and i could buy faster and more reliable cars for that money...

We have already covered this Tom. Yes in most of Europe the NSX is incredibly over priced, and for the same money you could most deffintly buy a faster car.
And because of the differnces in exchange rates and international trade laws you can not compare the two cars on Price.

Here in NZ I could buy several used NSX's for the cost of one used 911.

I am also currently working in a workshop that specialises in Historic, classic and exotic cars. I can tell you right now there isnt a super car out there that is more relaible or cheaper to maintain than an NSX.
Try looking up prices for used porsche parts on e-bay. We're looking at wrecking road going legal 911's just to send the parts to the US and make money on them.

And I never called you a hater. I just suggested that you prehaps need to look out side of the square your thinking in, and accept that there are better cars out there than the 911, and that yes one of them might just be made by the Japanese.
And untill you get some experiance behind the wheel of a much wider variety of differnt cars, and have some experiance working on cars and understanding what makes them great and what dosnt you need to listen to what others with more experiance are saying.
There is more to what a makes a car great than can ever be put down on paper.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
Moppie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2002, 01:21 AM   #52
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
for a note to tom on the times around nurburgring (i think that is where the times were from)

the nsx stock only had 16in wheels until this year... porsche had 17 and 18in wheels available for a while... that would make a hugeass difference on the track...

not puttin the porsche down, but if the nsx had the bigger wheels and better tires, it would be closer, or lighter wheels... as porsche is known to make hollow spoke wheels that are lighter than hell... *not on all car, but they do have them*

and on your kill of the nsx...

some folks can't drive...
and your s8 is a wicked ass car anyways, and i would love to drive it...

but the thread, i believe, is about the 1/4 times of the cars... 8 minute laps are impressive, but how many times are you gonna find 8 minutes next to an nsx with a porsche averaging 150ish?

and one more thing on the times... i usually don't like times posted by different drivers, i prefer the one driver rule. one guy drives the cars, both, all, whatever, and that way it is a bit more equal. for example, if you took one of the porsche drivers, and put him in the nsx, maybe he would get a quicker time out of it...

i dunno... but you get the idea... i'm not tryin to deny anything you said, just pointing out arguable points....
flylwsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2002, 02:42 PM   #53
Tom_S8
AF Enthusiast
 
Tom_S8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tom_S8
Quote:
Originally posted by flylwsi

the nsx stock only had 16in wheels until this year... porsche had 17 and 18in wheels available for a while... that would make a hugeass difference on the track...

not puttin the porsche down, but if the nsx had the bigger wheels and better tires, it would be closer, or lighter wheels... as porsche is known to make hollow spoke wheels that are lighter than hell... *not on all car, but they do have them*

Please... compare weight of 18" rims to a weight of 16" rims... bigger rims are waaaaaaaay heavier than smaller rims , but besides that you're right bigger wheels could make a difference but i'm not sure what year model NSXs they used there... anyway , i think this is a good rule , because those are the best times got with specified cars... so f.e some driver is driving porsches all the time , he knows how to drive them the fastest and most efficent way so he can pull of the close to car's limits time , and another driver who feels NSX better can get better times with NSX and then compare them... Anyway as for judgement...
Europe - porsche is the winner
Japan , Australia , Oceania - NSX is the winner
US - they can drive their "sport" pick up trucks :finger:
Faster on track - porsche 993
Faster in straight line - Honda NSX
Faster overall (both track and stragiht line) - porsche 996
Just wait for the new NSX tho , so we can compare it with the 320 hp 911s and E46 M3s... And makea another pointless thread debate...

Anyway the starter of this thread wanted a comparsion between NSX and 300 hp 996 and here the 996 wins (is faster on the track and in straight line)
but i agree to what Moppie said... stats on paper can't give you a feeling of what the car really is...
Tom_S8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2002, 03:08 PM   #54
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
on the wheels...
if it is anything but the brand new 03 (?)... they are not as big as a porsche, so that makes a diff...


the lightweight hollow porsche 18s are pretty light...

not sure on the exact weights... but i know that you can get 18s that are just as light as a 16...

i still feel that the race would be pretty close if not won by the nsx... i guess i would have to see it with the US spec cars... not like the best motoring jdm cars...
flylwsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2002, 03:09 PM   #55
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
oh, and besides my prelude, i happen to have one of those sport trucks...

94 s10 xcab v6 5spd...

quick little truck.. and it's dropped so it handles...
flylwsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2002, 02:59 PM   #56
Tom_S8
AF Enthusiast
 
Tom_S8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tom_S8
Quote:
Originally posted by flylwsi
oh, and besides my prelude, i happen to have one of those sport trucks...

94 s10 xcab v6 5spd...

quick little truck.. and it's dropped so it handles...
Excuse me , but i find "quick trucks that handle" quite pointless... no offence , it's probably a quite cool car , but a truck should be a vehicle to move/deliver big stuff that doesn't fit in passenger cars and nothing less , nothing more , nothing else , nothing other....

Anyway... about the race , i gave you times for nurburring and porsches happen to be better....
Tom_S8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2002, 11:33 AM   #57
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
considering that my truck, even with it's sport suspsension still hauls refrigerators, couches, and alot of musical equipment for a friends band, it still does it's job. and it looks hella nice doing it.

so what is wrong with having a dual purpose vehicle that has great accel and handling, and will haul your mother's couch?
flylwsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2002, 04:35 PM   #58
Tom_S8
AF Enthusiast
 
Tom_S8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tom_S8
Quote:
Originally posted by flylwsi
considering that my truck, even with it's sport suspsension still hauls refrigerators, couches, and alot of musical equipment for a friends band, it still does it's job. and it looks hella nice doing it.

so what is wrong with having a dual purpose vehicle that has great accel and handling, and will haul your mother's couch?

Ok that's :coolguy: , but trucks are to heavy to handle good and it's just the physics , you can't do a damn thing about it... i'm sure it must handle better then 90% trucks out there , and also better than many passenger cars , but it's not sport by any means...
Tom_S8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 05:54 PM   #59
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
considering that it's an s10 and weighs in around 3k lbs, it isn't that much heavier than a lot of sports cars out there... and it's lighter than most of the heavyweight cars like vettes...
flylwsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 12:03 PM   #60
Tom_S8
AF Enthusiast
 
Tom_S8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tom_S8
I don't know about lbs but my 952 weights around 1250 kg (but it's a cabriolet.... coupes are lighter)
Tom_S8 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porsche 911 GT2 ericlim1133 Completed Projects / Gallery 5 04-07-2009 12:13 AM
Porsche GT3 vs Acura NSX-R vs Mitsubishi Evo9 MR vs Nissan Nismo Z380RS vs Mines Niss trev0006 Car Videos 0 10-04-2007 03:40 PM
Acura NSX-R vs BMW M6 vs Porsche 997 Turbo vs Lamborghini Gallardo trev0006 Car Videos 3 09-16-2007 05:31 AM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts