Burnt by a stang :( - Page 3

ikeyballz · #31 12-13-2005, 02:47 AM

lol yeah, i gotta say..im not dissing on them..im just saying i got pwnd..but ive seen 5.0's go super fast..so yeah..

doodad · #32 12-13-2005, 12:27 PM

man, celica GT?

come on... dont fight with kids... they are piece of cake man.. celica GT? with 140 horsepower?

even the fastest ones GTS have 180 hp. man.. dont make me lough.. unles they are not modified, dont even spend gas and waist time wiith them man..

about mustangs.. l got 97 formula, and my girl can beat 2004 and less mustang GTs and also 2005 Mustang (not GT) they are not as fast as firebirds..

about cobra, man, turbo supras can fight with them.. l dont think firebirds could beat cobras.. becuase they are special kind of mustangs.. and they have totally different kind of engine then other GT's. also they got SVT SUPERCHARGED COBRA.. oh man.. they are damn fast..

but l am still saying expect cobras, mustangs are not as fast as firebird.. because when l decided to buy a sports car, my wife told me to buy a firebird and l said why? and she said we can get u a mustang if u want to but mustangs are not gonna be as fast as firebirds.. by the way MY WIFE IS WORKING FOR FORD MOTOR COMPANY AS A DELAER OPERATIONS MANAGER.. she knows everything.. and l decided to get a firebird..

thank you..

unicyclemidget11 · #33 12-13-2005, 04:14 PM

supras are actually kinda slow stock for the amount of money you would pay for them. Theyre no match for the s/c cobras. more like the 98 and older cobras, maybe 99-02 mustang cobras.

ikeyballz · #34 12-14-2005, 12:38 AM

yeah..supras are slow stock, but who has stock supras :o its so much $$ to get one, everyone who has one is loaded ++ does choke stuff to it...

doodad · #35 12-14-2005, 10:24 AM

so stock trans am or formula ( lt1) can beat a stock supra?

man they got 320 horsepower (stock..)

daveshapellSVT · #36 12-14-2005, 01:00 PM

04 mustang gt's run low 14's where as your formula may run high 14's.

doodad · #37 12-14-2005, 07:24 PM

man,

LT1 is faster than 04 and low mustang GTs. (stock)

formulafirebird126 · #38 12-15-2005, 01:13 PM

is an 89 formula 5.0 5spd faster than a 94-99 stang gt?

~redlinels1~ · #39 12-15-2005, 01:51 PM

Don't underestimate the mustang sitting next to you at the light guys. I was completely destroyed by a shitty looking 5.0. Its cheap as hell to make a mustang fast.

Lets not make any excuses that an 03-04 Cobra has a blower. The car came from the factory with small displacement and a blower. GM makes cars N/A with big displacement. Thats how the cars were made so just leave it at that. Thats like the Cobra guys saying we need nitrous to go fast. Power is power...it doesnt matter where it comes from. Also, put yourself in the shoes of a Cobra owner. Would you really complain if GM decided to slap a blower on an f-body? I didn't think so.

doodad · #40 12-15-2005, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by formulafirebird126

is an 89 formula 5.0 5spd faster than a 94-99 stang gt?

l dont think so.. 94-99 mustang is faster than 89 formula, trans-am

ikeyballz · #41 12-16-2005, 03:52 AM

yeah, the 94+ is pretty leet..they droppd the displacement but made it higher revvin..OHC engine...imo, its the closest import V8..but hey, if it makes power, id like it

daveshapellSVT · #42 12-17-2005, 05:58 PM

yea the 94-99 gt's were faster. 260hp vs. 230. in a lighter car. the car you really want is a 99-2002 Cobra. 4.6 Dohc V8 that redlines at 7200rpm. i owned one and i was running 13.3's with bald tires and a few minor bolt ons. great car.

ikeyballz · #43 12-19-2005, 08:55 PM

haha sounds sweet...7200 rpm eh.. my bird redlines at 6500

daveshapellSVT · #44 12-21-2005, 03:54 PM

yea that engine is sweet. i dyno'd 279whp stock.

ikeyballz · #45 12-21-2005, 05:42 PM

daamn. fords finally getting things right huh.. after the fbody dies

so sad. now theres no more challenger to the 'stang eithier.. (new, neway..)

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD