If you were to vote again?

[fredjacksonsan]

Exactly; if the people are not satisfied with any candidate, they can have their say by forcing new candidates to be put on the ballot. This would probably drag out the election for a few months, but is more what democracy is about .

[Hypsi87]

I nominated Redneck383

[Ace$nyper]

I still would 3rd party it.

I looked around and found somthing I supported and voted for what I belived in.

[Fleet 472]

Originally Posted by Marc04

Iraq has WMD's does that sound familiar? I don't understand why his Vietnam exp. is a sham, any other Vietnam vet's exp a sham?

Except that every major intelligence organization in the world also said that Iraq had WMD. Including the U.N. intelligence, Russian, British and even Chinese intelligence.
Also, many Democrats, from 1998 to 2003 also said Iraq had WMD:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD and the missiles to deliver them."
- Pres. Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's WMD."
Pres. Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Hussein has been engaged in the development of WMD technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspections process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept., 23, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of WMD in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- John F. Kerry, Oct. 9, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. He has also given aid, comfort and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton, Oct. 10, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime... He has continued to deceit... So the threat of Saddam with WMD is real."
Sen. John F. Kerry, Jan. 23, 2003

I guess all of those Democrats were "lying," too!

[lamehonda]

UHHH,

I voted for Nader

Everyone else sucks

[-GS-]

Originally Posted by Jimster

I'm 50:50 on this, On one hand, a good chunk of America is closed minded, ignorant and afraid of change, on the other hand, Britain have had a female prime-minister before, in the same way that I believe Indonesia have also had one and India almost had one.


So it'd be interesting to see what happens.

India did have one, Indira Gandhi.

As for this, im not american, but i would have voted for Bush. Why? Well because hes allready started all this, and i dont think that Kerry could have carried it on.