Ferrari Modena, Porsche 996 Turbo or Honda NSX ?

[Polygon]

Ferrari or Porsche, accept no substitutes.

[TatII]

hold up, i realized the price tag. since when was a 996 turbo only 120K area? aren't those atleat 200K thats the last tiem i checked. and if its just a standard porshe, a NSX type S zero will blow those out of the water. i'm dead ass. and i would pick the NSX if it was to be those low end cars. i thought you guys were talkin about the real deal porshe oops.

[flylwsi]

i'm pretty sure the turbo is in the 111k range... i'll find it...

[Stefanel1]

Porsche 911 Turbo : 129 750 €.

[TatII]

so yoru tellin me that a twin turbo 420hp boxer engine with AWD and a auto adjusting wing is only 120K area? then why would the ferrar cost more if its less advanced?

[flylwsi]

what's the name on the car? oh that's right...

[flylwsi]

i'm having a hell of a time finding the orig price, b/c no sites are helping...
i did find a small excerpt from a listing for a used 2002 turbo...
"Original Window was over $129K plus the paid lux tax!!!"

so, it's not hella pricey.

[TatII]

whoa i just went to the official site, and it is only 116K not bad~

[crayzayjay]

116 thousand dollars for a Porsche 911 Turbo? That's fantastic value. And yes, it is technically more advanced than the Modena

[YellowMaranello]

I don't think I could give up the chance to have the Modena. But like everyone said, the 996 is a LOT more practical. In my mind though, Ferrari rules all.

[Deadly Mantis]

I'd take the Porsche. It seems much more practical than a Ferrari.

[Miltown_Racer]

Does an NSX-R count? If it does, i'll take the NSX-R. The 2002 NSX-R runs 12.8 stock with only 290 HP and some 224 TQ. Not bad for the HP/TQ and for only about 80,000-90,000.

The ferrari costs 100+ G's and it's not even fast for it's price...probably slower than the NSX-R. Saw a yellow ferrari modena got whooped by a Supra TT with only basic stuff.

I dunno about the porshe..but too costly..and probably performs only a bit better than the NSX-R

[Neutrino]

Originally posted by Miltown_Racer


The ferrari costs 100+ G's and it's not even fast for it's price...probably slower than the NSX-R. Saw a yellow ferrari modena got whooped by a Supra TT with only basic stuff.

Ok stop watching fast and the furious we saw it too. And yes the 360 modena is pretty weak for a drag race but take it on a track and will spank almost anything. Also lets not forget that the modena is most likelly the best aerodynamically corect car in the world.

[flylwsi]

if we want to get into it...

that ferrari was not a 360 in the movie (i'm pretty sure it wasn't)

and... lieberman's supra has about 600+hp... i would hope it would be a stock ferrari in a race...

and a supra with the bpu will have at least the same power as a ferrari... sooo. it would make sense in a straight line.

however... take a corner. who's gonna win? not the supra most likely.

i'm an nsx fan for the exoticism that surrounds it... you see em less than ferraris. but i'd take the porsche...

[crayzayjay]

It was an F355 in the F&F and i for one was rooting for it to win.... of course i knew it wouldnt, all the spotty ricers eating their popcorn would have been disappointed and added another 4 turbos to their car to ensure it doesnt happen to their comedy-Civic.. so the jap-car wins.. but the Ferrari looked infinitely better, sounded better and... hold on, what am i doing? am i really responding to this? a ferrari vs a t*y*ta? those two words shouldnt be said in the same sentence. and the guy saying a 360 isnt fast for the money... boy are you an idiot! and that the Porsche performs slightly better than the NSX-R? what are you saying its not worth the money? Youre buying a piece of history right there with the 996 TT. you dont like it? drive a civic!