-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 02-02-2006, 08:03 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

[quote=GForce957]99-04 gt is a low 14 second for the most part, ive never seen 13's out of them, but its possible i guess


04 str-4
225 hp.
2900 lbs.
front wheel drive.

LT1 trans am/ formula
285 hp.
3311 lbs.
rear wheel drive


so u mean srt-4 is faster ?

l thought LT1s were way faster... l am really confused now man!!!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-02-2006, 08:11 PM
GForce957's Avatar
GForce957 GForce957 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

i believe the 225 is underrated.

You have an automatic with 2.73 gears correct? thats gonna slow u down

I would say they are very close, ive never seen a race between either so i dunno for sure, but i think the srt is faster
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-02-2006, 08:12 PM
Elk's Avatar
Elk Elk is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by endlessheart666
His mods were catback exhaust, K&N intake system, Cobra tranny???, and some new tires. He was claming about 260hrspwr and 300-310tq. Mine were exactly as listed except no stage 1( that was sitting on my doorstep when I got back )
I'm going to call BS on the power he said it had. The 96 Mustang only made 215 HP and 285 lb-ft torque at the crank stock. I don’t see a catback and K&N adding enough HP to get 260 300 at the wheels. About the Cobra transmission as far as I know the N/A Cobra and the Mustang GT used the same transmission, but don’t see how it would effect his cars performance.
__________________
Buick Park Avenue, 1997
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-02-2006, 08:18 PM
Igovert500's Avatar
Igovert500 Igovert500 is offline
blue + red light magnet
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

A 96 GT with flowmasters and K&N is a 14.9 car on a good day. Nice kill nonetheless.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4
-K&N FIPK
-Proboost mbc
-Cusco front + rear strut bars
-Greddy type-s
-ATR downpipe
-no cats
-15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly.

Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-02-2006, 08:20 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by GForce957
i believe the 225 is underrated.

You have an automatic with 2.73 gears correct? thats gonna slow u down

I would say they are very close, ive never seen a race between either so i dunno for sure, but i think the srt is faster

well yeah l got auto 2.73 gear. but l didnt say that for myself. l said it for every LT1 trans ams. manual tranny. and l still dont believe that srt-4s are faster than lt1s man.

mine has 128k miles on it and l dont think l have 285 hp. anymore and l am not using it for racing but it is still fast anyway.. so l am not saying that l can beat them. but l beated a 99-04 stang GT. with this high mileage auto car. maybe he wasnt a good driver but l got him.

l will post a new thread and ask this on firebird forum and l will see what they think about this and l let u know guys.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:01 PM
GForce957's Avatar
GForce957 GForce957 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

yeah, i dont really know so im just going by a guess.

Also, didnt the manuals come with 3.42 gears?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:05 PM
Turbodog97's Avatar
Turbodog97 Turbodog97 is offline
Just a Neon
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elk
I'm going to call BS on the power he said it had. The 96 Mustang only made 215 HP and 285 lb-ft torque at the crank stock. I don’t see a catback and K&N adding enough HP to get 260 300 at the wheels. About the Cobra transmission as far as I know the N/A Cobra and the Mustang GT used the same transmission, but don’t see how it would effect his cars performance.

Edit> I just found some more stuff about his car, it had a larger MAF, full exhaust rather than catback, 3.96 rear end...??(something like that). I'm not sure if any of that means anything but whatever...
__________________

05 Srt4
Agp 3147 w/supporting mods


97 Mx-5
T28, hks man, ebay int/pipes, rfl bov, xtd 6 puck, 3" magnaflow, msd timing box,
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:10 PM
breckboarder55's Avatar
breckboarder55 breckboarder55 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

Im enlesshearts friend, who was in the car with him during the time. He was only boosting about 14 psi. (vs. 17 for stock) The mustang was killing him off the line and through the first two gears but in third imidiatly passed him back up and would have put bus lengths on him if we had the room. Guy in the mustangs cool though.
__________________
1987 MAzda RX-7 TII built motor, every bolt on, big turbo, standalone, everything, exc.exc.exc. Easily 400+
1955 Dodge Royal Lancer Super Red Top HEMI
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:14 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

man,

l just asked there and one guy answered (he knows better than many people) he said if they are both bone stock it would be drivers race..

now l am convinced. they re fast too.. and l really dont know about how manuals came.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:01 PM
youngvr4's Avatar
youngvr4 youngvr4 is offline
STREET RACING GURU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

srt-4 can hit 13's and also 99- 04 stang gt's
but were talkin 13.9-8 13.7 is unlikely

Gt's stats
Engine : V8, SOHC, front engine RWD
Displacement : 4,605 cc
Valve : 16 valves, 2 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 5-spd manual, 4-spd automatic
Fuel economy : city - 18 mpg
highway - 24-26 mpg

Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Live axle
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs

Horsepower : 260 hp @ 5250 rpm
Torque : 302 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Redline : unknown

Top speed : 140 mph(estimated)
0-60 mph : 6.1 sec.
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 98.0 mph
60-0 braking distance : 135 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.84 g

Curb Weight : 3273-3317 lbs(coupe), 3429-3477 lbs(convertible)
Overall length : 183.5 in.
Wheelbase : 101.3 in.
Overall Width : 73.1 in.
Height : 53.1 in.(coupe), 53.5 in.(convertible)

Srt-4 stats

2003-2005 Dodge Neon SRT-4


Created by Dodge's PVO team, the SRT-4 powered by a 2.4L turbo engine. The engine, underrated at 215 hp in 2003, is now rated at 230 hp and comes standard with an LSD for 2004. Numerous Mopar upgrades are also available.

Base price : $18,970 Get a free price quote

Engine : 4 cylinder, turbocharged, DOHC, front engine FWD
Displacement : 2,429 cc
Valve : 16 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 5-spd manual
Fuel economy : city - 22 mpg
highway - 30 mpg

Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent multilink
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs

Horsepower : 230 hp @ 5300 rpm
Torque : 250 lb-ft @ 2200 rpm
Redline : 6750 rpm

Top speed : 153 mph
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 102.0 mph
60-0 braking distance : 120 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g

Curb Weight : 2970 lbs
Overall length : 175.7 in.
Wheelbase : 105.0 in.
Overall Width : 67.4 in.
Height : 56.5 in.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:10 PM
GForce957's Avatar
GForce957 GForce957 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

where do u get those stats
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:18 PM
youngvr4's Avatar
youngvr4 youngvr4 is offline
STREET RACING GURU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

various places, here's one

http://www.modernracer.com/index.html
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:25 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngvr4
srt-4 can hit 13's and also 99- 04 stang gt's
but were talkin 13.9-8 13.7 is unlikely

Gt's stats
Engine : V8, SOHC, front engine RWD
Displacement : 4,605 cc
Valve : 16 valves, 2 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 5-spd manual, 4-spd automatic
Fuel economy : city - 18 mpg
highway - 24-26 mpg

Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Live axle
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs

Horsepower : 260 hp @ 5250 rpm
Torque : 302 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Redline : unknown

Top speed : 140 mph(estimated)
0-60 mph : 6.1 sec.
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 98.0 mph
60-0 braking distance : 135 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.84 g

Curb Weight : 3273-3317 lbs(coupe), 3429-3477 lbs(convertible)
Overall length : 183.5 in.
Wheelbase : 101.3 in.
Overall Width : 73.1 in.
Height : 53.1 in.(coupe), 53.5 in.(convertible)

Srt-4 stats

2003-2005 Dodge Neon SRT-4


Created by Dodge's PVO team, the SRT-4 powered by a 2.4L turbo engine. The engine, underrated at 215 hp in 2003, is now rated at 230 hp and comes standard with an LSD for 2004. Numerous Mopar upgrades are also available.

Base price : $18,970 Get a free price quote

Engine : 4 cylinder, turbocharged, DOHC, front engine FWD
Displacement : 2,429 cc
Valve : 16 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 5-spd manual
Fuel economy : city - 22 mpg
highway - 30 mpg

Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent multilink
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs

Horsepower : 230 hp @ 5300 rpm
Torque : 250 lb-ft @ 2200 rpm
Redline : 6750 rpm

Top speed : 153 mph
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 102.0 mph
60-0 braking distance : 120 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g

Curb Weight : 2970 lbs
Overall length : 175.7 in.
Wheelbase : 105.0 in.
Overall Width : 67.4 in.
Height : 56.5 in.

here what autotrader says about srt-4s stats.

Horsepower 225 hp @ 5100 rpm

Torque 240 ft-lbs @ 2400 rpm
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-02-2006, 10:27 PM
GForce957's Avatar
GForce957 GForce957 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

sweet, thanks. Usually i cant find most stats on one page, so i have to go to like 4
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-02-2006, 11:10 PM
Elk's Avatar
Elk Elk is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by endlessheart666
Edit> I just found some more stuff about his car, it had a larger MAF, full exhaust rather than catback, 3.96 rear end...??(something like that). I'm not sure if any of that means anything but whatever...
Well I don't know enough about the Mustang to know if the larger MAF does much, but the gears should make the car a lot faster form a stop.
__________________
Buick Park Avenue, 1997
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts