|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
[quote=GForce957]99-04 gt is a low 14 second for the most part, ive never seen 13's out of them, but its possible i guess
04 str-4 225 hp. 2900 lbs. front wheel drive. LT1 trans am/ formula 285 hp. 3311 lbs. rear wheel drive so u mean srt-4 is faster ? l thought LT1s were way faster... l am really confused now man!!! |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
i believe the 225 is underrated.
You have an automatic with 2.73 gears correct? thats gonna slow u down I would say they are very close, ive never seen a race between either so i dunno for sure, but i think the srt is faster |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
Quote:
__________________
Buick Park Avenue, 1997 |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
A 96 GT with flowmasters and K&N is a 14.9 car on a good day. Nice kill nonetheless.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4 -K&N FIPK -Proboost mbc -Cusco front + rear strut bars -Greddy type-s -ATR downpipe -no cats -15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly. Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
Quote:
well yeah l got auto 2.73 gear. but l didnt say that for myself. l said it for every LT1 trans ams. manual tranny. and l still dont believe that srt-4s are faster than lt1s man. mine has 128k miles on it and l dont think l have 285 hp. anymore and l am not using it for racing but it is still fast anyway.. so l am not saying that l can beat them. but l beated a 99-04 stang GT. with this high mileage auto car. maybe he wasnt a good driver but l got him. l will post a new thread and ask this on firebird forum and l will see what they think about this and l let u know guys. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
yeah, i dont really know so im just going by a guess.
Also, didnt the manuals come with 3.42 gears? |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
Quote:
Edit> I just found some more stuff about his car, it had a larger MAF, full exhaust rather than catback, 3.96 rear end...??(something like that). I'm not sure if any of that means anything but whatever...
__________________
![]() 05 Srt4 Agp 3147 w/supporting mods ![]() 97 Mx-5 T28, hks man, ebay int/pipes, rfl bov, xtd 6 puck, 3" magnaflow, msd timing box, |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
Im enlesshearts friend, who was in the car with him during the time. He was only boosting about 14 psi. (vs. 17 for stock) The mustang was killing him off the line and through the first two gears but in third imidiatly passed him back up and would have put bus lengths on him if we had the room. Guy in the mustangs cool though.
__________________
1987 MAzda RX-7 TII built motor, every bolt on, big turbo, standalone, everything, exc.exc.exc. Easily 400+ 1955 Dodge Royal Lancer Super Red Top HEMI |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
man,
l just asked there and one guy answered (he knows better than many people) he said if they are both bone stock it would be drivers race.. now l am convinced. they re fast too.. and l really dont know about how manuals came. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
srt-4 can hit 13's and also 99- 04 stang gt's
but were talkin 13.9-8 13.7 is unlikely Gt's stats Engine : V8, SOHC, front engine RWD Displacement : 4,605 cc Valve : 16 valves, 2 valves per cylinder Transmission : 5-spd manual, 4-spd automatic Fuel economy : city - 18 mpg highway - 24-26 mpg Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut R - Live axle Brakes : F - Vented discs R - Solid discs Horsepower : 260 hp @ 5250 rpm Torque : 302 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm Redline : unknown Top speed : 140 mph(estimated) 0-60 mph : 6.1 sec. 0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 98.0 mph 60-0 braking distance : 135 ft 200 ft skidpad : 0.84 g Curb Weight : 3273-3317 lbs(coupe), 3429-3477 lbs(convertible) Overall length : 183.5 in. Wheelbase : 101.3 in. Overall Width : 73.1 in. Height : 53.1 in.(coupe), 53.5 in.(convertible) Srt-4 stats 2003-2005 Dodge Neon SRT-4 Created by Dodge's PVO team, the SRT-4 powered by a 2.4L turbo engine. The engine, underrated at 215 hp in 2003, is now rated at 230 hp and comes standard with an LSD for 2004. Numerous Mopar upgrades are also available. Base price : $18,970 Get a free price quote Engine : 4 cylinder, turbocharged, DOHC, front engine FWD Displacement : 2,429 cc Valve : 16 valves, 4 valves per cylinder Transmission : 5-spd manual Fuel economy : city - 22 mpg highway - 30 mpg Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut R - Independent multilink Brakes : F - Vented discs R - Solid discs Horsepower : 230 hp @ 5300 rpm Torque : 250 lb-ft @ 2200 rpm Redline : 6750 rpm Top speed : 153 mph 0-60 mph : 5.6 sec. 0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 102.0 mph 60-0 braking distance : 120 ft 200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g Curb Weight : 2970 lbs Overall length : 175.7 in. Wheelbase : 105.0 in. Overall Width : 67.4 in. Height : 56.5 in.
__________________
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
where do u get those stats
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
__________________
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
Quote:
here what autotrader says about srt-4s stats. Horsepower 225 hp @ 5100 rpm Torque 240 ft-lbs @ 2400 rpm |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
sweet, thanks. Usually i cant find most stats on one page, so i have to go to like 4
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Srt4 vs. Stang GT
Quote:
__________________
Buick Park Avenue, 1997 |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|