|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
applebonker, cut it out, before you get banned. Stereotyping against Fords isn't against the rules, but calling someone a cum-guzzler is. As I've stated, I like the F-Body more than the Mustang, but honestly, I'll concede that the 5.0 is more reliable than the 3rd/4th gen. F-Body by a fair margin. And what are you talking about, the 5.0 is "ugly" and "nobody wants them"? I hate to break it to you, but when it was around, it outsold the F-Bodies quite handily. Actually...it outsold them even when it got the puny 4.6L SOHC motor, making only 215 hp in its early stages. Which just goes to show that there is more to a car than how much horsepower it makes. The 5.0 Mustang was, and still is, a very popular car, and the Mustang enthusiasts outnumber both me and you by quite a bit, so I'd shut my mouth with the blatant stereotyping before you get a lynch mob after you.
__________________
![]() My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. ![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
Quote:
Nice try you stupid fuck, but Ive seen more than a few 5.0 mustangs with over 250,000 miles (that's right two-hundred-fifty-thousand) on them and they drive them daily without any problems what so ever, and they still pull 13's easily at the track while only being very mildly modified. So i wouldn't mention reliability if i were you. And no there are not any sick kickass grand ams, they dont exist, actually, mildly kickass grand ams dont even exist. they all suck ass and they are so damn ugly and lame that only retards should be allowed to drive them, actually mostly retards do drive them (like in your case). i cant believe you cant see or understand how fucking retarded and shit-ugly they are. you must embarrass your self all the time. and who gives a shit about "riced out 5.sl0ws" you retard, every type of car has been riced out, not just mustangs And what the fuck are you talking about you fucking faggot, a piece of shit grand am is not a fast car are you a fucking 14 year old retard or something? A supercharged grand am beating a 5.0 mustang? what the fuck, there are 302 powered supercharged mustangs running 10's you fucking fagot haha, there's no fucking comparison you stupid motherfucker. Haha and now everyone knows you are a stupid faggot, you think a ws6 can run anything around an 03 cobra? cobra run high 12's stock, not high 13's like a ls1 you retard. with $300 a cobra can run 11's, can a ws6? fuck no Oh, and my dad made over 1.5 million last year alone, and i get whatever i want so in 10 years while your working at burger king driving your "fast" ws6, ill be driving a fucking NEW viper or corvette so i would shut the fuck up if i were you, before i buy your house and have it demolished you poor looser. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
flip888,
Calm the hell down, because you look just as ignorant as he does. There were some pretty cool Grand Ams in the early 70s, large two-door models that looked cool IMO. The LS1 is an awesome engine, one that was underrated from the factory, and responds as well as anything to mods. Stock LS1 F-bodies are also consistent low 13 second cars.
__________________
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
I don't know why the LS1 was even brought into this conversation to begin with, and the blatant anti ford comments are just retarded. What was the about a stock trans am running circles around the last cobra? Come on the LS1 is an awesome engine but that statement just isn't true. The 5.0 mustang is proven to be a reliable performer, sure some may prefer a camaro, but in the selected years the ford is faster and has a better aftermarket.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
0-60 and 1/4 mile times
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula 6.5 14.8 1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0 2003 Ford Mustang Cobra SVT 4.5 12.9 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 13.7 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 13.6 |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
Any more flaming and displays of ignorance will see this thread closed.
And I will gladly start banning re-offenders.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: '88-'90 Mustang 5.0 vs '90-'92 Firebird Formula
blakscorpion21 are you really that fucking stupid?
Have a 24hr break. Thread closed.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|