|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: sl horsepower?
Quote:
Compression ratio is caused by the piston too. If you are going to run 12:1 then you are going to need timing control because knock is going to be a helluva bitch. Youd end up having to run around 100 octane most likely too. That starts taking streetablilty and reliability right out the window.Sorry but no 3s made 222 crank horse power stock. It is massively overrated. The 3s is at best 210 crank horse power. The highest horsepower na ended up with 220(?) horse power to the wheels. That would be right around 270 crank horsepower. But the thing is that car had every possible thing thrown at it. It was in no way streetable (reliable) because of the race grind cams and everything else. For your list. Intake maybe 1 horsepower at most headers 10 hp test pipe 10hp catback 5 hp MSD ignition maybe as much as none to 5 hp. It will just make your spark more efficient. injectors no horsepower, only required if you are maxing your stockers to keep from frying something from going lean fuel pump same deal as above under drive pulley 10 hp high flow MAS, not needed, Plenty of TT's running insane times on same MAS. TB same deal. Wont net you anything Intake manifold. Stocker is proven to be very efficient. NA would suffer greatly without the VICS system. What you are not concisdering though is power gain is not exponential. That adds up to about 40 hp, but as you power goes up, horsepower gained from individual mods will go down. There are guys MUCH more modded than that only seeing 190 hp to the wheels. You really need to read up on the NA's and how its just not financially smart to dump a whole lot of money into them because you are not going to see big gains. These arent push rod motors, they are mid sized old technology V6's.
__________________
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
old tech v6's? their quad cam motors. their capable of pushing alot of hp. sure maybe you would have to increase the octane for more power, but easily putting 50 crank hp on top of stock is reasonable.
If your looking at over 300 then compression ratios would come into factor. its bored the same as a vr4 so it can handle power. a set of aggressive cams for high end power will eaaaasily give you 20 more hp to the crank. and an intake will do more than 1 hp. sure k&n says "we gaurentee 15hp" but if u think reasonably, itll probobly give you 10. it gave a new rx8 about 12hp to the wheels. its when u get real high up the chart wehre compression becomes a problem, not around 270
__________________
check out my car pic 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL custom catback exhaust w/ mandarel bends k&n intake 245 crank hp |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
I'm doubting a K&N gives 10hp, especially at the wheels. Sure it may have done it on a few cars, but realistically you are probably seeing more like 2-3hp, not 10.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4 -K&N FIPK -Proboost mbc -Cusco front + rear strut bars -Greddy type-s -ATR downpipe -no cats -15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly. Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: sl horsepower?
Quote:
Also just adding higher octane doesnt give you more power. The higher octane is needed with higher compression otherwise you will get knock. If you would try to add 100 octane to a stock NA it would actually kill power because the higher the octane the harder to burn.
__________________
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
something is wrong with that...timing is probably out of wack!!!!
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: sl horsepower?
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
well headers (long tube) would have to give at LEAST 15hp I dont believe only 10. I dont think they even tested them (dyno) yet so we cant say much about that. If they have I havent seen it anywhere.
__________________
![]() Bye V8... |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
I will hopefully be having my car dyno'd this coming weekend. A shop has a promo going on. I have my intake done as well as my exhaust. I will report my results.
TMD |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: sl horsepower?
Quote:
I'm curious if you guys are talking whp about the intake and exhaust mods or do you mean it adds to the crank? If something like headers can put +10whp I'd be interested to see how much they add to the crank. why don't you run a turbo or tt setup with low boost? With a good tune and low boost you'd be running pretty reliably (provided you got everything in correctly and didn't just bolt it all up and drive around) mm damn I miss these cars. My old NA was barely a threat compared to what I have now but it was damn sexy.
__________________
Once PearlGT, now RaidenKing. Sr20det - Greddy V-SPL front mount intercooler, MR DP, Walbro 255 Fuel pump, Type RFL BOV, Koyo Radiator, MR straight pipe/muffler. Greddy Profec II, D2 Coilovers. In the garage - MR Headers, outlet, z32 maf, z32 brakes, home made tails. Near Future - 5 lug conversion w/ z32 brakes installed and decent lsd.
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
if you look at k&n ads in sport compact mags, they have for example a rx8 .. and if u add a k&n cold air intake to a stock rx8 it will add 12 hp to the wheels. and they gaurentee that. and surprisingly it adds 30 rwhp on to a 03 cobra stock.
yeah it sounds sketchy but they gaurentee it to the wheels. and when were talkin about the most power to an sl motor were talkin about keepin it n/a
__________________
check out my car pic 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL custom catback exhaust w/ mandarel bends k&n intake 245 crank hp |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: sl horsepower?
RX8 most likely has a restrictive stock intake. The Cobra also has a restrictive intake and it is boosting so it will show a better gain over a naturally aspirated car. The stock 3s NA intake is actually pretty efficient. A full intake wont even show a 5 hp gain.
I dont understand why you cant accept the fact that you cant build big power easily with NA 3s's. I have shown many facts proving otherwise. It is also commonly agreed upon that the 222hp stock rating is overrated yet you still insist on basing gains on that number. I have been cars since I was little(will be 25 this month) and have been around these cars for 3 years and been on 3si for 2 years constantly. I have learned alot and try to spread my knowledge to help anyone interested. I wouldnt feed you BS. Do a few bolt ons, and take care of the car. You should have yourself a mid 14 second car that is reliable and looks great.
__________________
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sl horsepower?
well that sucks...big time...and yeah k&n add good hp to rear wheel drive vehicles than on any front drive that i've seen...not just magazine adds, but tv shows
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|