|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
Quote:
How do the low end torque of the two compare? |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some more engine specs
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
More Hp/Tq I think he might win, unless his car weighs a lot more than yours.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
umm the intrigue has more torque at a lower rpm, less displacement, more horsepower, more valves, more cams, less compression? lol wtf is chevy doing with their monte...
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
abhahaah oh god do i ever hate domestic v6s, stick to the V8s
Feel that SS POWWAAA peak torque at 4000 rpm I bet its got a 5500rpm redline useless! |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
the 3.5L DOHC was really expensive to make, thats why they discontinued it. It also made the cars torque steer pretty bad, something that most Olds owners complained about.
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
20/29 city/highway for the 2000 SS
22/28 city/highway for the 2000 max wow |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2000 Monte Carlo SS VS. 2000 Intrigue
The V6 pissing contest.
__________________
RX-7 TII |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
pissing contest? nissan makes a better 6 cylinder - period.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|