2 boxes...

[replicant_008]

A loop...

Assuming the events happen on a sequential basis - since the box would be transferred to another location and then effectively that location is within the original location then viewed in our perceptual paradigm of 3 dimensional space with time as a constant - then we would have a continuous loop. At least from our point of view - what this would look like is something I'm not immediately able to envisage - it would depend on the cycle time of the sequentiality.

Anything less than 60 Hz would seem to flicker.

As this is a hypothetical situation, I'm assuming that this 'process' of transfer would NOT involve energy loss so it would go on ad infintum. If some energy was consumed then the event could be interupted with the exhaustion of the energy source.

Okay that's enough thinking for one day.

[Pikachoo]

By definition of the problem box B must be smaller than box A, or else box A wouldn't fit inside of box A. so when you try to transport box B into itself... well it just won't fit. End loop return error.

[THE4TH]

Originally posted by Pikachoo
I think the box would implode upon itself and create a black hole. You see, box B is designed so that the contents of box A are transported into box B correct?? So if Box B is inside Box A then Box B is repeatedly stacked into itself(in the same gemetry), so the walls of box B get more and more dense as more Box B's are transported into it's own walls. Almost instantaneously the walls would become so dense that they would implode onthemselves thereby creating a black hole.....

or nothing would happen..

seems close to me..
although i agree it would continue to send itself into itself which would be in box a which would then again send itself to box b which is in box a and then send itself to itself over and over again for eternity.. but i see no density problems..
although i would really like to see a black hole.. lol