-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:06 AM
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
NISSANSPDR NISSANSPDR is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
Re: Re: Stock 93 Turbo MR2 vs. Stock 93 240sx

Quote:
Originally Posted by BP2K2Max
something's not right. you sure his car's turbo? stock v stock an mr2 turbo should spank a 240. 200 hp 200 tq in the MR vs 155 hp and 140 tq, plus the 240 is gonna lose more power through drivetrain loss.
240SX's have 160 lbs of TQ...not 140...the torque is what makes them liveable
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-09-2005, 01:17 PM
TRD2000's Avatar
TRD2000 TRD2000 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Stock 93 Turbo MR2 vs. Stock 93 240sx

i think if you learn how to launch the MR2 you'll be very surprised...
__________________
Who needs AWD? i feel inspired by the original 911 turbo, my car will have more rubber sqeezed in its ass than Annabelle Chong! and it will go down as one of the greatest rides in history!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-09-2005, 05:40 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
the low end tq means shit esp compared to a mr2 turbo, those things make 200 lb ft of tq at like 3000rpm. also they can take off like a bat from hell from a stop.

hondachili is one of my best friends. i raced his mr2 a few times and from a roll we are almost identical and i'm making almost 290 crank hp. so there is nooooo waaay in hell that your stock almost dead KA would even stand a chance against a mr2 turbo unless the engine on that mr2 is dying worse then yours and is already blown.

hondachilis mr2 has a exhuast, and a gutted intake. thats the only power mods he has and it raised his boost from the stock 10 psi to 13 psi without any boost controllers.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-10-2005, 02:34 AM
MR2Driver's Avatar
MR2Driver MR2Driver is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 664
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Stock 93 Turbo MR2 vs. Stock 93 240sx

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rydell
a mr2 only has 130 horsepower until that turbo kicks in...
Wow.... have you ever seen a dyno plot? My turbo kicks in at about 3krpm, which im never even at during a drag race, and more importantly at those RPM the MR2 isnt making anywhere close to its peak power. So how would you know what HP rating its at, at 3krpm?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:38 AM
MR2turbo93's Avatar
MR2turbo93 MR2turbo93 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 208
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Stock 93 Turbo MR2 vs. Stock 93 240sx

No they come with bypass valves which are 2000% thats right 2000% better than a blow off valve.

This is also the reason your friends car may not be as fast because the metered air is getting blown into the air not back into the engine which will mess up the ECU's settings.

I raced a 240 in my MR2 and by the time i got to third he was so far back i couldnt see him.

A N/A MR2 would be a close race as they can also launce high.

Also the stock MR2 hasa twin entry turbo wich allows for 200tq at 3300rpm that turbo in my car pulls quite hard in high RPM.

Your friend should have his car checked out the vacuum lines and replace the factory Bypass valve.

Also new plugs wires and rotor from toyota should be replaced.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-10-2005, 01:29 PM
TRD2000's Avatar
TRD2000 TRD2000 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Stock 93 Turbo MR2 vs. Stock 93 240sx

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lachean
Wow.... have you ever seen a dyno plot? My turbo kicks in at about 3krpm, which im never even at during a drag race, and more importantly at those RPM the MR2 isnt making anywhere close to its peak power. So how would you know what HP rating its at, at 3krpm?
guessin he figured it'd be like the N/A or something? besides the gen 2 engine produces its peak torque at 3200RPM which isn't particularly high so it's still got enough torque below there, and ditto, who drops below 3k in a race anyway?
__________________
Who needs AWD? i feel inspired by the original 911 turbo, my car will have more rubber sqeezed in its ass than Annabelle Chong! and it will go down as one of the greatest rides in history!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-10-2005, 02:05 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: Stock 93 Turbo MR2 vs. Stock 93 240sx

The 3S-GE/GTE has plenty of torque down low. One of reasons why I like Toyota so much is how hearty and solid all of their cars feel, and this is mainly because of their tough and torquey four- and six-cylinder engines.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts