|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: super and turbo charging
When ones uses turbochargers and superchargers on one engine, the turbochargers pressure feed the supercharger, not the other way around.
If you are using a blower then you can simply use a bypassvalve to "disconnect" the supercharger. With equal pressures on both sides of the blower the power consumption will almost be zero without the use of any complicated clutches. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: super and turbo charging
Yes you're only in need of a clutch system or fluid flywheel if you have a two stage supercharger whether you have a turbocharger or not.
The obvious benefit for a tubro-supercharger is that with just the supercharger you are throwing away free power! The turbocharger does not need any engine power to run it. It's turned by the exhaust gasses and can be manipulated in varying degree by the waste gate.
__________________
1973 Z-28 1965 Nova 1950 Packard 1996 El Dorado Touring Coupe There is no substitute for cubic inches |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like this one?
![]() ![]()
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: super and turbo charging
i bet that thing's hella heavy, but if you're developing 6000+hp and the turbos give you an extra 600 from the added efficiency, i don't think the added weight really matters. thanks for the pics though, that thing looks sweet
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: super and turbo charging
OMG that is a mean looking Biatch!!!!
__________________
-Cory 1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar Stock internals. Daily driven. 12.6@122mph 496whp/436wtq at 25psi |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|