|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
do you guys really think a 05 mustang gt could get as low as a 13 flat stock??????? if im correct they come with 300hp and a little more torque don't know all the specs for sure. that sounds too low for me. how much does it weigh??
__________________
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
Quote:
__________________
2000 Nissan Maxima SE, autotragic, sterling mist My Max: Getting smoked by boosted cars since 2004 2004 AF award winner: longest time period w/o posting an actual street racing story Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
It was an automatic that I encountered so 'he doesn't know how to drive' is out the window unless of course it was a 12 year old kid who stole his dads car..and I seriously doubt the 05 GTs running 13 flats stock. That's LS1 territory. And theres no way a mustang is going to beat an LS1...especially not stock.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
Quote:
The new 2005 Mustang GT's are said to run roughly mid 13's. With some dipping in the lower 13's. Either way, I am not scared of them.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
Quote:
The cars require two very different driving styles due to the mach-1's lack of torque relative to the GT. However, power and weight are very similar, with the GT having a slight power advantage and a very slight weight disadvantage. Mach-1's have run as fast as a 13.2 second e.t.'s in the hands of new-car magazines (it took them over a year to figure out how to drive it) and private owners have seen just north of 13 flat bone stock. The 05 GT has, thus far, run a best time of 13.5 in a new car rag and a best yet 13.35 in the hands of a private owner. Keep in mind that these cars have yet to be broken in, and people are still learning how to drive them as well. Also keep in mind that when the Mach-1's were "as new" as the 05 GT is to us now they were typically running much slower than that 13.2, and slower than GT's are right now. It took about a year for people to figure out how to drive the rev happy Mach, but they eventually ran within a whisker of 13 flat when broken in and driven well. It takes a while to figure out how a car wants to be driven, and breaking it in helps a bit too. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
The last statments about Mustang GT and Mach 1's are a hundred percent true. What do you if i might ask.
__________________
The force is strong with you. If you defeat me, I will remember your name. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
mr luous..one word...sarcasm
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
I see you're from PA. I was gonna say I talk to a female who owns a black Formula WS6, i think it's well into the 10's, with an S/C, Nitrous etc. Yea, I've seen some 05 Mustangs in my Thunderbird (Both V6's), but havent seen any in my Camaro, such a shame...
__________________
2002 F150 SuperCab FX4 6" Fabtech, 3" BL, Detroit locker, Edge tuned, Yukon 4.56s, 37" Nittos, Harley lights, Depo fogs, 8K HIDs, Powerstop brakes 1992 Lincoln Mark VII LSC 302 H.O, A9L ECU swap, 65mm TB, 73mm Granetelli MAF, FRPP 30lb injectors, Walbro 255, MSD ignition, Powerdyne BD11 supercharger, Efans, T-5 swap w/ FRPP flywheel, Ram HDX clutch and adjustable Steeda clutch quadrant, 4.10 gears, Nitto NT555R radials 2000 OBS Tahoe Z71 6k HIDs, 33" Goodyears. 280k mile daily beater |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: ws6 vs 05 stang
There is not a chance for a 2005 Mustang GT to win a race against any LS-1 WS6 in good running condition. Is't just not enough car. Ford and GM are all F%#$d up. New cars suck!!
GTO= Great power / to heavy and not enough looks! 05' GT= All looks / to heavy and not enough power!
__________________
The force is strong with you. If you defeat me, I will remember your name. |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|