i wanna go faster

[Crasen]

I didn't see anybody ask so I will, what year is it, and what engine does it have in it. I had a 95 with a 2.3, and yes it would break 90 but it would take a LONG time to get there.

[rum runner]

Originally Posted by SultanGris

yea, mustangs rule, camaros and trans am's are chick cars. they did kinda suck in the 80's, but so did everything, what can ya do.

Mustang is the new chic car now, especially the flop-tops. Camaros and Trans Am's are out of production......hot chics like new cars. I have no problem with that, 2005 Mustang is by far the best looking American sports car on the road for under $30,000. And I don't even like Fords.

[beat88ls]

i've had my 95 4.0L 4x4 5speed ranger over 119mph many times. i had to replace the computer with an aftermarket unit and now it dosent have a speed limiter

[t/a 6.6]

Originally Posted by rum runner

Mustang is the new chic car now, especially the flop-tops. Camaros and Trans Am's are out of production......hot chics like new cars. I have no problem with that, 2005 Mustang is by far the best looking American sports car on the road for under $30,000. And I don't even like Fords.

Hey respect the mustang it ain't a sports car it be a muscle car now and forever.

[t/a 6.6]

Originally Posted by rum runner

Why would you want to go over 90-100 mph in such a light pick-up truck? No weight in the rear, horrible aerodynamics. Remember trucks are geared for pulling a load, not top end.

If you want to run top end buy high-speed tires. Tires go egg shaped at high speeds.

Umm..... not really the ford ranger has a real high rear end I know my 86 has a 370 in it so its really geared to move (even though it can't) as the ranger was orgianly designed for off road racing.