|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: accord or camry
Quote:
It is true that the two transmissions i have bought were used and i have only broken 2 total i am on my third. I have nothing to say that the second one wasn't on it's "last leg" when i got it except that it came out a car with less than 100K miles on it. I'm sure there are people out there that have not had transmission problems as well as many people who have...it is my understanding that the 94 accords had particularly bad transmissions and the problem was somewhat fixed in 95 so maybe it's just me.
__________________
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: accord or camry
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: accord or camry
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: accord or camry
I noted your comment earlier that you don't brutalize the transmissions yourself.
But my point was that you're giving the impression that Honda built 2 bad transmissions, but without the data to back it up. Actually, have you owned the car from new? If not, then BOTH your failed transmissions could have resulted from someone else's bad driving/maintenance. Counter to that was my experience - 3 Accords, all used (and with only limited knowledge of the history of one of them) and no transmission failures in 100's of thousands of miles. Some years ago, I owned 2 GM full-size sedans, and the transmissions on both went out well before 100,000 miles! |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|