Impreza WRX vs Lancer EVO?

[lancerz]

You must be in America or a country that doesnt see A EVO hit the roads. Thus you get pissy WRX's thats why you love them so much hey?

If you seriously think a WRX is better then an EVO, you must be smoking buds.



WRX -
EVO - :sun:

[JD@af]

Well, the WRX is now here, and the EVO is slated for US distribution in the fall of 2002, so we'll know first-hand in about a year and a half!!

[primera man]

WRX for me..

[ales]

I'd have to choose the Lancer EVO VI. It's just more radical. And I sooo bored with the Subarus. I've seen like 1 EVO here, and Imprezzas are all over the place.

CU. NISMO 4ever

[DVSNCYNIKL]

I'll go with the EVO! I like the looks. And the horsepower's not too shabby.

[Racer 20]

I'll say EVO. But this is based on looks. I think both cars are so similiar it's scary.

[Chris]

In the wet, a WRX in rally trim is faster in the 0-60 than a Porsche 911 Turbo in the DRY!! In the mud, it does 0-60 in the 4 second range. Amazing.

In the real world, I'd have to take the Evo VI, because of its titanium-alumium (I think) turbine, which makes tons of boost quikly (less weight). It's gee-gaw of electronic differentials, etc. But I don't know too much about the 22B STi.
Wait a minute, I have an article on it. Ill come up with my real decision later.

[primera man]

I'd have to go with the WRX, but only the 2 door model. I just think they are a lot better looking then the 4 door model.
The Evo i like just as much, but i just like the fact of having a 2 door "horse power on 4 wheels" car.

[Porsche]

This thread is kinda old but, The WRX is available now, if you could get one and the EVO Vll concept was just released a little while ago.

[Chris]

I like the affordability and the fact that I can carry real people in them. And its a sleeper. Example:
"Ahhh, the little lancer(or Impreza) wantst ot play. I'm going to have to spank it realllll good. hehehe. (2 seconds later) HOLY SHIT!! WHAT THE HELL IS THAT???? (very embarrassed)"
Hehehe. muhahaha.

[enzo@af]

0-60 in 4 in the mud? What? No way. Where are you getting these facts? They seem a little absurd.

[Chris]

I also did a double take. I'll find the exact page and magazine date. I think it was car and driver.
I hope it is, cuz' I've got 90+magazines to sort through.

[lancerz]

Originally posted by Bean Bandit
I saw on TV that 62 years old guy EX-Rally driver. He took the WRX for a test drive in the snow it was astonishing and IMO the WRX is more a Rally(dirty track) car than the EVO. The EVO is very good street racer:bandit:

BTW ther are 6 EVOs

Do you even know what your on about? I dont think so.

The Evo VI is a rally car, and there is a Street Version.

And why didnt he test the Evo VI? looks like someone is a WRX biased person. (62 yr old! HAHA! - he should be sitting at home drinking tea and watching TV)

[flylwsi]

you cant lose with either car....
end of story


oh, enzo.. he was talking about a rally car that could do 0-60 in 4secs in the mud

rally cars have 300+ hp and sick awd... it could/does happen

[lancerz]

hmm ive just stumbled across this section to see my own posts which i did a while back and didnt even notice.

I said it last time, I'll say it again: EVO VI