|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this car worth it? 99 SS?
Come on, you can't base real life on a game!
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this car worth it? 99 SS?
Hey992 RS where is the pic of that camaro taken at? Which Track?
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
410s decrease top speed right? is there a way to increase top speed by putting higher rear gears in on a stock camaro or are the gears on the camaro the minimum? gran turismo has camaros? i thought it was rice cars?
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
rearend gearing does dramatic changes to your top speed. i used to have a 2.73 on my camaro (it's pictured w/ that rearend) now i have a 3.42 posi and it will accelerate off the line dramatically faster. the drawback tho, i took down my top speed from about 140, to about 100. my top speed is incredibly low right now. like i said, dramatic changes, if you want to increase top end then you give the rear a shallower gear, if you want better acceleration, deeper rear end helps alot.
__________________
'92 RS lt1/t56, lt4 hot cam, 30lb injectors, 54mm throttle body, full exhaust, 4.11 posi, 4 coil ignition, alluminum driveshaft, adj rear suspension, low. springs, electric water pump, custom tune. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
then how do drag cars go over 200mph with 410s? high rpms? the way i see it w/ 410s if its in a 1:1 gear the engine would have to spin 4 times faster than the wheels. wouldnt the car be faster with higher gears if it has enough torque to compensate for the loss in acceleration?
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this car worth it? 99 SS?
I guess if that same car had 2.73s it would have over 25% less acceleration while the top speed would increase by the same factor.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|