|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Celica GT or base RSX? | |||
| Celica GT |
|
5 | 45.45% |
| RSX (not Type-S) |
|
6 | 54.55% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Click my Toyota icon and check every stat page for the Celica GT-S. You won't find anything about it there. They would have put that in the Comparisons part of their site against the RSX, but there's nothing. But just to be sure, I am going to take a trip to the dealership soon to try it in a GT-S.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have you calculated the hp/lbs and torque/lbs for both fully loaded base RSX and Celica GT? That should help give you a much better idea who is on top. Celica have virtually no rear space. Reminds me of my experience sitting in the rear seats of a Supra. At least a 6 feet person can get by sitting in the rear of RSX.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know about you, but I never let people sit in my 2+2 anytime anyways. I doubt larger rear seats make a huge selling point for enthusiasts willing to modify their cars, in any case.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know, I just thought of this and had to add this. Concerning the upscale models of these cars, no RSX lovers are willing to point out that the jump in power from the GSR came almost directly from the upped displacement to 2.0 liters. I know many Honda owners love to brag that their 1.6 or 1.8 can easily take on the beastier domestics with types of technology like VTEC, but it seems like they are keeping quiet about the growth in engine size for both Civics and Integra/RSXs.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|