-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 03-12-2004, 05:09 PM
camaroincal camaroincal is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to camaroincal
Re: Re: Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtdg19
Have you ever driven an f-body? How about one with a beefier suspension package? You'd be suprised. Half of the gossip (and it is more than likely gossip) you hear is probably sombody talking out of their 'you know what' who has in fact never driven an f-body to begin with.
Lol Kurt dog you're wasting your breath. You should see how many times I've tried to stand up for the F-Body and got shot down on this forum.

But thanks for the backup!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-12-2004, 07:21 PM
StupidBrodie StupidBrodie is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
These cars arent all THAT different...
sorry to break some hearts but they both handle about the same (they both pull about .88 in handling Gs around a 67-69mph through the slalom)
power wise the SS is for the most part (dont care about your brother's friend's uncle who did a 12.8 in one) is a low to mid 13 and the Z is a high 13 in the 1/4mile...
its pretty much all about preference on this one.. the SS obviously has more power potential but then again EVERYONE has a fast SS... A TT 300zx done right is no slouch and may turn a few more heads but you'll spend your life savings fixing it up (aftermarket for a TT 300zx?? whats that?)... and if it breaks... i pity you
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-12-2004, 11:34 PM
youngvr4's Avatar
youngvr4 youngvr4 is offline
STREET RACING GURU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i agree
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-13-2004, 09:13 AM
Zwrangler's Avatar
Zwrangler Zwrangler is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 684
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
(aftermarket for a TT 300zx?? whats that?)... and if it breaks... i pity you
Yup, gotta agree with this.

I've always liked the sound of the Wooosh a blow-off valve makes in a turbo but then again I love the grunt and howl of a big V8 when its going all out. Any car, v8 or turbo can be tuned to make huge performance with enough $$$$$. Oh and there isn't much difference between a normal z28 camaro and an SS anyway, just 20-30 hp difference. Basically only a better exhaust, yet everyone here is making out like "oh if its an SS then i'd definitely go for the camao but otherwise get the 300zx".

It all depends on what look you want. I personally love the muscle car look of camaro's coz they look so damn agressive and seeing one in your rear view mirror is enough to scare the average driver Not to mention the roar of the monstrous v8 as it overtakes you. All Personal taste really.
__________________

93 camaro Z28 R.I.P.
From this......................to this and this

check it out at my website

"Pain heals, chicks dig scars but glory is forever !"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-13-2004, 05:01 PM
youngvr4's Avatar
youngvr4 youngvr4 is offline
STREET RACING GURU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
but you make it seem as if 30hp is nothing and exhaust isn't gonna give you 30hp
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-17-2004, 10:32 PM
freakonaleash1187's Avatar
freakonaleash1187 freakonaleash1187 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to freakonaleash1187 Send a message via MSN to freakonaleash1187
Re: Re: Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtdg19
Have you ever driven an f-body? How about one with a beefier suspension package? You'd be suprised. Half of the gossip (and it is more than likely gossip) you hear is probably sombody talking out of their 'you know what' who has in fact never driven an f-body to begin with.
thats another thing people keep on saying. put a suspension kit on f-body and see which one handles better. duh its gonna handle better if it has a better suspension.
__________________


ZedEx Crew Member #2
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-18-2004, 12:00 AM
youngvr4's Avatar
youngvr4 youngvr4 is offline
STREET RACING GURU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
a 300zx pulls a 89 on the skidpad, the camaro pulls a 88. meaning camaro is so close its more like a drivers race on a track. saying that, the camaro ss is faster so it would pull after the corners.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-18-2004, 12:23 AM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

I'm biased but I say Camaro all the way if you want a fun muscle car that handle's good and has a huge aftermarket but I must admit I do think that the 300ZX TT is a cool looking car but the Camaro's are just more fun. IMO
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-18-2004, 03:52 AM
Zwrangler's Avatar
Zwrangler Zwrangler is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 684
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One big factor I don't think anybody's mentioned yet is... does the 300zx burn as much fuel as the camaro ?? I gotta tell ya, camaro's are absolute petrol guzzlers. And yes everyone will say it depends on how hard you drive it, but if you have a car like a caaro or a 300zx you'll be tempted to drive it hard most of the time anyway

If you're completely equal in both cars in terms of looks and performance, then i'd say the next comparison should be gas mileage and the price you'd pay for parts for both of these cars. Which ever has the lowest cost should be your choice.
__________________

93 camaro Z28 R.I.P.
From this......................to this and this

check it out at my website

"Pain heals, chicks dig scars but glory is forever !"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-18-2004, 11:07 PM
StupidBrodie StupidBrodie is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

gas mileage wise a 300zx is going to get about 17-18mpg in town and around 23-24 on the freeway... the SS gets about 18-19mpg in town and about 26-27 on the freeway
parts wise its pretty obvious the SS is going to be way cheaper to mod
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-18-2004, 11:52 PM
Kurtdg19's Avatar
Kurtdg19 Kurtdg19 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Kurtdg19
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

Quote:
Originally Posted by freakonaleash1187
thats another thing people keep on saying. put a suspension kit on f-body and see which one handles better. duh its gonna handle better if it has a better suspension.
I was refering the suspension packages as different trim options available on the F-bodys. You can get the available WS6 suspension upgrade for the T/A's as you could get a track ready 350Z from Nissan. I'm not sure why you interpreted it as you did, but its a bit off.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-20-2004, 06:42 PM
Joseph1082 Joseph1082 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

I'd just need to point out that i think the original question was refering to the low models of these cars, but I'm not sure. These cars aren't really different, pretty much the same. My LS1 weights 3402lb. not that damn heavy, and handles damn well. A v8 chugs down gas, so will a v6 TT. The people that are comparing TT's or v8 to the other's base model, well, we all know the outcome of that comparison. Ok, base model vs. bm... the 300zx is faster, hands down. Top level, v8 LS1 vs v6 TT, the LS1 is faster... and both cars handle about the same, and I'd say here in LI NY I see both about the same amount, so this is a subjective decision, wait, actually, the only pro I see is a cheaper aftermarket for the camaro.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-20-2004, 07:34 PM
camaroincal camaroincal is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to camaroincal
What do 5 speed 1990-96 300zx's run in the 1/4 mile? A 3.8 liter 5 speed 1995-02 Camaro will run a low 15 in the 1/4 mile. These car's weigh nearly the same with the zx having the advantage of a higher redline and 22 hp but the Camaro has a 27 lb ft of tq. advantage for off the line power. What is the zx's top speed? Also the zx's get worse gas mileage getting 18 city and 24 highway whereas the Camaro gets 19 city and 30 highway.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-20-2004, 07:45 PM
drewh4386's Avatar
drewh4386 drewh4386 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to drewh4386 Send a message via MSN to drewh4386 Send a message via Yahoo to drewh4386
Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

It depends on where you stay. A 300zx is a hell of a lot cooler than an SS. Especially a tt model with 3in. dual exhuast
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-20-2004, 09:10 PM
freakonaleash1187's Avatar
freakonaleash1187 freakonaleash1187 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to freakonaleash1187 Send a message via MSN to freakonaleash1187
Re: 2000 Camaro vs. 1990-1996 300ZX

i have seen a 15.1 second 1/4 mile for a n/a 300zx. and if i remember right the top speed is in the 150's-160's. so they are a pretty close match. it comes down to what style and brand do you like more. im sorry kurtdg that i didnt know there was a suspension package with the ws6, i thought you were talking about an aftermarket suspension package.
__________________


ZedEx Crew Member #2
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts