|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#16
01-09-2004, 02:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
what kind of gas mileage could i expect (estimated) with a 351w with say 3.55 gears compared to a 5.0 with same gears with basic mods, no supercharge or turbo or nitrous. thx guys!!
|
|
#17
01-11-2004, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
probably something around 20, but not much more.
|
|
#18
01-12-2004, 02:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
the 5.0???
|
|
#19
01-13-2004, 12:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Niether. The 5.0 should average 20+mpg while the 351W will get more around the high teens to low twenties. This is assuming everything is relatively stock as the 3.55 gears will take a bite out of mileage. I've heard of people getting as high as 28mpg on long road trips with a stock 5.0 LX and as low as 8mpg. It will vary alot depending on the vehicle condition and where and how you drive it. My '89 GT 5-speed has done as well as 24mpg@70mph.
__________________
1968 Mustang notchback Roller 302, Edelbrocks, Hookers, side-exits, RRs, Crane 2031, Duraspark, forged slugs, X-Celerator, 650DP, Fidanza FW, RAM clutch, Toploader, Comp Plus, McLeod bell, 15x7s, 1 1/8 swaybar. 1972 Ford Pinto SVO 2.3 turbo, MegaSquirt, T5, 8", etc. '95 Honda XR600-10.5:1, 628cc, ported head, & more.
|
|
#20
01-14-2004, 10:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
what about a relatively stock 5.0 with 3.73 gears?
|
|
#21
01-15-2004, 12:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Probably high teens to very low 20s depending on how its driven.
__________________
1968 Mustang notchback Roller 302, Edelbrocks, Hookers, side-exits, RRs, Crane 2031, Duraspark, forged slugs, X-Celerator, 650DP, Fidanza FW, RAM clutch, Toploader, Comp Plus, McLeod bell, 15x7s, 1 1/8 swaybar. 1972 Ford Pinto SVO 2.3 turbo, MegaSquirt, T5, 8", etc. '95 Honda XR600-10.5:1, 628cc, ported head, & more.
|
|
#22
01-15-2004, 01:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
thx!!!!
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
