|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just came across this thread, sorry I'm late.
![]() The SRT-4 Engine is not build by Hyundai for Mitsu as far as I know... It's built in the good old US of A: http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/ And also from this article: http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/ro...dge/index.html The engine, by the way, is new and based on the 2.4-liter turbo the company has been selling in the Mexican market. However, in the SRT-4 it's radically updated. Still displacing 2.4 liters, it gets new pistons, which are now cooled by oil squirters. Stronger rods and a new cast crank both support the 14 psi shoved down its intake manifold by the Mitsubishi TD04-16G turbocharger. Before reaching the intake manifold, charge air is cooled by a huge front-mounted cross-flow intercooler, which does wonders for the looks of the car. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 350z vs evo8 vs srt4
Quote:
yea this is an old thread, i have read something like that before and since i cant find it i've been thinking i havnt read that like i thought, i could very well be wrong
__________________
Winning is winning doesnt matter if its an inch or a mile. there is so much more to racing then a strait line. Nascar sucks!!! |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: 350z vs evo8 vs srt4
Gotta keep the thread alive! J/K Seriously, even though the thread is old, I'd thought I'd add. Its a good topic for discussion anyhow.
Quote:
I thought about the SRT4 but I wanted to get away from FWD. Besides, as cool as the car is, it still looks like a Neon. It may not be called a Neon, but I'm not fond of its curves either way. I will say this though, BEST bang for the buck, hands down. I contacted the Mitsu dealer, but never bothered to even test drive the EVO. I already knew its strong points: its the fastest of the three, very easy to mod, and very well suited to daily driving. I really didn't have to worry about daily driving, since I still had the Civic. I also owned a GSX before and I was wary about Mitsus and AWD. Its great for the quarter mile, but after that drivetrain loss is a bitch. Naturally, I chose the Z. Its the best looking, IMO, and may not be the fastest, but thats what modding is all about. If you can afford to, that is. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 350z vs evo8 vs srt4
well i came across this and thought hey y not....um id deff go for the z, if ur into modds and performance than the z is best of all(assuming u have $$$). the new greddy tt kit for the z is insane, it really saved off a good amount of time. i deff wanna get a z and put the kit on and try it out, or at least test drive the one greddy made if i can find a place thatll let me.im pretty curiouse though about wat rpm the 18g turbos would spool at for the z....cause i was thinkin i might be able to lower the 0-60 and 1/4 time by using 25g turbos instead of the 18g's but i dunno if it would spool fast enough to help, it might hurt the 0-60 instead? i dunno thats y i wanna find out, it would really make the car fly if the 25g's would spool around 3.5k rpm on the z......can u say unbeatable lol
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 350z vs evo8 vs srt4
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 350z vs evo8 vs srt4
Quote:
Keep the rubber side down and the shiny side up.... |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: 350z vs evo8 vs srt4
Quote:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|