|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
why is it everybody hates on Stangs???
we dont get em here in the UK unless u import em, but i think they r sweet, especially the old 60-70's one wot is wrong with them ???
__________________
Jim - Your Resident EDM Biatch B16A1 I/H/E 4TH GEN UK SITE Honda Civic EE9 1.6-i VT |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
those are the ppl that think they are 2 good for everyone else |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
He was deffinetly trying, he's the one that jumped first. And I could hear his engine reving like super freaking high. And it was def a GT. I can tell the diff. in sound. I don't know thugh. GT's only have like 170 whp, and they are heavy. So if they half way suck at driving it's very possible. Plus we raced like a less than 1/8 mile. So...he would have probably got me if we were going further. Don't pop my bubble though!
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
e) He probably wasn't racing. GTs give my car a good run with a B16.. I've never seen one run as slow as a basically stock 4th gen Si.
__________________
"The nympho of info, I'm fuckin' what ya heard"
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Your numbers are way off. If it were a GT, AND he was really running you he'd have left you going 20 by the time he was doing 50. I traded my 2001 GT for my 2003 Cobra. If you really beat him here's what happened: 1. He was laughing too hard to press the gas pedal 2. It was a V6 and he was still laughing to hard to press the gas pedal 3. He just hit it for a second to see if you'd actually try to run him No offense, but there is no way.
__________________
--Sly A "slap in the face" since 1975 |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dude I saw a GT stock dyno at 170 whp I think I would know. And a V6 has no chance. I have raced so many V6 Mutangs ist's not even funny. The road in front of us kinda winds ~ so I'm thinking he sucked at driving and stangs don't handle as well as civics. I drove my friends and it sucked.
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah you're right what do I know.... I only owned one and own a Cobra now.
Let's look at this statement: Quote:
A. 94 and 95 were 5.0L engines rated at 205 hp B. 96 and up are the 4.6L SOHC C. 96 - 98 were rated at 215 hp D. The body style change was in 99 from the curved to the more angular look of the present car E. The 99 up GT engine is rated at 260 HP F. The series would be: 94 - 95, 96 - 98, 99 - present You don't even know what you "raced". Let me say it again: There is no way you beat ANY GT listed above that wanted to actually race unless it was missing on 3 cylinders. You're the type of guy that gives import owners a bad name for making up stories. Why don't you tell us another one. Tell me how with a turbo kit you'll spank my Cobra next. My DX Hatch is a fun little project car, but it won't be "smoking" any GTs anytime soon. Even with a motor swap I don't see it happening. At least most of the others in this thread know what reality is.
__________________
--Sly A "slap in the face" since 1975 |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Got news for ya budy, I got three people that saw me beat him. I just said I beat him also. I never said I over powered him. I also said my guess was he sucked at driving it. I know a GT would beat a Civic Si with barely anything done to it. The point was I beat it. It doesn't matter how I did it or why but I did. If he sucks that bad he doesn't need a muscle car. And no I'm not up to date on my Fords cause personally I think Fords aren't worth crap. If you want a real muscle car go for a Chevy.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
hey Slythetove have u top speed the mustang yet? what is the top speed of ur cobra
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
prob a v6
__________________
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!:thumbup: Please tell me you're kidding??? I dunno on what planet this is true. There are few things Mustangs are good at...1) Very shitty fuel economy and 2) Going fast in a straight line. Turning is definitely not a Mustang strong point, hence the shitty suspension design, and way too heavy. Argue all you want, but how many of you have seen Mustang on a AutoX course?
__________________
There's nary an animal alive that can outrun a greased Scotsman! |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thats another reason I think I beat him, the road was curvy and I think he sucked at driving, plu sit was even heaver due to the hydralic lift for the conv. top.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno who is the BS artist here, and really dont care.
I've beaten many cars I shouldnt have, Mustangs included. That doesnt mean it didnt happen. I think the driver makes all the difference in the world. A win is a win, doesnt matter if its against a shithead, or pro racer. Also, wouldnt it make a difference if the Stang was Auto? Just asking... And I have raced many many v6's.....They're slow as dogshit. I wouldnt doubt a mildly modded Si could take one out. I used to love racing the v-6 mustangs, because I'd walk on them all day with the Zc. Top end too...Kinda funny leaving a Mustang at 135mph. Word to the wise, keep your Kill stories to yourself. How would you ever hope to prove something of this nature? That is of course, unless you have video.
__________________
There's nary an animal alive that can outrun a greased Scotsman! |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|