-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee
Register FAQ Community
'88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com
Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 05-23-2003, 03:30 AM
Civic Jim's Avatar
Civic Jim Civic Jim is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Civic Jim Send a message via MSN to Civic Jim
why is it everybody hates on Stangs???

we dont get em here in the UK unless u import em, but i think they r sweet, especially the old 60-70's one

wot is wrong with them ???
__________________
Jim - Your Resident EDM Biatch
B16A1 I/H/E
4TH GEN UK SITE
Honda Civic EE9 1.6-i VT
  #17  
Old 05-23-2003, 07:47 AM
quiXilver's Avatar
quiXilver quiXilver is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to quiXilver Send a message via AIM to quiXilver Send a message via Yahoo to quiXilver
Quote:
Originally posted by mellowboy
Those things run mid 14s stock.
This is true, they are mid 14 sec cars stock, I've had ppl give up after first gear, there just like "hah!" he knew he could smoke you so he didn't want to embarass you infront of himself lol

those are the ppl that think they are 2 good for everyone else
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/quixilver09
B18A
-It's always somethin'
  #18  
Old 05-23-2003, 07:58 AM
doug294 doug294 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doug294
He was deffinetly trying, he's the one that jumped first. And I could hear his engine reving like super freaking high. And it was def a GT. I can tell the diff. in sound. I don't know thugh. GT's only have like 170 whp, and they are heavy. So if they half way suck at driving it's very possible. Plus we raced like a less than 1/8 mile. So...he would have probably got me if we were going further. Don't pop my bubble though!
  #19  
Old 05-23-2003, 10:30 AM
SiZ's Avatar
SiZ SiZ is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,824
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by cyberfelon
i dunno ive beat quite a few of those newer gt's in my completely stock si, so either
a) either they all sucked
b) im really awesome
c) mustangs suck hard core
d)all of the above
you decide
I'll pick:
e) He probably wasn't racing.


GTs give my car a good run with a B16.. I've never seen one run as slow as a basically stock 4th gen Si.

__________________
"The nympho of info, I'm fuckin' what ya heard"
  #20  
Old 05-23-2003, 10:38 AM
Slythetove Slythetove is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by doug294
He was deffinetly trying, he's the one that jumped first. And I could hear his engine reving like super freaking high. And it was def a GT. I can tell the diff. in sound. I don't know thugh. GT's only have like 170 whp, and they are heavy. So if they half way suck at driving it's very possible. Plus we raced like a less than 1/8 mile. So...he would have probably got me if we were going further. Don't pop my bubble though!
Hate to tell you this, but there is no way your car will outrun a GT. Also a 99 up GT (the angular body style) is rated at 260 bhp. Even with a 15% loss through the drivetrain that 221 Rear Wheel Hp.

Your numbers are way off. If it were a GT, AND he was really running you he'd have left you going 20 by the time he was doing 50. I traded my 2001 GT for my 2003 Cobra.

If you really beat him here's what happened:

1. He was laughing too hard to press the gas pedal
2. It was a V6 and he was still laughing to hard to press the gas pedal
3. He just hit it for a second to see if you'd actually try to run him

No offense, but there is no way.
__________________
--Sly
A "slap in the face" since 1975
  #21  
Old 05-23-2003, 10:52 AM
doug294 doug294 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doug294
Dude I saw a GT stock dyno at 170 whp I think I would know. And a V6 has no chance. I have raced so many V6 Mutangs ist's not even funny. The road in front of us kinda winds ~ so I'm thinking he sucked at driving and stangs don't handle as well as civics. I drove my friends and it sucked.
  #22  
Old 05-23-2003, 11:13 AM
walt0023 walt0023 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to walt0023 Send a message via Yahoo to walt0023
Quote:
Originally posted by doug294
Dude I saw a GT stock dyno at 170 whp I think I would know. And a V6 has no chance. I have raced so many V6 Mutangs ist's not even funny. The road in front of us kinda winds ~ so I'm thinking he sucked at driving and stangs don't handle as well as civics. I drove my friends and it sucked.
not dissing on our civics or anything but i think mustangs have a much better setup handling wise. i have a 89 gt with cai, exhaust, gears short shifter, blah blah blah. when i let my dad drive the mustang he always beats me by a car length. i have a b16 in my car so there is no way you could even come close to beating him. and i have raced 95 gt's before with my old si motor and they always beat me. sorry but there was no way this guy was racing you. he was prob fu*king with you.
__________________

  #23  
Old 05-23-2003, 11:26 AM
Slythetove Slythetove is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah you're right what do I know.... I only owned one and own a Cobra now.

Let's look at this statement:

Quote:
Originally posted by doug294
I'm pretty sure it was the 95-99 model.

A. 94 and 95 were 5.0L engines rated at 205 hp
B. 96 and up are the 4.6L SOHC
C. 96 - 98 were rated at 215 hp
D. The body style change was in 99 from the curved to the more angular look of the present car
E. The 99 up GT engine is rated at 260 HP
F. The series would be: 94 - 95, 96 - 98, 99 - present

You don't even know what you "raced".

Let me say it again:

There is no way you beat ANY GT listed above that wanted to actually race unless it was missing on 3 cylinders.

You're the type of guy that gives import owners a bad name for making up stories.

Why don't you tell us another one. Tell me how with a turbo kit you'll spank my Cobra next.

My DX Hatch is a fun little project car, but it won't be "smoking" any GTs anytime soon. Even with a motor swap I don't see it happening.

At least most of the others in this thread know what reality is.
__________________
--Sly
A "slap in the face" since 1975
  #24  
Old 05-23-2003, 01:55 PM
doug294 doug294 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doug294
Got news for ya budy, I got three people that saw me beat him. I just said I beat him also. I never said I over powered him. I also said my guess was he sucked at driving it. I know a GT would beat a Civic Si with barely anything done to it. The point was I beat it. It doesn't matter how I did it or why but I did. If he sucks that bad he doesn't need a muscle car. And no I'm not up to date on my Fords cause personally I think Fords aren't worth crap. If you want a real muscle car go for a Chevy.
  #25  
Old 05-23-2003, 01:57 PM
1.5 liter 1.5 liter is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 415
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to 1.5 liter
hey Slythetove have u top speed the mustang yet? what is the top speed of ur cobra
  #26  
Old 05-23-2003, 01:59 PM
walt0023 walt0023 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to walt0023 Send a message via Yahoo to walt0023
prob a v6
__________________

  #27  
Old 05-23-2003, 02:07 PM
Problem_Si Problem_Si is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Problem_Si
Quote:
not dissing on our civics or anything but i think mustangs have a much better setup handling wise.

AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!:thumbup:


Please tell me you're kidding??? I dunno on what planet this is true.

There are few things Mustangs are good at...1) Very shitty fuel economy and 2) Going fast in a straight line.

Turning is definitely not a Mustang strong point, hence the shitty suspension design, and way too heavy.

Argue all you want, but how many of you have seen Mustang on a AutoX course?
__________________
There's nary an animal alive that can outrun a greased Scotsman!
  #28  
Old 05-23-2003, 02:12 PM
doug294 doug294 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doug294
Thats another reason I think I beat him, the road was curvy and I think he sucked at driving, plu sit was even heaver due to the hydralic lift for the conv. top.
  #29  
Old 05-23-2003, 02:15 PM
Problem_Si Problem_Si is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Problem_Si
I dunno who is the BS artist here, and really dont care.

I've beaten many cars I shouldnt have, Mustangs included. That doesnt mean it didnt happen. I think the driver makes all the difference in the world. A win is a win, doesnt matter if its against a shithead, or pro racer.

Also, wouldnt it make a difference if the Stang was Auto? Just asking...

And I have raced many many v6's.....They're slow as dogshit. I wouldnt doubt a mildly modded Si could take one out. I used to love racing the v-6 mustangs, because I'd walk on them all day with the Zc. Top end too...Kinda funny leaving a Mustang at 135mph.

Word to the wise, keep your Kill stories to yourself. How would you ever hope to prove something of this nature? That is of course, unless you have video.
__________________
There's nary an animal alive that can outrun a greased Scotsman!
  #30  
Old 05-23-2003, 02:59 PM
mellowboy's Avatar
mellowboy mellowboy is offline
Amy dragged me here...
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,537
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mellowboy
Quote:
Originally posted by civic 16valver
why is it everybody hates on Stangs???


wot is wrong with them ???
Well i dont hate them. I jsut hate some of the owners.
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts