|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Quality Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: N vernon, Indiana
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Ok I just had my new cat back exhaust system put on my SL in place of stock back in february. My problem is after i put the exhaust on i noticed a horrible low end loss of torque. The loss is very evident on the car. It takes off horribly slow. Now I am trying to find out the problem of the system. The system includes 2.5 inch piping from the pre cat all the way back with a resonator in place of the cat to quiet things down. After the resonator it runs into a 2.5 single in dual out FLOWMASTER 50 series muffler. Out the outlets it runs into a dual setup. Now is my back pressure problem probably:
1. 2.5 is too big, should get new piping (2 1/4) 2. the new resonator i had put on to quiet it down, very baffled. 3.the FLOWMASTER 50 series muffler itself. 4.runnign dual exhaust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Sounds to me like you are just experiencing what happens when you upgrade your exhaust. Your powerband shifts to a higher RPM giving you more HP up top.
__________________
A few "bolt on" mods, a couple "cut, smash, hammer, weld, etc" mods, and a couple "why the hell do I need this/what the hell is this" weight reductions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Your worst nightmare
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Smithfield, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 45
Thanked 257 Times in 251 Posts
|
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
2.5 inch is not too big. In fact for a NA its about optimal. Is your car ATX?? If so then thats the culprit.
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
^ I've heard that some people notice a loss in difference, and that others don't when they switch to larger exhaust systems, I know Musashi had the same problem
__________________
Georgey on the subject of midget beastiality pornos Quote:
R.I.P Andy, you will be missed by all. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 1,780
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yeah i'm with talskinyguy, increasing the size of your exhaust decreases low end torque and puts it up top, so you probably have a higher top speed, but your acceleration is worse.
__________________
1997 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 - 269AWHP/290AWTQ (Mustang Dyno) - [email protected] - 1.756 60ft. - [email protected] (Best TDO4-9B Time) - Driver Mod - IPS TD04-19TL - SPEC 4+ - Wiseco Pistons - 3SX Custom Forged Rods - PMP FMIC + Much More.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: N vernon, Indiana
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
well guys is really doesnt matter anymore, out of fucking nowhere my automatic tranny went out on me...... i have to get a new tranny now, im thinking of manual conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Your worst nightmare
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Smithfield, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 45
Thanked 257 Times in 251 Posts
|
Re: Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Quote:
__________________
A few "bolt on" mods, a couple "cut, smash, hammer, weld, etc" mods, and a couple "why the hell do I need this/what the hell is this" weight reductions. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 2,804
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Is there anything that we could do to fix this problem? Top end power is great but if it reduces your torque at lower RPMs then that sucks....especially for us NAs. Would it be a bad idea to just stay stock? I know stock is restrictive but just how restrictive are we talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: N vernon, Indiana
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
my vote: stay stock, add testpipe only, or go aftermarket SINGLE exhaust, dont loose torque low just so you can accelerate faster at 100 mph, just not worth the loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Your worst nightmare
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Smithfield, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 45
Thanked 257 Times in 251 Posts
|
Re: Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
A custom 2.5 inch exhaust will not make you lose power. I know someone who has a ATX 92 base 3k with a custom 2.5 Magnaflow exhaust. He said power was gained in all ranges and he lost no low end. You just wont lose low end because most of the stock NA exhaust is near 2.5" anyway.
And its kinda funny, soon after you get a custom exhaust your tranny goes out. Well a week after I added my TT catback my clutch went out. Maybe it was all that extra power.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 2,804
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
What's the difference between a "custom" 2.5 setup versus a 2.5 piping from say Borla? I thought 2.5 is 2.5 and will all be the same... What's the stock setup? 2"?
00blackzx3, testpipes....are those CARB certified? Because I live in CA and have to worry about emissions. DOH!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Janesville, Wisconsin
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Testpipes are anti-emissions. I don't think you would pass emissions in CA with a testpipe... you would with a cat though. Just a tad more performance to your ride, but just a tad more destructive to the environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Quote:
Does no one listen to what I say? Higher RPM not higher speed.
__________________
A few "bolt on" mods, a couple "cut, smash, hammer, weld, etc" mods, and a couple "why the hell do I need this/what the hell is this" weight reductions. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 2,804
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Major Back Pressure Problem off New Exhaust System
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|