Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Honda > JDM Motor & Parts info/chat
JDM Motor & Parts info/chat Discussions on Mugen, Spoon etc. Plus, info on motor swaps (b18 's, b16's h22's etc) and other JDM info!
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-03-2005, 09:11 PM   #1
stopufool
AF Regular
 
stopufool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: carteret, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams, think that says it all, what do you guys think is better, looking to get this in my daily driver car.

I know the CTR cams are good, and reliable because they are OEM, but what about the skunk2 stage 1 cams(or any other similiar non oem stage 1 cam)?
stopufool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 01:15 AM   #2
SiGNAL748
AF Enthusiast
 
SiGNAL748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salinas, California
Posts: 3,676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SiGNAL748 Send a message via MSN to SiGNAL748
Ctr.
__________________
SiGNAL748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 02:32 AM   #3
kris
Off playing with fire.
 
kris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 10,371
Thanks: 22
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
By Jonathan Wong

People who own Hondas—especially Hondas powered with a twin-cam VTEC motor—are constantly seeking the best bang for the buck no matter what it takes. We often come across the topic concerning performance camshafts.

Who makes the best camshaft for my DOHC VTEC?

Is Brand X better than Brand Y?

Nah, man, my homie says that these cams are the bomb—adds X-amount of horsepower, dawg!

Honestly, it’s really hard to say. Each company R&Ds its product with the intention of giving you the best product on the market. Sometimes they work and sometimes they don’t work as well as we would like them to. You really have to research to find out what your wallet can afford as well as what kind of performance you’re hoping to achieve.

Basically, what we wanted to find out is if the high-dollar cams are worth the money. If you’re strapped for cash, maybe factory cams are a better bet for you. Your gains may be minimal, but then again, you haven’t spared all your paychecks that should have gone toward tuition. Money ain’t no thang for you? Go balls out and try a high-dollar, high-performance camshaft. Spending the extra dough will most likely propel you faster down the 1,320. We also gave our test companies the chance to come install and tune their own cams. You won’t see any biased results because they tuned their own product! If you have a question or problem that was overlooked in our test, the companies are the ones to contact.

In the first installment of our camshaft comparison, we were able to get our hands on a set of factory Integra Type R and the newly released Skunk2 cams. Both are great starting blocks and require either little or no modifications to the valvetrain for great performance. Stay tuned for more cam comparos in future issues.

Remember that every car is different so your results will differ. It does not mean that the product is faulty.

Factory Integra Type R

Everyone we know has either tried or wants to try out a set of Integra Type R cams. And why shouldn’t they? It’s a great beginner cam, and you really don’t need to strengthen the valvetrain. It is by far the biggest out of the B series family (U.S. market, of course) and can be identified on the intake cam by the engraved rings on the outer edge of the distributor key.

Since our test vehicle will be testing out other camshafts, we felt it would be wise to also install stiffer valvesprings and lost motion assemblies from a Type R. All of the Type R parts can be ordered through your local dealer.

Parts Needed:

Intake camshaft 14111-P73-J00
Exhaust camshaft 14121-P730J00

Intake valve spring (inner) 14751-P73-J01
Intake valve spring (outer) 14761-P73-J01 (both require eight pieces)
Lost motion assemblies 14820-P73-J00
(requires eight pieces)

In addition to testing out these cams, we thought it would be a good idea to show you how to install a set of camshafts and cam gears. The entire process is the same for removal and installation, but the valve lash will differ from company to company. Cam gear settings will also differ. Since the Type R cams are OEM, it would be the easiest to follow this example. Of course, we always recommend that you have a certified Honda technician perform the work if you cannot do so. If you’re more of a do-it-yourselfer, make sure that you have a Helms manual handy.

Our baseline run was conducted at AEBS in San Diego, California. The B18C1 put out 153.4 hp with 117.7 lb-ft, with the only modifications being an AEM cold-air intake system and a Trust after-cat exhaust. The car maintained stock timing, and the IAB solenoid was disconnected during this run (renders secondary butterflies in the intake manifold useless, causing bottom-end power to suffer). Once the Type R cams were installed, we were shocked to see that there was a drop in power to 152.1 hp with 116.9 lb-ft. Even with a set of HKS cam gears, we were unable to extract any further power from the cams while playing with the cam timing. Usually, adding the ITR cams will give you roughly 6 to 7 hp, like the test we performed in the Oct. ’98 article, “See the Cam, Speak the Cam.” So don’t let these graphs steer you in the wrong direction because it has been typically known that Type R cams will give most users at least some power. Honda is also quick to add that these are still factory replacement parts and were not made with the intention of producing X-amount of horsepower. It may have been that our test car is exceptionally strong, and we wondered along with AEBS if the original cams were already ITR cams. But they were not, and the thought that the IAB solenoid being disconnected came into play. It was determined after testing that our testing that our test car’s piston rings were bad, resulting in low compression. The ITR cams increase duration, and you need more compression to pull any real power. Obviously, since the compression is low, our full power outcome was not realized. An increase in duration also requires more exhaust flow, and our stock header was very restrictive. The performance gains would have been better if the engine was in better shape and if it had an aftermarket header. This is a good example of why you should regularly maintain your car.

Skunk2
On our second day at the dyno, we connected the IAB solenoid and added a GS-R fuel pump into the mix. This time, with the dyno strapped on at Harv’s Performance Center in Whittier, California, our second baseline with the ITR cams showed basically the same power figures as the previous day with a 152.7 hp at 117.2 lb-ft, a slight increase. It was then time to step up to the next level.

Skunk2 made the overnight journey to help participate in our cam comparison and master technician Steve Rothenbuehler was put to work right away. Known for being the mastermind of building Skunk2’s famous 10-second Integra, the task of switching the ITRs for the Skunk-deuces was no problem. The only thing added was its company cam gears with the additional torque bolts, an added insurance to prevent gear slippage. Skunk2 also adds that these cams can be installed without having to add any valvetrain components, and that’s good news for you because you can save your money for additional performance parts. Back on the dyno and without any tuning, the Skunk2 cams made 157.0 hp at 112.9 lb-ft, an easy 5 hp over the Type R cams. Dave Hsu, managing director of Skunk2, was pleased with the results, but both Steve and Dave agreed that more power could be realized with a little bit of tuning. So right now, you know that for a small increase in price over the Type R cams, the Skunk2s will make more power.

After tuning the cam gears and adding both a Field’s SFC VTEC controller and an adjustable fuel-pressure regulator, Skunk2 was able to extract 1 more horsepower, bringing the total output to 158.7 hp with 117.5 lb-ft. Because of the way that the GS-R intake manifold is designed, Skunk2 says that these cams and others out in the market will realize more power through a B16A or B18C5 (Integra Type R) motor. The manifolds found on those two motors are designed to flow much better than the GS-R.
kris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 02:20 PM   #4
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

ctr i'd never put a skunk2 part in my motor.
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 09:47 AM   #5
stopufool
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
stopufool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: carteret, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

you said that the car you were using had a b18c1 motor? how is it only making 158 HP???????

Yeah woudln't an oem honda camshaft be much more reliable?
stopufool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 11:24 AM   #6
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by stopufool
you said that the car you were using had a b18c1 motor? how is it only making 158 HP???????

Yeah woudln't an oem honda camshaft be much more reliable?
thats to the Wheels differnt from crank.

and yea honda would be better then skunk2 for pretty much every reason
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 07:30 PM   #7
stopufool
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
stopufool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: carteret, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

hey can i use my stock b16 oem cam gears with the ctr cams?
stopufool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 04:44 AM   #8
jcrx
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,040
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jcrx
Re: Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by stopufool
hey can i use my stock b16 oem cam gears with the ctr cams?
Yes, they are the same.
__________________
jcrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 05:24 PM   #9
SiGNAL748
AF Enthusiast
 
SiGNAL748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salinas, California
Posts: 3,676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SiGNAL748 Send a message via MSN to SiGNAL748
Holy crap jcrx, long time no see. How you been?
__________________
SiGNAL748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 05:33 PM   #10
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiGNAL748
Holy crap jcrx, long time no see. How you been?
oh my you are right!
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 07:19 PM   #11
kris
Off playing with fire.
 
kris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 10,371
Thanks: 22
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Re: Re: Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace$nyper
thats to the Wheels differnt from crank.

and yea honda would be better then skunk2 for pretty much every reason
Please explain this one, I am interested to know the reasoning behind it.
kris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 08:00 PM   #12
Last Time
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by kris
Please explain this one, I am interested to know the reasoning behind it.
Kris, I'm interested to know the same thing, and oh yeah and about why I haven't heard from you.
Last Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 08:30 PM   #13
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: Re: Re: Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by kris
Please explain this one, I am interested to know the reasoning behind it.
first Skunk2 sucks as far as motor parts. There was yet another *2 in my area that I know of* blow out due to skunk2s parts a shitty vavle infact. So after seeing this I won't put a Skunk2 part ever in my motor.

I'm super happy with my 00 ITR cams. I got them a heck of alot cheaper then i could get any other mild cam skunk crower etc.

I've seen pretty darn nice turbo set ups off ITR cams none off any other all motor cams.

I trust Hondas OEM.
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2005, 09:05 AM   #14
91civicDXdude
AF Fanatic
 
91civicDXdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saint Joseph, MO
Posts: 3,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 91civicDXdude
Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

stage 1 cams are wack. the type R cams are like stage 1s.
__________________
What makes you think you should be spoonfed?

http://4thgencivic0.tripod.com
91civicDXdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 04:32 AM   #15
jcrx
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,040
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jcrx
Re: CTR Cams vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiGNAL748
Holy crap jcrx, long time no see. How you been?
Got back from Iraq a couple months ago, been busy getting back in touch with the world
__________________
jcrx is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Honda > JDM Motor & Parts info/chat

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts