 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
08-27-2001, 04:36 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2002 Jettas
THE NEW SHIZnit for 2002
the new jetta vr6's are gonna be SO DAMN PHAT...  6 speed Transmission 201 HP DUAL chrome Exhaust and 24 valve engine instead of the 12... HELL YEAH.. it's gonna be some good shit say BYE BYE to the civic SI or integra cuz this is gonna be hella lot faster... NEWBIE TALKING HERE OFF OF lil EXperience so please correct me if i'm wrong AND.... the 1.8t's are gonna be faster too... but..... my vr6 T will be much faster.. haha |
|
|
|
|
09-22-2001, 12:48 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2002 Jettas
o fo sho! i would bump that shit! that is gunne be heLLa tyte!
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-11-2001, 02:36 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The engine is tight but I'd rather have a Gti. The jetta bodies are fruty looking. I like the A3 body style better than the new stuff. Drop the new engine in one of those and watch it fly if you can. HA!!!!
__________________
Take it from me....GO GERMAN!!!! BMW, VW, Benz, Porshe and Audi!! But not Honda please!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2002, 01:23 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i have one :sun:
__________________
   
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-17-2002, 11:16 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
Maximum Car Guy
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ramsey, Minnesota
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
 |
||
|
|
|
|
10-02-2002, 03:01 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
 The '02 1.8T will be a lot faster than the Jetta VR6. The VR6 is fast but the 1.8T is running 180hp and that turbo really makes a diff. I have a 1.8T and have raced the VR6 and sorry to say the VR6 lost. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-02-2002, 11:24 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
Maximum Car Guy
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ramsey, Minnesota
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Kinda doubt it.... My 24V VR6 puts out 201 hp and has alot more torque available than the turbo. I drove both when I bought my GLI and the VR6 had WAY more pull. The torque was always on, no waiting to spool-up. The 1.8T was fun to drive and it would be very easy to boost the output with the turbo but I didn't want to void any warranties. |
||
|
|
|
|
10-03-2002, 03:56 PM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have not driven the GLI but I have seen them around as well as other VR6's and they don't seem as fast. I can only compare the 1.8T the BMW. I raced my Dad in my 1.8T against his '00 BMW 328i and we were both even.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2002, 06:44 PM
|
#9 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
1.8 vrs VR6
The new 1.8 obviously has more kick than the previous 150 HP, but the start up lag is still there and the torque with the VR6 is really strong even on the 174 HP model. The VR6 is faster off the line - but don't believe there would be a lot of difference to 100. You can modify each with the turbo getting the most in the end, but the higher the boost the less the engine life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
