 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Which would be better street racer | |||
| Nova |
   
|
3 | 60.00% |
| chevelle |
  
|
2 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
10-11-2002, 05:45 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: N/A, Connecticut
Posts: 2,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Nova vs chevelle
cant decide, which one is better i know you have a nova redneck what do you think
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2002, 06:50 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Camarillo, Longbeach, Ventura, California
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
hahahaha, I beat him to it!
Nova is lighter, much lighter, ricer level of weight. Both can have massive engines, or extremly built 350's *383's in rednecks case* I personally like Chevelles better, but I love big ass cars but yah....GO NOVA!
__________________
 My new RHD project! Solid Crew (Circa 2002) |
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2002, 08:39 PM
|
#3 | |
|
On Fire!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Nova Vs Chevelle ....
hmmmmmmmmm Well, like TV said... the Nova is lighter than the Chevelle. 2nd Generation Nova's 68-72 weighed in at about 3100lbs. Chevelles came in at about 3400-3500 lbs. They came with a wide range of motors... 250ci Straight 6s, to 327's, 350s, Big block motors like the 396, 427, and 454. In 1969, a Dealer named Don Yenko produced some of best known classics ever. He did things from Camaro's, Chevelle's and even rarer were the Yenko Novas. Yenko equipped the Nova with two engine options a insurance decoy, the Yenko Deuce with a radical 350. And a car known as the Ultimate sleeper the 427 Nova. Yenko produced the 427 Nova in 1969 only. There were around thirty built with only seven or eight that are accounted for today. This is the very first one produced. This 1969 Yenko Nova was a car described by Don Yenko in one of his last interviews as “a beast, almost lethal, a car that they should not have produced; as they were skirting the edge of product liability when they built this car”. The Nova was not a COPO high performance 427 motor from the factory. It was built with a transplanted 427 motor as Yenko did with the 1967 and 1968 Camaros. Although GM put factory 427s in Camaro’s and Chevelles, it is known that the GM factory apparently would not put a COPO 427 motor in a Nova. Why not? The most obvious reason would be just as Don Yenko describes himself; using the word “lethal”, and a matter of liability. The body weight of the Nova was less than that of a Corvette. Stuffing a high performance L72 427 Corvette motor in a car of less body weight certainly had to result in tire-smoking performance. The Yenko Nova's were known to turn elapsed times of 10.90’s in the quarter mile. Of course it was with racing slicks, but few other modifications were necessary. Chevelles on the other hand, have that Muscle car look to them. I like them, but i'm partial to the Nova... Other tid bits about the Nova, the 396 Nova SS's came with a 55/45 weight distribution, and the 350 Nova SS's came with a 50/50 weight distribution. Giving them superb handling for such a of its age and size. Even though the Nova is actually a fairly small car. ummmmmmm anymore questions???
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2002, 12:31 AM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Courtenay
Posts: 3,892
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I thought they did make COPO 427 Novas... guess you learn something everyday... except for those days where you don't learn anything...
 I like the look of the Chevelle more, with the Corvette tail lights, and the 4 light front end... I love the look. Of course, the Nova would be my pic for the track, with the lighter weight, and superior handling. I've always been partial to the Nova, even the earlier Chevy II.
__________________
 Connor - Porsche Nazi since 2001, VW defiler since 2004  This here's a Fabrication forum!  My lugnut requires more torque than your LS1 makes. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2002, 04:39 AM
|
#5 | |
|
On Fire!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
A few pictures of those Chevelles... yummy.. Hope this works...
A 68 Chevelle SS  A 69 Chevelle SS  A 70 Chevelle SS  All are bad ass cars, i'd love to have one myself!
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2002, 04:46 AM
|
#6 | |
|
On Fire!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
A few Nova's.... gotta be fair haha.
A 67 Nova II SS  A 68 Nova SS  A 69 Nova SS  A 70 Nova SS  And Just because I have a 72 (nonSS  ) I Figured ill show one...
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
