-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical
Register FAQ Community
Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-17-2002, 02:13 PM
shocky shocky is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to shocky Send a message via MSN to shocky
Question about Intake Manifold

I have a Second Gen B16A Engine, with Intake, headers and Exhaust, if I put a TYPE R Intake Manifold, how much HorsePower I will gain???

I have a friend that is my rival, he has a LS/VTEC, and in 1/4 of mile it wins me for an advantage by a car .

Will I win my friend with this new modification?

Thanks for Your help!!
__________________
94 Acura Integra 4 Door, JDM Si-R II B16A 5.4Million Series Engine Swap (170HP Stock), With CTR Camshafts, STR Camgears, Clutch Masters Stage 4, DC Sport Ceramic Header 4-2-1, Exhaust System 2.25" W/Apex-i N1 Cat-Back, AEM Cold Air Intake, ECU Erick Racing 5,800rpm Vtec, B&M Fuel Pressure Regulator, Y21 Code GearBox, 16" Rims W/Yokohama Avs Sports. It's not much but I still can smoke fools. Oh Yeah and Don't forget, I'm Proud Member of Guatemala Streetracing. http://www.gtstreetracing.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2002, 08:13 PM
sparq's Avatar
sparq sparq is offline
AF Premium User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,829
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to sparq
Doubbtfull...
__________________
AF's Official Asshole




RIP AUNIE
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:41 AM
civickiller civickiller is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to civickiller
the type r manifold wont add that much hp, maybe like 4hp. so youll run a tenth of a second quicker, thats it. you wont beat your friend unless he only runs a tenth of a second faster than you
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:51 AM
SmoovSol SmoovSol is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SmoovSol
get the intake manifold that u have right now ported and polished and you will notice a better gain then that Type-R manifold, not sure about number gain cause it depends on what else u have....
__________________
Dont be Afraid Ta Be Different...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2002, 04:30 PM
Fireinthesky28's Avatar
Fireinthesky28 Fireinthesky28 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 227
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Fireinthesky28
Quote:
Originally posted by civickiller
the type r manifold wont add that much hp, maybe like 4hp. so youll run a tenth of a second quicker, thats it. you wont beat your friend unless he only runs a tenth of a second faster than you
Nice deduction

You could get a c.a.intake to go with your manifold and that might juice things up a bit...but the winning might be a stretch still
__________________
So the biblical scholars mis-translated the Hebrew word for "young woman" into the Greek word for "virgin," which was a pretty easy mistake to make, since there is only a subtle difference in the spelling. But back then it was the "virgin" that caught people's attention. It's not every day a virgin conceives and bears a son. So you keep that for a couple of hundred years, and the nexy thing you know, you have the Roman Catholic church.
-Snatch
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-29-2004, 03:41 PM
op012503's Avatar
op012503 op012503 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 264
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to op012503
Re: Question about Intake Manifold

i would argue that the b16a stock head flows slightly better than the type r. If your rival beats u by a very small margin, think about getting some underdrive pullies from unorthodox racing--your cheapest and best bet. You might want to get some more aggresive cams and some new cam sprockets (aem). I think all that is worth about 20 hp at the high end of the curve.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-29-2004, 03:42 PM
op012503's Avatar
op012503 op012503 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 264
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to op012503
Re: Question about Intake Manifold

i mean to say intake not head. peace
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-29-2004, 04:35 PM
boosted331 boosted331 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Question about Intake Manifold

Quote:
Originally Posted by op012503
i would argue that the b16a stock head flows slightly better than the type r.
The B16 and ITR castings are identical from the factory, but the ITR will flow marginally better as they have a mild hand port job from the factory.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-29-2004, 06:30 PM
op012503's Avatar
op012503 op012503 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 264
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to op012503
Re: Re: Re: Question about Intake Manifold

Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted331
The B16 and ITR castings are identical from the factory, but the ITR will flow marginally better as they have a mild hand port job from the factory.
yeah your right about the port job. But the actual gains are next to nothing and dont justify the price. All im saying is that the b16 manifold flows like mad. i remember reading that it is good for about 500hp
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-11-2004, 03:19 PM
shocky shocky is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to shocky Send a message via MSN to shocky
Re: Question about Intake Manifold

dont do that, i bought the Type R intake manifold and i didn't felt any difference! (N)
__________________
94 Acura Integra 4 Door, JDM Si-R II B16A 5.4Million Series Engine Swap (170HP Stock), With CTR Camshafts, STR Camgears, Clutch Masters Stage 4, DC Sport Ceramic Header 4-2-1, Exhaust System 2.25" W/Apex-i N1 Cat-Back, AEM Cold Air Intake, ECU Erick Racing 5,800rpm Vtec, B&M Fuel Pressure Regulator, Y21 Code GearBox, 16" Rims W/Yokohama Avs Sports. It's not much but I still can smoke fools. Oh Yeah and Don't forget, I'm Proud Member of Guatemala Streetracing. http://www.gtstreetracing.com

Last edited by shocky; 05-18-2004 at 01:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-11-2004, 04:00 PM
Tranzlogic Tranzlogic is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 669
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tranzlogic
Re: Question about Intake Manifold

your not really gonna feel a diff from any of it, one thing depends on another and iff all parts are not performing in unison than the gains are never optimal...if you run an edlebrock victor X or an ITR intake ( which i think you should ) with a CAI ( aem ) 70mm throttlebody and a p&p with an ITR header you will then notice a much better gain...having one thing that flows more does hardly any good if all the componants before and after it are still flowing the same ammount.. you want the most pull for the dime to beat this kid... ? throw in a set of ITR or even skunk 2 mild cams with some underdrive pully's ( as stated ) with perhaps some aem tru-time cam gears and rather a JUN or Skunk2 programmed ecu and you will pull on him....to do all that is needed to fully apply more air for combustion will be much more costly in the long run after the head work and the fuel system adjustments..im not saying you shouldnt do that..i fully reccomend it, its just i dont think you sound reasy to get into all that, i think you just want more quick power for the buck so you can pull on this kid and perhaps a few others...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-11-2004, 04:01 PM
Tranzlogic Tranzlogic is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 669
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tranzlogic
Re: Question about Intake Manifold

but hey thats just my 2 cents
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2004, 11:20 AM
shocky shocky is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to shocky Send a message via MSN to shocky
Re: Re: Question about Intake Manifold

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tranzlogic
but hey thats just my 2 cents
hey man, thanks for your help.

But first i bought my CTR Cams and STR Camgears, i already have CAI(AEM) and my DC Sport 4-2-1 Ceramic Header with a Erick Racing Ecu.

And finally i put the ITR Intake Manifold and i didn't Felt any diference, i going to buy the Skunk 2 Manifold, do you think that the skunk 2 it's better than the ITR Manifold?????

Thanks !
__________________
94 Acura Integra 4 Door, JDM Si-R II B16A 5.4Million Series Engine Swap (170HP Stock), With CTR Camshafts, STR Camgears, Clutch Masters Stage 4, DC Sport Ceramic Header 4-2-1, Exhaust System 2.25" W/Apex-i N1 Cat-Back, AEM Cold Air Intake, ECU Erick Racing 5,800rpm Vtec, B&M Fuel Pressure Regulator, Y21 Code GearBox, 16" Rims W/Yokohama Avs Sports. It's not much but I still can smoke fools. Oh Yeah and Don't forget, I'm Proud Member of Guatemala Streetracing. http://www.gtstreetracing.com

Last edited by shocky; 05-18-2004 at 01:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-12-2004, 04:57 PM
Tranzlogic Tranzlogic is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 669
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tranzlogic
Re: Question about Intake Manifold

well the skunk 2 is modeled after the ITR so the diff will be very minimal..if your going to pay skunk 2 price i would find a edlebrock victor X, even tho i hate them ebay has them sometimes for pretty good prices. see an ITR-skunk2 and victorX are all pretty much in the same class...until you get into the venom,AC,quade all that high end stuff...but if i had to pick and the ITR didnt do much for ya, then pick up a Victor X and hope for the best..you will have no problom selling that ITR if you choose to
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-13-2004, 12:27 PM
shocky shocky is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to shocky Send a message via MSN to shocky
Re: Re: Question about Intake Manifold

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tranzlogic
well the skunk 2 is modeled after the ITR so the diff will be very minimal..if your going to pay skunk 2 price i would find a edlebrock victor X, even tho i hate them ebay has them sometimes for pretty good prices. see an ITR-skunk2 and victorX are all pretty much in the same class...until you get into the venom,AC,quade all that high end stuff...but if i had to pick and the ITR didnt do much for ya, then pick up a Victor X and hope for the best..you will have no problom selling that ITR if you choose to

hey man, thanks a lot!!!!!!!

I got a problem, here in my country i can't find any victor X, so i have to choose between the ITR and the Skunk 2. i'll go for the skunk 2, i hope that i'll gain 3hp more o less!
__________________
94 Acura Integra 4 Door, JDM Si-R II B16A 5.4Million Series Engine Swap (170HP Stock), With CTR Camshafts, STR Camgears, Clutch Masters Stage 4, DC Sport Ceramic Header 4-2-1, Exhaust System 2.25" W/Apex-i N1 Cat-Back, AEM Cold Air Intake, ECU Erick Racing 5,800rpm Vtec, B&M Fuel Pressure Regulator, Y21 Code GearBox, 16" Rims W/Yokohama Avs Sports. It's not much but I still can smoke fools. Oh Yeah and Don't forget, I'm Proud Member of Guatemala Streetracing. http://www.gtstreetracing.com
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts