-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-09-2005, 08:59 PM
DinanM3_S2's Avatar
DinanM3_S2 DinanM3_S2 is offline
Scuderia Kimi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Too good to be true?

IAs far as I can tell, virtually nobody has experamented very much with turbo BMW 3.2l S54 engines (E46 M3 and 2002 M Coupe/Roadster). The 11.5:1 CR has been generally percieved as way too high for a turbocharger; until recently. A company named DA-Motorsports is about to release a turbo setup for the S54, at stock compression and 8-10psi. They estimate 550hp.

I am not too up to date on turbo technology, but I always thought that an 11.5:1 CR was way too high for most FI. Here is a link...
http://www.da-motorsport.com/projele...kits/index.htm

My first question is if these numbers are even feasable from the S54.

My second question is if this setup would reduce the reliability of the engine to the point of it breaking down too often for daily use.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC
Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC

"I collect walnuts"
-Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2005, 09:31 PM
beef_bourito's Avatar
beef_bourito beef_bourito is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,191
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Too good to be true?

it's all about engineering the kit to work well. these people put alot of work into designing these kits so that they do work.

If you have the proper cooling you might be able to run that kind of boost, it seems kinda high to me but they might have done something good.

As for the numbers, it could be that high, with that compression ration on that boost it wouldn't surprise me.

Again, these people engineer their kits to work well with the car they're designed for. i doubt it would reduce the reliability of the car much, it's all about how you drive. if you redline it on a regular basis, the engine won't last as long, if you drive normally, it could last very long.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2005, 11:27 PM
Schister66's Avatar
Schister66 Schister66 is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
Re: Too good to be true?

all you have to have is good tuning....you can boost anything, but the tuner has to be dead on. I would assume that they're using a big turbo that flows a lot of air, but doesn't run high PSI. They used a fairly large intercooler as well, that'll help decrease the risk of detonation too. It'll be interesting to see what happens w/ it.....
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2005, 07:40 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: Too good to be true?

Gonna take a lot of timing retard or higher octane fuel. Dynamic compression ratio will be high, but fuck, some people run 16-17psi on our stock 9.5:1 compression ratio KAs.... So 8-10psi is reasonable with good charge cooling. Maybe even more if you use water injection...

And it doesn't require "better" tuning... Saying that is basically saying that with lower compression ratio, you don't need to put effort into tuning car. Which is BS.

Biggest thing on this setup as opposed to other setups is how much timing retard is needed....

Reliability won't go down....but the engine will require more frequent/in depth matinence...just like any turbo car...
__________________
-Cory

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar
Stock internals. Daily driven.
12.6@122mph
496whp/436wtq at 25psi
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2005, 10:23 PM
Schister66's Avatar
Schister66 Schister66 is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
Re: Re: Too good to be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nissanfanatic
Gonna take a lot of timing retard or higher octane fuel. Dynamic compression ratio will be high, but fuck, some people run 16-17psi on our stock 9.5:1 compression ratio KAs.... So 8-10psi is reasonable with good charge cooling. Maybe even more if you use water injection...

And it doesn't require "better" tuning... Saying that is basically saying that with lower compression ratio, you don't need to put effort into tuning car. Which is BS.

Biggest thing on this setup as opposed to other setups is how much timing retard is needed....

Reliability won't go down....but the engine will require more frequent/in depth matinence...just like any turbo car...
Not necessarily a "better" tune per say, but a more conservative tune at very least....
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2005, 09:25 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: Too good to be true?

Not really... Every tune has a point of knock for timing and a point of ping for Air/Fuel ratio on a given fuel and ambient air temp. If 8.5:1 CR on 15psi allows only 18* total timing on 93 octane pump, then 20* is going to knock. If 10.5:1 CR on 10psi only allows 18* total timing on 93, the 20* is still going to knock. Same with Air/Fuel ratio.

The only thing CR changes is how much boost you can run on a given octane fuel... If you can get 116 octane fuel cheap and abundant(yea right), then fuck it, go for 10.5:1 and enjoy the off boost driving.. But if you are limited to 93 octane, you should prolly aim lower for streetable power(8.5:1-9.5:1). Personally, whenever I finally do build an engine, I'm prolly going as low as I can find just so I can run 400whp on the street without having to run racing gas all the time...Since thats my goal...
__________________
-Cory

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar
Stock internals. Daily driven.
12.6@122mph
496whp/436wtq at 25psi
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2005, 10:23 PM
Schister66's Avatar
Schister66 Schister66 is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
Re: Too good to be true?

gotcha...
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2005, 12:54 PM
fairladyz_gt-r's Avatar
fairladyz_gt-r fairladyz_gt-r is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 403
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fairladyz_gt-r Send a message via Yahoo to fairladyz_gt-r
Re: Too good to be true?

I though the S54 engine is already at its edge...i heard people who remove their speed limiter often blow their engine up if constently travaling above 250km/h
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2005, 05:58 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: Too good to be true?

Could be because when you operate in higher RPM ranges, it is highly recommended that you switch to one step colder spark plugs...
__________________
-Cory

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar
Stock internals. Daily driven.
12.6@122mph
496whp/436wtq at 25psi
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts