-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical
Register FAQ Community
Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-09-2005, 01:42 PM
rebelsrule180 rebelsrule180 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
small block v. big block

I bought a 72 charger about a month ago and the 318 (non original) that was in the car was locked up and i know where a 383 that is running is and am thinking about putting it in the car. I know i would have to change the motor mounts but would i have to get a new drivetrain since the 904 that is with the 318 will be replaced with a 727 when i get the 383?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:37 PM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: small block v. big block

Actually, I believe you change the "K" member to put the B and RB engines in there. A more knowledgeable MOPAR guy could answer that.
The 383 is certainly a good one, especially a '68-'70 "Magnum" (painted orange, not blue). Big bore, short stroke. Good medium-sized performance engine. With today's technology, though, a 360 might be the hot ticket. A well done 360 will make 500 horsepower and more low-end than a 340. For a drag motor, the 340 is the small block of choice.
There is also the school of thought "Never send a boy to do a man's job", calling for a 440 or bigger, to compete in today's street freak crowd.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-21-2005, 02:26 AM
BleedDodge's Avatar
BleedDodge BleedDodge is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,121
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BleedDodge
Re: small block v. big block

Yeah you'll need the other K-member. You'll need a different driveshaft since the tailshafts on the two transmissions are different lengths. So, get the 383 and a 727 to go with it, and the right driveshaft and you're set. Leave the differential alone, I would anyways.
__________________
My Mopars
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2005, 05:06 PM
rkcuda rkcuda is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The existing k frame will be fine. In 73-74 the k frame style was changed and there is a big vs Small block version. You simply need BB mootor mounts. The driveshaft as stated above needs changing and the radiator has the outlet on the other side.

The rear is likely a 8 3/4 which will be just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2005, 11:00 PM
BleedDodge's Avatar
BleedDodge BleedDodge is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,121
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BleedDodge
Re: small block v. big block

He might need a different K-member yet. It depends what kind of oilpan it has on it. If you take a 361 out of a Dodge grain truck or something you'll never make it fit in there without that other K-member. That's how it is.
__________________
My Mopars
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:08 PM
rkcuda rkcuda is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not for the engine choice listed. Besides it would be easier to change the oil pan than change a K frame.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-24-2005, 08:39 AM
rebelsrule180 rebelsrule180 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: small block v. big block

Rkcuda you win! I'll Clear this up cuz i know everyone is posting something about this topic. In 73 and 74 they changed the mounts and k frames. If you have a 71 or 72 charger anything will fit in their, you just gotta make sure you have the right motor mounts.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-24-2005, 08:42 AM
rebelsrule180 rebelsrule180 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: small block v. big block

Well I think i'm fixin to get a 360 so i know that will fit reguardless. The 360's outta a 74 charger and has been rebuilt. Pushin out about 450 h.p. is what the guy told me it dynoed at. Also the 727 i'm buying has been rebuilt.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2005, 01:48 PM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: small block v. big block

Get as much of the dyno and build information as you can. You need to know exactly what the fuel requirements are. At 450 horse, it could be a "low" OR "high" compression engine, depending on the direction the builder took.
Anything over 9.5:1 with iron heads is asking for trouble without mixing race fuel into 93. For 93 octane, 9.5:1 is considered the practical limit. There are those that follow the "bigger cam" philosophy to ward off detonation (it will "bleed" off cylinder pressure at lower engine speeds). It works to a point, but not at higher RPM.
Octane boosters are a waste of time and money. Make sure the octane meets the engine's requirements. You can use a 50/50 mix up to about 11:1 (110 racing gas, 93 octane "premium").
That car should run pretty strong with that engine in it. Have fun!

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-09-2005, 10:59 PM
moparrr07 moparrr07 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: small block v. big block

http://www.bigblockdart.com/weights/engineweight.shtml
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts