 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-30-2001, 10:41 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 736
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Jag XJ220 vs. McLaren F1
ok. 300,000 dollar difference here. Jag cheeper. Jag has fastest V6 ever. McLaren has fastest ever. both road legal. McLaren has faster top end by ~20 mph, and better 0-60accel by .3 sec. Both are so much more powerful than you will ever need, plus the Jag is tunable. It all comes down to how well you like the styling, interior comforts (or lack therof), and handling. Me, I prefer the Jag. Which do you all like better?
__________________
Check out my webpage at www.darkwing72211.com. It's got a new page specifically for my Car! |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2001, 03:17 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,010
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
easy...McLaren, without a doubt. the jag doesn't even look that great. the McLaren is sooo much better in sooo many ways. central seating, carbon fiber, the exclusiveness(is that a word??), and more...
__________________
 Please impede from anathematizing me just because I elocute loquacious locutions more Brobdingnaging than one could elucidate with a perspicacity as Lilliputian as your own. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2001, 05:03 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Old Mod
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
"Exclusivity" is the word you're looking for.
I take the McLaren, yet I also want to say that I think such a comparison is an insult to my intelligence. 
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" |
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2001, 08:03 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Regular
 Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 327
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
It's not Enzo, that Jag is bad.
 Wasn't it the one in Gone In Sixty Seconds? They only show it for a few seconds when Sway get's out of it. Before the dude get's shot I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2001, 09:20 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Old Mod
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Yes, I know. Exaggeration was used for emphasis. After all, the XJ220 was the worlds fastest supercar for short stint...until the F1. And yes, it was in Gone in Sixty Seconds. It is a great car, I think it looks good and it's obviously fast as sin, but the McLaren just blows it out of the water, IMO.
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" |
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2001, 11:38 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,010
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
thanks enzo.i knew it was that i just couldn't spell it so i just made up a word
__________________
Please impede from anathematizing me just because I elocute loquacious locutions more Brobdingnaging than one could elucidate with a perspicacity as Lilliputian as your own. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2001, 11:51 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Ferrari Guy
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: nowhere
Posts: 3,404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Easy choice, Mclaren here, it is more pleasing to the eye and i don't think i could go around saying a drove a supercar with a V6, but i still yelped like a puppy when i saw it in gone in 60 seconds.
__________________
The contents of this post may be fictitious. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2001, 03:18 PM
|
#8 | ||
|
Old Mod
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" |
||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
