|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Scheduled Maintanence-waterpump w/ timing belt
Is it common/preferred to change the water pump and thermostat with the timing belt on a Mazda 2001, 2.5L V6 ES (at 60000). I have heard the engine is the non-interference, but the water pump-being so close to replace it (just in case). One guy says its too early to consider (he'd wait till 120K)-the other says go ahead for an extra 300+...it'll save you double that in the long run?
Just looking for some other opinions. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Scheduled Maintanence-waterpump w/ timing belt
The Mazda dealer told me not to worry about it when they were already changing the timing belt for me. I was more than willing to pay the extra for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|